Elliott Meghan J, Donald Maoliosa, Farragher Janine, Verdin Nancy, Love Shannan, Manns Kate, Baragar Brigitte, Sparkes Dwight, Fox Danielle, Hemmelgarn Brenda R
Departments of Medicine (Elliott, Love, Manns) and Community Health Sciences (Elliott, Donald, Fox), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy (Farragher), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Medicine Strategic Clinical Network (Verdin), Alberta Health Services; Patient and Community Engagement Research (PaCER) Program (Verdin), O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Patient Partner (Verdin, Sparkes), Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD) Network, Vancouver, BC; Max Rady College of Medicine (Baragar), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry (Hemmelgarn), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta.
CMAJ Open. 2023 Aug 15;11(4):E736-E744. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220171. Print 2023 Jul-Aug.
Peer support can address the informational and emotional needs of people living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and enable self-management. We aimed to identify preferences and priorities for content, format and processes of peer support delivery for patients with non-dialysis CKD and their loved ones.
Using a patient-oriented research approach, we conducted a half-day, virtual consensus workshop with stakeholder participants from across Canada, including patients, caregivers, peer mentors and clinicians. Using personas (fictional characters), participants discussed and voted on preferences for delivery of peer support across format, content and process categories. We analyzed transcripts from small- and large-group discussions inductively using content analysis.
Twenty-one stakeholders, including 9 patients and 4 caregivers, participated in the workshop. In the voting exercise on format, participants prioritized peer mentor matching, programming for both patients and caregivers, and flexible scheduling. For content, participants prioritized informational and emotional support focus, and for process, they prioritized leveraging kidney care programs and alternative sources (e.g., social media) for promotion and referral. Analysis of workshop transcripts complemented prioritization results and emphasized tailoring of peer support delivery to accommodate the diversity of people living with CKD and their support needs. This concept was elaborated in 3 themes, namely alignment of program features with needs, inclusive peer support options and multiple access points.
We identified preferences for peer support delivery for people living with CKD and underscore the importance of tailored, flexible programming in this context. Findings could be used to develop, adapt or study CKD-focused peer support interventions.
同伴支持可以满足慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的信息和情感需求,并促进自我管理。我们旨在确定非透析CKD患者及其亲人对同伴支持的内容、形式和流程的偏好及优先事项。
采用以患者为导向的研究方法,我们与来自加拿大各地的利益相关者参与者,包括患者、护理人员、同伴导师和临床医生,举办了一场为期半天的虚拟共识研讨会。参与者使用人物角色(虚构角色),就同伴支持在形式、内容和流程类别方面的提供偏好进行了讨论和投票。我们使用内容分析法对小组和大组讨论的文字记录进行了归纳分析。
21名利益相关者,包括9名患者和4名护理人员,参加了研讨会。在形式的投票环节中,参与者将同伴导师匹配、针对患者和护理人员的项目安排以及灵活的时间安排列为优先事项。对于内容,参与者将信息和情感支持重点列为优先事项,对于流程,他们将利用肾脏护理项目和其他来源(如社交媒体)进行推广和推荐列为优先事项。对研讨会文字记录的分析补充了优先排序结果,并强调了同伴支持的提供应根据CKD患者及其支持需求的多样性进行调整。这一概念在三个主题中得到了阐述,即项目特征与需求的匹配、包容性的同伴支持选项和多个接入点。
我们确定了CKD患者对同伴支持的偏好,并强调了在这种情况下进行量身定制、灵活安排项目的重要性。研究结果可用于开发、调整或研究以CKD为重点的同伴支持干预措施。