• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非裔美国男性和女性身体活动和久坐行为的验证研究。

Validation Study of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in African-American Men and Women.

机构信息

Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 1010 New Jersey Ave SE, Washington, D.C, 20003, USA.

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Oct;11(5):2711-2719. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01734-y. Epub 2023 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1007/s40615-023-01734-y
PMID:37581764
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-reported data of physical activity are practical and inexpensive ways to collect data, although, subject to significant measurement errors. Most physical activity questionnaires used in the USA have been predominately validated among non-Hispanic White American populations with limited attention paid to the validity of the measures among racial/ethnic minorities. Additionally, there are limited studies that have evaluated factors related to over- and under-reporting errors linked to self-reported physical activity data, particularly among African Americans. The primary objectives of this study were to validate self-reported levels of physical activity and sedentary behavior among African-American men and women against objective measurements and to identify the factors related to under- and over-reporting.

METHODS

This study was a 7-day, cross-sectional study conducted on African-American men and women (n = 56) who were between 21-70 years of age. Participants were required to attend two study visits for the collection of self-reported and objective measurements of physical activity and sedentary behavior (VO, DEXA scan, anthropometrics, ActivPal accelerometer, resting metabolic rate (RMR) and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Overall, energy expenditure measured by ActivPal was 24.1 MET/hr/week whereas self-reported (IPAQ) energy expenditure was 52.66 MET/hr/week. Self-reported sedentary time was 40.37 h/week, whereas sedentary time measured by ActivPal was 63.03 h/week. Obese participants tended to over-report their physical activity levels more so than non-obese participants (Obese, Activpal-23.89 MET/hr/week vs IPAQ-58.98 MET/hr/week; Non-obese, Activpal - 24.48 MET/hr/week vs IPAQ - 42.55 MET/hr/week). Both obese and non-obese participants underestimated their sedentary time (Obese, Activpal - 66.89 h/week vs IPAQ-43.92 h/week; Non-obese, Activpal -56.07 h/week vs IPAQ - 33.98 h/week).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study found that the ActivPal validated physical activity and sedentary behavior among African-Americans. Self-reported data were found to be highly variable, whereas the objective assessments of physical activity and sedentary behavior had limited variability. It was also found that obese individuals over-estimated their self-reported physical activity levels and under-estimated sedentary behavior in comparison to the ActivPal. These findings strongly support the need to measure physical activity and sedentary behaviors objectively, particularly among African-Americans.

摘要

背景

体力活动的自我报告数据是收集数据的实用且廉价的方法,尽管存在显著的测量误差。在美国,大多数用于非西班牙裔白种美国人的体力活动问卷主要经过验证,但在少数族裔中,对这些测量方法的有效性关注较少。此外,很少有研究评估与自我报告体力活动数据相关的过度和过低报告错误的因素,特别是在非裔美国人中。本研究的主要目的是验证非裔美国男性和女性的体力活动和久坐行为的自我报告水平与客观测量值,并确定与过度和过低报告相关的因素。

方法

这是一项为期 7 天的横断面研究,在年龄在 21-70 岁之间的非裔美国男性和女性(n=56)中进行。参与者需要参加两次研究访问,以收集体力活动和久坐行为的自我报告和客观测量值(VO、DEXA 扫描、人体测量学、ActivPal 加速度计、静息代谢率(RMR)和国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)问卷)。

结果

总体而言,ActivPal 测量的能量消耗为 24.1 MET/hr/week,而自我报告(IPAQ)的能量消耗为 52.66 MET/hr/week。自我报告的久坐时间为 40.37 小时/周,而 ActivPal 测量的久坐时间为 63.03 小时/周。肥胖参与者比非肥胖参与者更倾向于过度报告他们的体力活动水平(肥胖者,Activpal-23.89 MET/hr/week 比 IPAQ-58.98 MET/hr/week;非肥胖者,Activpal-24.48 MET/hr/week 比 IPAQ-42.55 MET/hr/week)。肥胖和非肥胖参与者都低估了他们的久坐时间(肥胖者,Activpal-66.89 小时/周比 IPAQ-43.92 小时/周;非肥胖者,Activpal-56.07 小时/周比 IPAQ-33.98 小时/周)。

结论

本研究结果发现,ActivPal 验证了非裔美国人的体力活动和久坐行为。自我报告的数据变化很大,而体力活动和久坐行为的客观评估变化有限。研究还发现,与 ActivPal 相比,肥胖个体过度估计了他们的自我报告的体力活动水平,低估了他们的久坐行为。这些发现强烈支持需要客观地测量体力活动和久坐行为,特别是在非裔美国人中。

相似文献

1
Validation Study of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in African-American Men and Women.非裔美国男性和女性身体活动和久坐行为的验证研究。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Oct;11(5):2711-2719. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01734-y. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
2
Comparison of self-reported measure of sitting time (IPAQ) with objective measurement (activPAL).自我报告的久坐时间测量方法(国际体力活动问卷,IPAQ)与客观测量方法(活动记录仪,activPAL)的比较。
Physiol Meas. 2014 Nov;35(11):2319-28. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/11/2319. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
3
Systematic comparative validation of self-report measures of sedentary time against an objective measure of postural sitting (activPAL).系统比较基于自我报告的久坐时间测量与客观测量的姿势坐姿(activPAL)的验证。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Feb 26;15(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0652-x.
4
Validity of self-reported and objectively measured sedentary behavior in pregnancy.自我报告和客观测量妊娠期间久坐行为的有效性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2771-z.
5
Concurrent validity between self-reported International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form and Fibion accelerometer data among young adults in the UAE.在阿联酋的年轻人中,自我报告的国际体力活动问卷短表与 Fibion 加速度计数据之间的同时效度。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Aug 19;29(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01975-5.
6
Comparability of accelerometer- and IPAQ-derived physical activity and sedentary time in South Asian women: A cross-sectional study.南亚女性中加速度计和国际体力活动问卷得出的身体活动及久坐时间的可比性:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(7):655-62. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014.957728. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
7
Comparison of the Physical Activity Measured by a Consumer Wearable Activity Tracker and That Measured by Self-Report: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Health eHeart Study.消费者可穿戴活动追踪器测量的身体活动与自我报告测量的身体活动的比较:健康电子心脏研究的横断面分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Dec 29;8(12):e22090. doi: 10.2196/22090.
8
Comparison of self-report versus accelerometer - measured physical activity and sedentary behaviors and their association with body composition in Latin American countries.比较自我报告与加速度计测量的身体活动和久坐行为及其与拉丁美洲国家身体成分的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232420. eCollection 2020.
9
A Comparison of Sedentary Behavior as Measured by the Fitbit and ActivPAL in College Students.《基于 Fitbit 和 ActivPAL 对大学生久坐行为的比较研究》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 8;18(8):3914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083914.
10
A Mixed-Methods Examination of Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Overweight and Obese South Asian Men Living in the United Kingdom.对生活在英国的超重及肥胖南亚男性的身体活动和久坐时间的混合方法研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 27;14(4):348. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040348.

引用本文的文献

1
Diet Quality, Metabolic Syndrome, and Nativity Status: Elucidating Metabolic Advantage and Disadvantage Among Non-US-Native and US-Native Populations Using NHANES Data (2013-2018).饮食质量、代谢综合征与出生状态:利用美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES,2013 - 2018年)数据阐明非美国本土和美国本土人群的代谢优势与劣势
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 8;17(2):215. doi: 10.3390/nu17020215.
2
Monitoring handgrip strength to motivate lifestyle choices for patients with diabetes type 2 - a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.监测手握力以激励 2 型糖尿病患者改变生活方式 - 一项实用随机对照试验。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Dec;42(4):617-632. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2373298. Epub 2024 Jul 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Benefits and barriers to physical activity among African women: A systematic review.非洲女性进行体育活动的益处与障碍:一项系统综述。
Sports Med Health Sci. 2022 Dec 8;5(1):59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.smhs.2022.12.001. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Contributions of physical inactivity and sedentary behavior to metabolic and endocrine diseases.体力活动不足和久坐行为对代谢和内分泌疾病的影响。
Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Dec;33(12):817-827. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2022.09.002. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
3
Validity of the activPAL monitor to measure stepping activity and activity intensity: A systematic review.
《主动式活动监视器(activPAL)测量踏步行为和活动强度的有效性:系统评价》。
Gait Posture. 2022 Sep;97:165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
4
Association of Self-Reported and Device-Measured Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity with Health-Related Quality of Life among European Older Adults.自我报告的和设备测量的久坐行为和身体活动与欧洲老年人健康相关生活质量的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;18(24):13252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413252.
5
The effect of leisure time physical activity and sedentary behaviour on the health of workers with different occupational physical activity demands: a systematic review.不同职业体力活动需求的劳动者的闲暇体力活动和久坐行为对健康的影响:系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jul 20;18(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01166-z.
6
Physical activity, obesity and sedentary behavior in cancer etiology: epidemiologic evidence and biologic mechanisms.体力活动、肥胖与癌症病因学中的久坐行为:流行病学证据与生物学机制。
Mol Oncol. 2021 Mar;15(3):790-800. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12772. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
7
Sedentary Behavior and Chronic Disease: Mechanisms and Future Directions.久坐行为与慢性疾病:机制与未来方向。
J Phys Act Health. 2020 Jan 1;17(1):52-61. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0377.
8
Comparison of the Physical Activity Frequency Questionnaire (PAFQ) with accelerometry in a middle-aged and elderly population: The CoLaus study.中老年人体力活动频率问卷(PAFQ)与加速度计的比较:CoLaus 研究。
Maturitas. 2019 Nov;129:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
9
Objective vs self-report assessment of height, weight and body mass index: Relationships with adiposity, aerobic fitness and physical activity.身高、体重和体重指数的客观评估与自我报告评估:与肥胖、有氧适能和身体活动的关系
Clin Obes. 2019 Oct;9(5):e12331. doi: 10.1111/cob.12331. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
10
Correlates of Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity and Exercise Motivation in Underserved African American Men.服务不足的非裔美国男性中中等至剧烈体力活动和运动动机的相关因素。
Am J Mens Health. 2019 May-Jun;13(3):1557988319855155. doi: 10.1177/1557988319855155.