• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从提供者和使用者角度比较远程医疗与面对面咨询的接受度:皮肤科多中心横断面研究

Acceptance of Telemedicine Compared to In-Person Consultation From the Providers' and Users' Perspectives: Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study in Dermatology.

作者信息

Maul Lara Valeska, Jahn Anna Sophie, Pamplona Gustavo S P, Streit Markus, Gantenbein Lorena, Müller Simon, Nielsen Mia-Louise, Greis Christian, Navarini Alexander A, Maul Julia-Tatjana

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital/Fondation Asile des Aveugles, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

JMIR Dermatol. 2023 Aug 11;6:e45384. doi: 10.2196/45384.

DOI:10.2196/45384
PMID:37582265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10457706/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Teledermatology is currently finding its place in modern health care worldwide as a rapidly evolving field.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the acceptance of teledermatology compared to in-person consultation from the perspective of patients and professionals.

METHODS

This multicenter, cross-sectional pilot study was performed at secondary and tertiary referral centers of dermatology in Switzerland from August 2019 to January 2020. A customized questionnaire addressing demographics and educational data, experience with telemedicine, and presumed willingness to replace in-patient consultations with teledermatology was completed by dermatological patients, dermatologists, and health care workers in dermatology.

RESULTS

Among a total of 664 participants, the ones with previous telemedicine experience (171/664, 25.8%) indicated a high level of overall experience with it (patients: 73/106, 68.9%, dermatologists: 6/8, 75.0%, and health care workers: 27/34, 79.4%). Patients, dermatologists, and health care workers were most likely willing to replace in-person consultations with teledermatology for minor health issues (353/512, 68.9%; 37/45, 82.2%; and 89/107, 83.2%, respectively). We observed a higher preference for telemedicine among individuals who have already used telemedicine (patients: P<.001, dermatologists: P=.03, and health care workers, P=.005), as well as among patients with higher educational levels (P=.003).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the preference for teledermatology has a high potential to increase over time since previous experience with telemedicine and a higher level of education were associated with a higher willingness to replace in-patient consultations with telemedicine. We assume that minor skin problems are the most promising issue in teledermatology. Our findings emphasize the need for dermatologists to be actively involved in the transition to teledermatology.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04495036; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04495036.

摘要

背景

远程皮肤病学作为一个快速发展的领域,目前正在全球现代医疗保健中占据一席之地。

目的

本研究的目的是从患者和专业人员的角度调查远程皮肤病学与面对面咨询相比的接受程度。

方法

这项多中心横断面试点研究于2019年8月至2020年1月在瑞士的二级和三级皮肤科转诊中心进行。皮肤科患者、皮肤科医生和皮肤科医护人员完成了一份定制问卷,内容涉及人口统计学和教育数据、远程医疗经验以及假定的用远程皮肤病学替代门诊咨询的意愿。

结果

在总共664名参与者中,有远程医疗经验的人(171/664,25.8%)表示总体经验水平较高(患者:73/106,68.9%;皮肤科医生:6/8,75.0%;医护人员:27/34,79.4%)。患者、皮肤科医生和医护人员最有可能愿意用远程皮肤病学替代轻微健康问题的面对面咨询(分别为353/512,68.9%;37/45,82.2%;89/107,83.2%)。我们观察到,已经使用过远程医疗的个体(患者:P<0.001;皮肤科医生:P=0.03;医护人员:P=0.005)以及教育水平较高的患者(P=0.003)对远程医疗的偏好更高。

结论

本研究表明,由于以前的远程医疗经验和较高的教育水平与用远程医疗替代门诊咨询的更高意愿相关,随着时间的推移,对远程皮肤病学的偏好有很大的增加潜力。我们认为轻微皮肤问题是远程皮肤病学中最有前景的问题。我们的研究结果强调皮肤科医生需要积极参与向远程皮肤病学的转变。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04495036;https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04495036 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/134c/10457706/2aedae2e23c1/derma_v6i1e45384_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/134c/10457706/bdb2da3495df/derma_v6i1e45384_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/134c/10457706/a555d39048b2/derma_v6i1e45384_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/134c/10457706/c15c56d11077/derma_v6i1e45384_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/134c/10457706/2aedae2e23c1/derma_v6i1e45384_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/134c/10457706/bdb2da3495df/derma_v6i1e45384_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/134c/10457706/a555d39048b2/derma_v6i1e45384_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/134c/10457706/c15c56d11077/derma_v6i1e45384_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/134c/10457706/2aedae2e23c1/derma_v6i1e45384_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptance of Telemedicine Compared to In-Person Consultation From the Providers' and Users' Perspectives: Multicenter, Cross-Sectional Study in Dermatology.从提供者和使用者角度比较远程医疗与面对面咨询的接受度:皮肤科多中心横断面研究
JMIR Dermatol. 2023 Aug 11;6:e45384. doi: 10.2196/45384.
2
Teledermatology in Belgium: a pilot study.比利时的远程皮肤病学:一项试点研究。
Acta Clin Belg. 2020 Apr;75(2):116-122. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2018.1561812. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
3
Referral of Patients to Dermatology and Teledermatology Consultations in Spain. DIADERM Study.西班牙患者转诊至皮肤科及远程皮肤病学会诊。DIADERM研究。
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2019 Mar;110(2):146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
4
Awareness, acceptability, and satisfaction of teledermatology consultation among social-media users in Nepal.尼泊尔社交媒体用户对远程皮肤病学咨询的认知、可接受性和满意度。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Jul;21(7):3078-3084. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14557. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
5
Benefits of Teledermatology for Geriatric Patients: Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.老年患者远程皮肤病学的益处:基于人群的横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 21;22(4):e16700. doi: 10.2196/16700.
6
Teledermatology operational considerations, challenges, and benefits: the referring providers' perspective.远程皮肤病学的操作注意事项、挑战和益处:来自转诊医生的观点。
Telemed J E Health. 2012 Oct;18(8):580-4. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0241. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
7
Hybrid care potential of teledermatology: The importance of linking digital and physical practice and acceptance of online services: A cross-sectional study.远程皮肤病学的混合护理潜力:连接数字与实体医疗实践以及在线服务接受度的重要性:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 9;7(7):e2241. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2241. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
Reasons for Dermatology Consultations in Nursing Homes and the Estimated Potential of Teledermatology as a Triage Tool.养老院皮肤科就诊的原因及远程皮肤病学作为分诊工具的潜在估计。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2022 Nov 30;102:adv00827. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v102.4459.
9
A pilot study on tertiary teledermatology: feasibility and acceptance of telecommunication among dermatologists. tertiary teledermatology 远程皮肤病学三级服务:皮肤科医生之间通信的可行性和可接受性的初步研究
J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(8):447-53. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.091205. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
10
Improving cooperation between general practitioners and dermatologists via telemedicine: study protocol of the cluster-randomized controlled TeleDerm study.通过远程医疗改善全科医生与皮肤科医生之间的合作:整群随机对照TeleDerm研究方案
Trials. 2018 Oct 24;19(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2955-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Acceptability, Barriers, and Facilitators for Digital Health in Dermatology: Qualitative Focus Groups With Dermatologists, Nurses, and Patients.探索皮肤科数字健康的可接受性、障碍和促进因素:皮肤科医生、护士和患者的定性焦点小组。
JMIR Dermatol. 2024 Sep 3;7:e57172. doi: 10.2196/57172.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Satisfaction in Teledermatology: an Updated Review.远程皮肤病学中的患者满意度:最新综述
Curr Dermatol Rep. 2023;12(1):23-26. doi: 10.1007/s13671-023-00382-z. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
2
Informing the Debate about Telemedicine Reimbursement - What Do We Need to Know?为远程医疗报销辩论提供信息——我们需要了解什么?
N Engl J Med. 2022 Nov 17;387(20):1821-1823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2210790. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
3
Asynchronous tele-expertise (ASTE) for prenatal diagnosis is feasible and cost saving: Results of a French case study.
远程产前诊断的异步专家咨询(ASTE)是可行且具有成本效益的:法国案例研究结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 1;17(8):e0269477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269477. eCollection 2022.
4
Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Systematic Review.《COVID-19 大流行期间的远程医疗患者满意度:系统评价》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 17;19(10):6113. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106113.
5
Acceptance and use of telemedicine technology by health professionals: Development of a conceptual model.医疗专业人员对远程医疗技术的接受与应用:一个概念模型的构建
Digit Health. 2022 Feb 21;8:20552076221081693. doi: 10.1177/20552076221081693. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
6
Patients' preferences for telemedicine versus in-clinic consultation in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,患者在初级保健中对远程医疗与门诊咨询的偏好。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Feb 22;23(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01640-y.
7
Modifying UTAUT2 for a cross-country comparison of telemedicine adoption.调整统一技术接受与使用模型2以进行远程医疗采用情况的跨国比较。
Comput Human Behav. 2022 May;130:107183. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2022.107183. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
8
Patients' Perceptions and Satisfaction with the Outpatient Telemedicine Clinics during COVID-19 Era in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯新冠疫情期间患者对门诊远程医疗诊所的认知与满意度:一项横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;9(12):1739. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121739.
9
France extends its tele-expertise funding model nationally after COVID-19.新冠疫情之后,法国在全国范围内推广其远程专业知识资助模式。
J Telemed Telecare. 2022 Apr;28(3):233-235. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211067067. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
10
Telemedicine use among neurologists before and during COVID-19 pandemic.神经科医生在 COVID-19 大流行前后的远程医疗使用情况。
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2021 Jul;79(7):658-664. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0488.