Xing Zhaoquan, Ji Meng, Shan Yi, Dong Zhaogang, Xu Xiaofei
Department of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Ji'nan, China.
The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 16;7:e43345. doi: 10.2196/43345.
Bladder cancer is a leading cause of death among Chinese male populations in recent years. The health locus of control construct can mediate health status and outcomes, and it has proven helpful in predicting and explaining specific health-related behaviors. However, it has never been used to investigate health beliefs about bladder cancer prevention and treatment.
This study aimed to classify male patients into different latent groups according to their beliefs about bladder cancer prevention and treatment and to identify associated factors to provide implications for the delivery of tailored education and interventions and the administration of targeted prevention and treatment.
First, we designed a four-section questionnaire to solicit data: section 1-age, gender, and education; section 2-the communicative subscale of the All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale; section 3-the eHealth Literacy Scale; and section 4-health beliefs about bladder cancer prevention and treatment measured by the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale Form C. We hypothesized that the participants' health beliefs about bladder cancer prevention and treatment measured in section 4 could be closely associated with information collected through sections 1 to 3. We recruited 718 Chinese male patients from Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, China, and invited them to participate in a web-based questionnaire survey. Finally, we used latent class analysis to identify subgroups of men based on their categorical responses to the items on the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control Scale Form C and ascertained factors contributing to the low self-efficacy group identified.
We identified 2 subgroups defined as low and moderate self-efficacy groups representing 75.8% (544/718) and 24.2% (174/718) of the total sample, respectively. Men in the low self-efficacy cluster (cluster 1: 544/718, 75.8%) were less likely to believe in their own capability or doctors' advice to achieve optimal outcomes in bladder cancer prevention and treatment. Men in the moderate self-efficacy cluster (cluster 2: 174/718, 24.2%) had distinct psychological traits. They had stronger beliefs in their own capability to manage their health with regard to bladder cancer prevention and treatment and moderate to high levels of trust in health and medical professionals and their advice to achieve better prevention and treatment outcomes. Four factors contributing to low self-efficacy were identified, including limited education (Year 6 to Year 12), aged ≥44 years, limited communicative health literacy, and limited digital health literacy.
This was the first study investigating beliefs about bladder cancer prevention and treatment among Chinese male patients. Given that bladder cancer represents a leading cause of death among Chinese male populations in recent years, the low self-efficacy cluster and associated contributing factors identified in this study can provide implications for clinical practice, health education, medical research, and health policy-making.
膀胱癌是近年来中国男性人群的主要死因之一。健康控制点结构可以调节健康状况和结果,并且已被证明有助于预测和解释特定的健康相关行为。然而,它从未被用于调查关于膀胱癌预防和治疗的健康信念。
本研究旨在根据男性患者对膀胱癌预防和治疗的信念将其分为不同的潜在组,并确定相关因素,为提供量身定制的教育和干预措施以及实施有针对性的预防和治疗提供启示。
首先,我们设计了一份包含四个部分的问卷来收集数据:第一部分——年龄、性别和教育程度;第二部分——健康素养量表各方面的沟通子量表;第三部分——电子健康素养量表;第四部分——通过多维健康控制点量表C型测量的关于膀胱癌预防和治疗的健康信念。我们假设在第四部分测量的参与者对膀胱癌预防和治疗的健康信念可能与通过第一至第三部分收集的信息密切相关。我们从山东大学齐鲁医院招募了718名中国男性患者,并邀请他们参加基于网络的问卷调查。最后,我们使用潜在类别分析根据男性对多维健康控制点量表C型项目的分类回答来识别亚组,并确定导致所识别的低自我效能组的因素。
我们识别出两个亚组,分别定义为低自我效能组和中等自我效能组,分别占总样本的75.8%(544/718)和24.2%(174/718)。低自我效能组(第1组:544/718,75.8%)的男性不太相信自己有能力或听从医生的建议在膀胱癌预防和治疗中取得最佳结果。中等自我效能组(第2组:174/718,24.2%)的男性具有不同的心理特征。他们更相信自己有能力在膀胱癌预防和治疗方面管理自己的健康,并且对健康和医疗专业人员及其实现更好预防和治疗结果的建议有中等至高程度的信任。确定了导致低自我效能的四个因素,包括教育程度有限(6年级至12年级)、年龄≥44岁、沟通健康素养有限和数字健康素养有限。
这是第一项调查中国男性患者对膀胱癌预防和治疗信念的研究。鉴于膀胱癌是近年来中国男性人群的主要死因之一,本研究中识别出的低自我效能组及相关促成因素可为临床实践、健康教育、医学研究和卫生政策制定提供启示。