Suppr超能文献

[T2 mapping在评估子宫内膜癌肌层浸润的病理类型、分级及深度中的价值]

[The value of T2 mapping for evaluating the pathological type, grade and depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma].

作者信息

Li S J, Zhang Z X, Liu J, Wang W J, Wang J, Zhang Y, Cheng J L

机构信息

Division of Magnetic Resonance, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.

Division of Radiology, Anyang People's Hospital, Anyang 455000, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 23;45(8):673-680. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220124-00055.

Abstract

To investigate the value of T2 map and synthetic T2WI generated by T2 mapping in evaluating the histological type, pathological classification and depth of myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma (EC). Seventy-three patients with pathologically proven EC diagnosed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from December 2019 to December 2021 and 42 healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. All subjects underwent conventional MRI, diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and T2 mapping sequence for the pelvic cavity to test the T2 values and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the focus nidus of the patients and the normal endometrium of the volunteers. The T2 and ADC values of EC vs normal endometrium, and those of different histological types and pathological grades were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of T2 and ADC values in determining the pathological type and classification of EC. In addition, two radiologists used synthetic T2WI combined with T2 map and conventional T2WI combined with DWI, respectively, to evaluate the depth of myometrial invasion, and compared the imaging results with the results of pathological diagnosis to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the two methods in determining the depth of myometrial invasion. The T2 and ADC values of endometrial carcinoma were 85.0 (80.8, 92.5) ms and 0.71 (0.64, 0.77) ×10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of normal endometrium [147.4 (123.4, 176.7) ms and 1.46 (1.26, 1.76)×10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively; both <0.05]. The T2 values of endometrioid carcinoma (EA) [84.1 (79.5, 88.7) ms] were significantly lower than those of non-EA [98.8 (92.1, 102.8) ms; <0.05]. There was no significant difference in ADC values between EA and non-EA (=0.075). The T2 values of G1, G2 and G3 groups in EA were 89.1 (84.4, 94.4) ms, 83.6 (80.9, 86.2) ms, and 76.5 (71.4, 80.3) ms, respectively. There were significant differences in the T2 values between G1 vs G2, G1 vs G3, and G2 vs G3 groups, respectively (all <0.017). Significant difference was also found in the ADC values between the G1 and G3 groups (<0.017). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of T2 values in distinguishing EA from non-EA was 0.867. The AUC of T2 values, ADC values and their combination in predicting high-grade EA was 0.888, 0.730 and 0.895, respectively. The accuracy of synthetic T2WI+ T2 map and conventional T2WI+ DWI in the diagnosis of deep myometrial invasion was 78.1% and 79.5%, respectively, with no significant difference (>0.05). T2 mapping has great potential in preoperative evaluation of EC. The quantitative T2 value can be used in the diagnosis, pathological classification and grading of EC. The combination of synthetic T2WI and T2 map may be helpful to determine the depth of myometrial invasion.

摘要

探讨T2图及T2mapping生成的合成T2WI在评估子宫内膜癌(EC)组织学类型、病理分级及肌层浸润深度中的价值。选取2019年12月至2021年12月在郑州大学第一附属医院经病理证实的73例EC患者及42例健康志愿者纳入研究。所有受试者均行盆腔常规MRI、扩散加权成像(DWI)及T2mapping序列检查,测量患者病灶及志愿者正常子宫内膜的T2值和表观扩散系数(ADC)。比较EC与正常子宫内膜、不同组织学类型及病理分级的T2值和ADC值。绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评估T2值和ADC值对EC病理类型及分级的诊断效能。另外,两名放射科医师分别采用合成T2WI联合T2图及传统T2WI联合DWI评估肌层浸润深度,并与病理诊断结果对比,评价两种方法对肌层浸润深度的诊断效能。子宫内膜癌的T2值和ADC值分别为85.0(80.8,92.5)ms和0.71(0.64,0.77)×10⁻³mm²/s,显著低于正常子宫内膜[分别为147.4(123.4,176.7)ms和1.46(1.26,1.76)×10⁻³mm²/s;均P<0.05]。子宫内膜样癌(EA)的T2值[84.1(79.5,88.7)ms]显著低于非EA[98.8(92.1,102.8)ms;P<0.05]。EA与非EA的ADC值差异无统计学意义(P=0.075)。EA中G1、G2和G3组的T2值分别为89.1(84.4,94.4)ms、83.6(80.9,86.2)ms和76.5(71.4,80.3)ms。G1与G2、G1与G3、G2与G3组的T2值差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.017)。G1与G3组的ADC值差异也有统计学意义(P<0.017)。T2值区分EA与非EA的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.867。T2值、ADC值及其联合预测高级别EA的AUC分别为0.888、0.730和0.895。合成T2WI+T2图及传统T2WI+DWI诊断肌层浸润深度的准确率分别为78.1%和79.5%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。T2mapping在EC术前评估中有很大潜力。定量T2值可用于EC的诊断、病理分级及分类。合成T2WI与T2图联合可能有助于确定肌层浸润深度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验