Suppr超能文献

WOUND-Q的进一步心理测量学验证及重测信度

Further psychometric validation and test-retest reproducibility of the WOUND-Q.

作者信息

Simonsen Nina Vestergaard, Klassen Anne F, Rae Charlene, Dalaei Farima, Cano Stefan, Poulsen Lotte, Pusic Andrea L, Sørensen Jens Ahm

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14354. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14354. Epub 2023 Aug 15.

Abstract

WOUND-Q is a condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure developed for all types of chronic wounds, located anywhere on the body. To establish reliability and validity of a patient-reported outcome measure, multiple pieces of evidence are required. The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement properties of 9 of the 13 WOUND-Q scales and perform a test-retest reproducibility study in an international sample. In August 2022, we invited members of an international online community (Prolific.com) with any type of chronic wound to complete a survey containing the WOUND-Q scales, the Wound-QoL and EQ-5D. A test-retest survey was performed 7 days after the first survey. It was possible to examine the reliability and validity of eight of the nine WOUND-Q scales by Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT). To examine test-retest reproducibility intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), the standard error of the measurement and the smallest detectable change were calculated. In total, 421 patients from 22 different countries with 11 different types of chronic wounds took part in this study. Our analyses provided further evidence of the reliability and validity of the scales measuring wound characteristics (assessment, drainage, smell), health-related quality of life (life impact, psychological, sleep, social) and wound treatment (dressing).

摘要

WOUND-Q是一种针对特定病情的患者报告结局指标,适用于身体任何部位的各类慢性伤口。要确立患者报告结局指标的可靠性和有效性,需要多方面的证据。本研究的目的是检验WOUND-Q的13个量表中9个量表的测量特性,并在一个国际样本中进行重测信度研究。2022年8月,我们邀请了国际在线社区(Prolific.com)中患有任何类型慢性伤口的成员完成一项包含WOUND-Q量表、伤口生活质量量表(Wound-QoL)和欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D)的调查。在首次调查7天后进行了重测调查。通过拉施测量理论(RMT)可以检验9个WOUND-Q量表中8个量表的可靠性和有效性。为检验重测信度,计算了组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差和最小可检测变化。共有来自22个不同国家、患有11种不同类型慢性伤口的421名患者参与了本研究。我们的分析进一步证明了测量伤口特征(评估、引流、气味)、健康相关生活质量(生活影响、心理、睡眠、社交)和伤口治疗(敷料)的量表的可靠性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de5f/10777769/650014e5044b/IWJ-21-e14354-g007.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验