College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7587. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7587. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
In this commentary, we reflect on how the three processes of , , and knowledge translation (KT) practices, as introduced in a critical interpretive synthesis on sustaining KT, might be drawn on to improve KT sustainability in the northern Australian health system, and some likely challenges. The synthesis provides a useful reminder that health systems are systems and offers an analytical framework against which to map approaches that aim to align knowledge production and utilisation. By positioning "places" of knowledge utilisation and actor roles and networks as key to KT sustainability, the framework also offers the potential to draw attention to non-clinical settings, actors, and relationships that are central to improving health, but that may be historically neglected in KT research and scholarship.
在这篇评论中,我们反思了在一项关于维持知识转化(KT)的批判性解释性综合研究中介绍的、、和 这三个知识转化实践过程如何被借鉴,以提高澳大利亚北部卫生系统的 KT 可持续性,以及一些可能的挑战。该综合研究提供了一个有用的提醒,即卫生系统是 系统,并提供了一个分析框架,以映射旨在使知识生产和利用保持一致的方法。通过将知识利用的“场所”和角色以及网络定位为 KT 可持续性的关键,该框架还有可能引起人们对非临床环境、对改善健康至关重要但在 KT 研究和学术中历来被忽视的行为者和关系的关注。