Suppr超能文献

一种在家中客观化嗅觉和味觉障碍的快速测试:用于验证化学感觉感知测试的概念验证。

A quick test to objectify smell and taste dysfunction at home: a proof of concept for the validation of the chemosensory perception test.

机构信息

Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.

Department of Speech and Language Pathology, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Chem Senses. 2023 Jan 1;48. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjad033.

Abstract

Recent studies have shown the efficacy of a home test for the self-evaluation of olfactory and gustatory functions in quarantined coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients. However, testing was often limited to COVID-19 participants, and the accuracy of home test kits was rarely compared to standardized testing. This study aims at providing proof of concept for the validation of the new Chemosensory Perception Test (CPT) developed to remotely assess orthonasal olfactory, retronasal olfactory, and gustatory functions in various populations using common North American household items. In the 2 experiments, a total of 121 participants irrespective of having olfactory and/or gustatory complaints from various causes (COVID-19, sinunasal, post-viral, idiopathic) were tested first, with one or many of the following tests: (i) a brief chemosensory questionnaire, (ii) an olfactory test-Sniffin' Sticks Test (SST) or University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), and/or (iii) a gustatory test-Brief Waterless Empirical Taste Test (B-WETT). We then applied the CPT which yielded 3 different subscores, namely orthonasal, retronasal, and gustatory CPT scores. The orthonasal CPT score was significantly correlated with SST (ρ = 0.837, P < 0.001) and UPSIT (ρ = 0.364, P < 0.001) scores, and exhibited an excellent accuracy to identify olfactory dysfunction (OD) as compared to SST (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.923 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.822-1.000], P < 0.001). The retronasal CPT score but not the gustatory CPT score allowed to distinguish between participants with or without subjective gustatory complaint (AUC: 0.818 [95% CI, 0.726-0.909], P < 0.001). The CPT has the ability to identify OD and to quantify subjective gustatory complaints.

摘要

最近的研究表明,一种用于自我评估 COVID-19 隔离患者嗅觉和味觉功能的家庭测试具有疗效。然而,测试通常仅限于 COVID-19 参与者,并且家庭测试试剂盒的准确性很少与标准化测试进行比较。本研究旨在提供新概念验证,即开发新的嗅觉味觉感知测试(CPT),使用常见的北美家用物品远程评估各种人群的鼻前嗅觉、鼻后嗅觉和味觉功能。在这 2 项实验中,共测试了 121 名参与者,无论他们是否有嗅觉和/或味觉主诉(COVID-19、鼻窦、病毒后、特发性),他们接受了以下测试中的一项或多项:(i)简短的嗅觉味觉问卷、(ii)嗅觉测试-Sniffin' Sticks 测试(SST)或宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(UPSIT),和/或(iii)味觉测试-简短无水经验味觉测试(B-WETT)。然后,我们应用 CPT,得出 3 个不同的子分数,即鼻前、鼻后和味觉 CPT 分数。鼻前 CPT 分数与 SST(ρ=0.837,P<0.001)和 UPSIT(ρ=0.364,P<0.001)分数显著相关,并表现出与 SST 相比识别嗅觉功能障碍(OD)的出色准确性(曲线下面积[AUC]:0.923[95%置信区间{CI},0.822-1.000],P<0.001)。鼻后 CPT 分数而非味觉 CPT 分数可以区分有或没有主观味觉主诉的参与者(AUC:0.818[95%CI,0.726-0.909],P<0.001)。CPT 具有识别 OD 和量化主观味觉主诉的能力。

相似文献

3
COVID-19: Recovery from Chemosensory Dysfunction. A Multicentre study on Smell and Taste.
Laryngoscope. 2021 May;131(5):1095-1100. doi: 10.1002/lary.29383. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
4
Symptoms of Depression in Patients with Chemosensory Disorders.
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2021;83(3):135-143. doi: 10.1159/000513751. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
5
Correlations between gustatory, trigeminal, and olfactory functions and nasal airflow.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Sep;280(9):4101-4109. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07962-6. Epub 2023 May 2.
6
Long-Term Taste and Smell Outcomes After COVID-19.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e247818. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.7818.
7
Chemosensory Functions After Glossectomy-A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.
Laryngoscope. 2023 Feb;133(2):375-382. doi: 10.1002/lary.30454. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
8
Olfactory and gustatory function in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010 Sep-Oct;24(5):e93-7. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3506.
9
Olfactory and gustatory functions in bipolar disorders: A systematic review.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Sep;80:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Factors associated with impaired psychophysical gustatory function.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2024 May;49(3):306-313. doi: 10.1111/coa.14143. Epub 2024 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Variant-specific symptoms of COVID-19 in a study of 1,542,510 adults in England.
Nat Commun. 2022 Nov 11;13(1):6856. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34244-2.
2
An olfactory self-test effectively screens for COVID-19.
Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Apr 5;2:34. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00095-7. eCollection 2022.
6
Taste loss as a distinct symptom of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chem Senses. 2022 Jan 1;47. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjac001.
7
Development and Validation of a Novel At-home Smell Assessment.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Mar 1;148(3):252-258. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.3994.
8
What about using sniffin' sticks 12 items test to screen post-COVID-19 olfactory disorders?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul;279(7):3477-3484. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-07148-y. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
9
The taste of the pandemic-contemporary review on the current state of research on gustation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Feb;12(2):210-216. doi: 10.1002/alr.22902. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验