• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Regional perspectives on the coordination and delivery of paediatric end-of-life care in the UK: a qualitative study.英国儿科临终关怀协调和提供的区域视角:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Aug 16;22(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01238-w.
2
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
3
Learnings from the establishment and delivery of the UK Collaborative Paediatric Palliative Care Research Network.从英国儿童姑息治疗协作研究网络的建立与实施中获得的经验教训。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Feb 26:1-9. doi: 10.3310/VRFT5679.
4
Healthcare professionals' perspectives of providing end-of-life care for infants, children and young people in acute settings: A multi-site qualitative study.医疗保健专业人员对在急性病环境中为婴儿、儿童和青少年提供临终关怀的看法:一项多地点定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2025 Apr;39(4):483-498. doi: 10.1177/02692163251320204. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
5
Building capability in paediatric palliative care and enhancing education through the voice of parents: the Quality of Care Collaborative Australia.通过家长之声培养儿科姑息治疗能力并加强教育:澳大利亚护理质量协作组织
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2022 Oct 6;16:26323524221128835. doi: 10.1177/26323524221128835. eCollection 2022.
6
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
7
Thinking ahead about medical treatments in advanced illness: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers in end-of-life care planning with patients and families from ethnically diverse backgrounds.预先思考晚期疾病的医疗治疗:对不同种族背景的终末期患者和家庭进行临终关怀规划的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jun;11(7):1-135. doi: 10.3310/JVFW4781.
8
Barriers to initiating and implementing palliative and end-of-life care for children with life-limiting conditions: a mixed-methods study in a UK children's hospital.有生命限制的儿童开展姑息治疗和临终关怀的障碍:英国一家儿童医院的混合方法研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2024 Sep 25;109(10):842-848. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-326776.
9
Exploring the rewards and challenges of paediatric palliative care work - a qualitative study of a multi-disciplinary children's hospice care team.探索儿科姑息治疗工作的回报和挑战 - 多学科儿童临终关怀团队的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Dec 16;16(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0254-4.
10
Understanding aims, successes and challenges of palliative care and homelessness initiatives across the UK: an exploratory study.了解英国姑息治疗与无家可归者救助计划的目标、成效与挑战:一项探索性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 25;14(1):e075498. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075498.

引用本文的文献

1
What Constitutes High-Quality Paediatric Palliative Care? A Qualitative Exploration of the Perspectives of Children, Young People, and Parents.什么构成高质量的儿童姑息治疗?对儿童、青少年和家长观点的定性探索。
Patient. 2025 May 25. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00744-8.
2
Mending the gaps: A systems-focused rapid review on paediatric palliative care for health leaders.弥补差距:针对卫生领导者的以系统为重点的儿科姑息治疗快速综述。
Healthc Manage Forum. 2025 Mar 11;38(4):8404704251322481. doi: 10.1177/08404704251322481.

本文引用的文献

1
End of life care for infants, children and young people (ENHANCE): Protocol for a mixed methods evaluation of current practice in the United Kingdom [version 1; peer review: 2 approved].婴儿、儿童和青少年临终关怀(ENHANCE):英国当前实践混合方法评估方案[第1版;同行评审:2人批准]
NIHR Open Res. 2022 May 13;2:37. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13273.1.
2
Addressing inequitable access to hospice care.解决临终关怀服务获取不平等的问题。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Jun 16;12(3):302-4. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003590.
3
David Oliver: A new legal duty to provide specialist palliative care.大卫·奥利弗:提供专科姑息治疗的新法律义务。
BMJ. 2022 May 11;377:o1146. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1146.
4
Location of end-of-life care of children with cancer: A systematic review of parent experiences.癌症患儿临终关怀的地点:对家长经历的系统评价
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Jun;69(6):e29621. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29621. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
5
Winners and Losers in Palliative Care Service Delivery: Time for a Public Health Approach to Palliative and End of Life Care.姑息治疗服务提供中的赢家与输家:是时候采用公共卫生方法来提供姑息治疗和临终关怀了。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 23;9(12):1615. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121615.
6
Facilitators and barriers to the delivery of palliative care to children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: a qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of healthcare professionals.为患有危及生命和有生命危险疾病的儿童提供姑息治疗的促进因素和障碍:对医疗保健专业人员的经历和看法的定性研究
Arch Dis Child. 2022 Jan;107(1):59-64. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-321808. Epub 2021 May 12.
7
Development of a managed clinical network for children's palliative care - a qualitative evaluation.为儿童姑息治疗开发管理式临床网络 - 定性评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jan 22;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00712-7.
8
Sociodemographic Disparities in Access to Hospice and Palliative Care: An Integrative Review.社会人口学差异对临终关怀和姑息治疗的影响:综合评价。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Nov;38(11):1378-1390. doi: 10.1177/1049909120985419. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
9
Factors associated with health professionals decision to initiate paediatric advance care planning: A systematic integrative review.与医疗专业人员启动儿科预立医疗计划决策相关的因素:一项系统综合综述。
Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;35(3):503-528. doi: 10.1177/0269216320983197. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
10
Estimating the current and future prevalence of life-limiting conditions in children in England.估算英格兰儿童生命限制状况的当前和未来流行率。
Palliat Med. 2021 Oct;35(9):1641-1651. doi: 10.1177/0269216320975308. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

英国儿科临终关怀协调和提供的区域视角:一项定性研究。

Regional perspectives on the coordination and delivery of paediatric end-of-life care in the UK: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Martin House Research Centre, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, York, UK.

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Aug 16;22(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01238-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-023-01238-w
PMID:37587514
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10428585/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Provision of and access to paediatric end-of-life care is inequitable, but previous research on this area has focused on perspectives of health professionals in specific settings or children with specific conditions. This qualitative study aimed to explore regional perspectives of the successes, and challenges to the equitable coordination and delivery of end-of-life care for children in the UK. The study provides an overarching perspective on the challenges of delivering and coordinating end-of-life care for children in the UK, and the impact of these on health professionals and organisations. Previous research has not highlighted the successes in the sector, such as the formal and informal coordination of care between different services and sectors.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with Chairs of the regional Palliative Care Networks across the UK. Chairs or co-Chairs (n = 19) of 15/16 Networks were interviewed between October-December 2021. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three main themes were identified: one standalone theme ("Communication during end-of-life care"); and two overarching themes ("Getting end-of-life services and staff in the right place", with two themes: "Access to, and staffing of end-of-life care" and "Inconsistent and insufficient funding for end-of-life care services"; and "Linking up healthcare provision", with three sub-themes: "Coordination successes", "Role of the networks", and "Coordination challenges"). Good end-of-life care was facilitated through collaborative and network approaches to service provision, and effective communication with families. The implementation of 24/7 advice lines and the formalisation of joint-working arrangements were highlighted as a way to address the current challenges in the specialism.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings demonstrate how informal and formal relationships between organisations and individuals, enabled early communication with families, and collaborative working with specialist services. Formalising these could increase knowledge and awareness of end of life care, improve staff confidence, and overall improve professionals' experiences of delivering care, and families' experiences of receiving it. There are considerable positives that come from collaborative working between different organisations and sectors, and care could be improved if these approaches are funded and formalised. There needs to be consistent funding for paediatric palliative care and there is a clear need for education and training to improve staff knowledge and confidence.

摘要

背景

儿科临终关怀的提供和可及性存在不平等,但先前该领域的研究侧重于特定环境下卫生专业人员或特定疾病儿童的观点。本定性研究旨在探讨英国区域视角下,实现儿童临终关怀公平协调和提供所面临的成功与挑战。本研究从整体上阐述了为英国儿童提供和协调临终关怀所面临的挑战,以及这些挑战对卫生专业人员和组织的影响。先前的研究并未强调该领域的成功之处,例如不同服务和部门之间的护理正式和非正式协调。

方法

对英国各地区域姑息治疗网络主席进行半结构化访谈。2021 年 10 月至 12 月期间,对 15/16 个网络中的 19 位主席或联合主席进行了访谈。使用主题分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

确定了三个主要主题:一个独立主题(“临终关怀期间的沟通”);两个总体主题(“使临终关怀服务和人员到位”,包含两个主题:“临终关怀的获取和人员配备”和“临终关怀服务的资金不一致且不足”);以及“医疗服务提供的衔接”,包含三个子主题:“协调的成功”、“网络的作用”和“协调的挑战”)。良好的临终关怀是通过提供服务的协作和网络方法以及与家庭的有效沟通来实现的。24/7 咨询热线的实施和联合工作安排的正式化被强调为解决该专业当前挑战的一种方式。

结论

研究结果表明,组织和个人之间的非正式和正式关系如何促进与家庭的早期沟通,并与专科服务进行协作。将这些正式化可以提高对临终关怀的认识和了解,增强员工信心,并整体改善专业人员提供护理的体验以及家庭接受护理的体验。不同组织和部门之间的协作带来了可观的积极成果,如果这些方法得到资金支持和正式化,护理质量可以得到提高。儿科姑息治疗需要有持续的资金支持,并且显然需要教育和培训来提高员工的知识和信心。