Güler Ayşe, Lee Rebecca C, Rojas-Guyler Liliana, Lambert Joshua, Smith Carolyn R
College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
College of Education, Criminal Justice, and Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Nurs Inq. 2023 Oct;30(4):e12589. doi: 10.1111/nin.12589. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
Sociocultural norms against women can contribute to promoting intimate partner violence (IPV) and shape women's decision to disclose IPV. A cross-cultural analysis of the existing literature is needed to present an overview of the influences of sociocultural norms on women's decisions regarding the disclosure of IPV across different cultural contexts. The purpose of the review was to synthesize published quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (MMs) studies to identify known sociocultural norms across different cultures that may influence women's decision to disclose IPV. The Whittemore and Knafl framework, Rayyan software, and PRISMA flow diagram were used. Databases included APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed, SocINDEX, and Women's Studies International. The quality of studies was assessed by the MMs appraisal tool. A total of 15 research articles written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals were included. Main categories emerged: (1) stigma surrounding IPV disclosure, victimization, and divorce; (2) gender roles; (3) preserving family honor; and (4) Children's well-being and future. A one-size-fits-all approach is not adequate for women who are considering disclosing IPV. Findings underscore that regardless of residing in individualistic countries, those sociocultural norms related to traditional gender roles and gender inequality are still important barriers to the disclosure of IPV among women with collectivist roots.
针对女性的社会文化规范可能会助长亲密伴侣暴力行为(IPV),并影响女性披露亲密伴侣暴力行为的决定。需要对现有文献进行跨文化分析,以概述社会文化规范在不同文化背景下对女性披露亲密伴侣暴力行为决定的影响。本综述的目的是综合已发表的定量、定性和混合方法(MMs)研究,以确定不同文化中可能影响女性披露亲密伴侣暴力行为决定的已知社会文化规范。使用了惠特莫尔和克纳夫框架、Rayyan软件以及PRISMA流程图。数据库包括美国心理学会心理学文摘数据库(APA PsycInfo)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、医学期刊数据库(PubMed)、社会科学索引数据库(SocINDEX)以及国际妇女研究数据库。研究质量通过混合方法评估工具进行评估。总共纳入了15篇用英文撰写并发表在同行评审期刊上的研究文章。出现了主要类别:(1)围绕亲密伴侣暴力行为披露、受害和离婚的污名;(2)性别角色;(3)维护家庭荣誉;(4)儿童的幸福和未来。一刀切的方法不适用于考虑披露亲密伴侣暴力行为的女性。研究结果强调,无论居住在个人主义国家,那些与传统性别角色和性别不平等相关的社会文化规范仍然是有集体主义根源的女性披露亲密伴侣暴力行为的重要障碍。