Livergant Rachel J, Stefanyk Kelsey, Binda Catherine, Fraulin Georgia, Maleki Sasha, Sibbeston Sarah, Joharifard Shahrzad, Hillier Tracey, Joos Emilie
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Aug 16;3(8):e0001805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001805. eCollection 2023.
Indigenous Peoples across North America and Oceania experience worse health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous people, including increased post-operative mortality. Several gaps in data exist regarding global differences in surgical morbidity and mortality for Indigenous populations based on geographic locations and across surgical specialties. The aim of this study is to evaluate disparities in post-operative outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Eight electronic databases were searched with no language restriction. Studies reporting on Indigenous populations outside of Canada, the USA, New Zealand, or Australia, or on interventional procedures were excluded. Primary outcomes were post-operative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes included reoperations, readmission rates, and length of hospital stay. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. Eighty-four unique observational studies were included in this review. Of these, 67 studies were included in the meta-analysis (Oceania n = 31, North America n = 36). Extensive heterogeneity existed among studies and 50% were of poor quality. Indigenous patients had 1.26 times odds of post-operative morbidity (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.10-1.44, p<0.01) and 1.34 times odds of post-operative infection (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.12-1.59, p<0.01) than non-Indigenous patients. Indigenous patients also had 1.33 times odds of reoperation (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.02-1.74, p = 0.04). In conclusion, we found that Indigenous patients in North American and Oceania experience significantly poorer surgical outcomes than their non-Indigenous counterparts. Additionally, there is a low proportion of high-quality research focusing on assessing surgical equity for Indigenous patients in these regions, despite multiple international and national calls to action for reconciliation and decolonization to improve quality surgical care for Indigenous populations.
与非原住民相比,北美和大洋洲的原住民健康状况更差,包括术后死亡率增加。基于地理位置和不同外科专科,关于原住民人群手术发病率和死亡率的全球差异,数据存在若干空白。本研究的目的是评估原住民和非原住民人群术后结局的差异。本系统评价和荟萃分析按照PRISMA和MOOSE指南进行。检索了八个电子数据库,无语言限制。排除了关于加拿大、美国、新西兰或澳大利亚以外的原住民人群或干预性手术的研究报告。主要结局为术后发病率和死亡率。次要结局包括再次手术、再入院率和住院时间。采用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表进行质量评估。本评价纳入了84项独特的观察性研究。其中,67项研究纳入荟萃分析(大洋洲n = 31,北美n = 36)。各研究之间存在广泛的异质性,50%的研究质量较差。与非原住民患者相比,原住民患者术后发病几率高1.26倍(OR = 1.26,95%CI:1.10 - 1.44,p<0.01),术后感染几率高1.34倍(OR = 1.34,95%CI:1.12 - 1.59,p<0.01)。原住民患者再次手术的几率也高1.33倍(OR = 1.33,95%CI:1.02 - 1.74,p = 0.04)。总之,我们发现北美和大洋洲的原住民患者手术结局明显比非原住民患者差。此外,尽管国际和国内多次呼吁采取行动实现和解与非殖民化,以改善原住民人群的优质手术护理,但关注评估这些地区原住民患者手术公平性的高质量研究比例较低。