Centre for the advancement of Scholarships, University of Pretoria.
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Maseno University, Kenya.
Afr J Reprod Health. 2023 May;27(5s):71-81. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2023/v27i5s.9.
Kenya introduced free maternity services (FMS) in 2013 to enable all pregnant women to give birth for free in all government public health facilities. Currently, Kenya is rolling out universal health coverage (UHC), which has been acknowledged as a priority goal for every health system and part of the 'Big Four Agenda' for sustainable national development in Kenya. FMS is one of the core services in Kenya, but since its launch, it is not clear whether the decentralized approach chosen to implement FMS is leading to UHC. This nine-month ethnographic study in Kilifi County, Kenya, was conducted between March-July 2016 and February-July 2017. A narrative approach to analysis was applied. In this article, we interrogate local perceptions of participation during the crafting and implementation of FMS. Findings show that FMS was detached from local realities, and this was a major inadequacy of the top to bottom approach. FMS did not consider local power relations and bargaining power which are requisites during policy formulation and implementation. The participants expressed desire for more localized control over resources from the national government. The findings suggest that as UHC is rolled out in Kenya, consultation of local stakeholders at the grassroots by the state departments would likely improve maternal healthcare outcomes. Such consultations must take into consideration differences in bargaining power and local power relations. Borrowing from the basic tenets of the recent anthropological theorization of constitutionality, this article proposes a bottom to top approach that leverages and integrates local views during policy-making process to create trust, a sense of ownership and accountability.
肯尼亚于 2013 年引入免费产妇保健服务(FMS),以使所有孕妇都能在所有政府公共卫生机构免费分娩。目前,肯尼亚正在推行全民健康覆盖(UHC),这已被确认为每个卫生系统的优先目标,也是肯尼亚可持续国家发展“四大议程”的一部分。FMS 是肯尼亚的核心服务之一,但自推出以来,尚不清楚为实施 FMS 而选择的权力下放方法是否会导致全民健康覆盖。这项在肯尼亚基利菲县进行的为期九个月的民族志研究于 2016 年 3 月至 7 月和 2017 年 2 月至 7 月进行。采用叙述方法进行分析。在本文中,我们探讨了当地在制定和实施 FMS 过程中的参与观念。研究结果表明,FMS 与当地现实脱节,这是自上而下方法的主要缺陷。FMS 没有考虑到在政策制定和实施过程中所需的地方权力关系和讨价还价能力。参与者表示希望从国家政府对资源拥有更多本地化的控制权。研究结果表明,随着肯尼亚全民健康覆盖的推出,国家部门在基层与当地利益相关者进行协商可能会改善产妇保健结果。这种协商必须考虑到讨价还价能力和地方权力关系的差异。本文借鉴了最近人类学对宪法性的理论化的基本原则,提出了一种自下而上的方法,利用和整合政策制定过程中的地方观点,以建立信任、所有权和问责制。