Wolfe Jared, Kamen Scott, Koneru Manisha, Vigilante Nicholas, Rana Ankit, Penckofer Mary, Hester Taryn, Oak Solomon, Patel Karan, Thau Lauren, Sprankle Kenyon, Kim Kelly, Thomas Kavya, Zhang Linda, Siegler James E
Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, United States.
Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, United States.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2023 Oct;32(10):107264. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107264. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
Prior studies have elucidated a relationship between nonstenotic plaque in patients with cryptogenic embolic infarcts with a largely cortical topology, however, it is unclear if nonstenotic cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) plaque is relevant in subcortical cryptogenic infarct patterns.
A nested cohort of consecutive patients with anterior, unilateral, and subcortical infarcts without an identifiable embolic source were identified from a prospective stroke registry (September 2019 - June 2021). Patients with extracranial stenosis >50% or cardiac sources of embolism were excluded. Patients with computed tomography angiography were included and comparisons were made according to the infarct pattern being lacunar versus non-lacunar. Prevalence estimates for cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) plaque presence were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and differences in plaque thickness and features were compared between sides.
Of the 1684 who were screened, 141 met inclusion criteria (n=80 due to small vessel disease, n=61 cryptogenic). The median age was 66y (interquartile range, IQR 58-73) and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 3 (IQR 1-5). There was a higher probability of finding excess plaque ipsilateral to the stroke (41.1%, 95% CI 33.3-49.3%) than finding excess contralateral plaque (29.1%, 95% CI 22.2-37.1%; p=0.03), but this was driven by patients with non-lacunar infarcts (excess ipsilateral vs. contralateral plaque frequency of 49.2% vs. 14.8%, p<0.001) rather than lacunar infarcts (35.0% vs. 40.0%, p=0.51).
The probability of finding ipsilateral, nonstenotic carotid plaque in patients with subcortical cryptogenic strokes exceeds the probability of contralateral plaque and is driven by larger subcortical infarcts, classically defined as being cryptogenic. Approximately 1 in 3 unilateral anterior subcortical infarcts may be due to nonstenotic ICA plaque.
先前的研究已经阐明了在具有主要为皮质拓扑结构的隐源性栓塞性梗死患者中,非狭窄斑块之间的关系,然而,尚不清楚非狭窄的颈内动脉(ICA)斑块在皮质下隐源性梗死模式中是否相关。
从前瞻性卒中登记处(2019年9月至2021年6月)中确定一组连续的前循环、单侧和皮质下梗死且无明确栓塞源的患者队列。排除颅外狭窄>50%或有心脏栓塞源的患者。纳入接受计算机断层血管造影的患者,并根据梗死模式是否为腔隙性与非腔隙性进行比较。估计颈内动脉(ICA)斑块存在的患病率,并计算95%置信区间(CI),比较两侧斑块厚度和特征的差异。
在1684名接受筛查的患者中,141名符合纳入标准(80名因小血管疾病,61名隐源性)。中位年龄为66岁(四分位间距,IQR 58 - 73),美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分为3分(IQR 1 - 5)。与发现对侧斑块过多(29.1%,95% CI 22.2 - 37.1%;p = 0.03)相比,发现卒中同侧斑块过多的可能性更高(41.1%,95% CI 33.3 - 49.3%),但这是由非腔隙性梗死患者驱动的(同侧与对侧斑块过多频率分别为49.2%对14.8%,p < 0.001),而非腔隙性梗死患者(35.0%对40.0%,p = 0.51)。
在皮质下隐源性卒中患者中发现同侧非狭窄颈动脉斑块的可能性超过对侧斑块,并且由典型定义为隐源性的较大皮质下梗死驱动。大约三分之一的单侧前循环皮质下梗死可能归因于非狭窄的ICA斑块。