Marigi Erick M, Kennon Justin C, Dholakia Ruchita, Visscher Sue L, Borah Bijan J, Sanchez-Sotelo Joaquin, Sperling John W
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2021 Feb 19;1(2):84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.01.002. eCollection 2021 May.
HYPOTHESIS/BACKGROUND: Value-based healthcare delivery models are becoming increasingly common and are driving cost effectiveness initiatives. Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a commonly performed procedure with some variations on the specific surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive analysis of the cost, complications, and readmission rates of 3 categories of RCR techniques (open [oRCR], combined arthroscopically assisted and mini-open [CRCR], and all arthroscopic [ARCR]) at a high-volume institution.
All RCR procedures performed by 2 fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons at a single institution between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively identified. These consisted of oRCR, CRCR, and ARCR repair techniques. One surgeon performed oRCR and CRCR, and the second surgeon performed ARCR. A cost analysis was designed to include a period of 60 days preoperatively, the index surgical hospitalization, and 90 days postoperatively, including costs of any readmission or reoperation.
The cohort consisted of 95 oRCR, 233 CRCR, and 287 ARCR. Median standardized costs were as follows: preoperative evaluation $486.03; index surgical hospitalization oRCR $9,343.10, CRCR $10,057.20, and ARCR $10,330.60; and postoperative care $875.02. Preoperative and postoperative costs did not vary based on the type of RCR performed. However, significant differences were observed among index surgical costs ( = .0008). The highest standardized cost for hospitalization for both the CRCR group and the ARCR group was related to the cost of the operating room and the implants. The 90-day complication, reoperation, and readmission rates were 1.1%, 1.1%, and 2.1% in the open group; 0.8%, 0.8%, and 1.7% in the combination group; 0%, 0%, and 1.7% in the all arthroscopic group, respectively. There were no significant differences among the 3 surgical procedures with respect to complication ( = .26), reoperation ( = .26), and readmission rates ( = .96).
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: In this investigation, the median standardized costs for RCR inclusive of 60-day workup and 90-day postoperative care were $10,704.15, $11,418.25, and $11,691.65 for oRCR, CRCR (average added cost $714.10), and ARCR (added cost $987.50), respectively. The group complication, reoperation, and readmission rate were 0.5%, 0.5%, and 1.8% with no significant differences between the varying techniques, respectively. This retrospective cost analysis and complication profile may serve as a useful reference as surgeons consider engaging in bundled payment for RCR. As value based initiatives continue to progress, implant cost may serve as an actionable area for cost reduction.
假设/背景:基于价值的医疗服务提供模式越来越普遍,并推动了成本效益计划。肩袖修复术(RCR)是一种常见的手术,具体手术技术存在一些差异。本研究的目的是在一家大型机构对三类RCR技术(开放手术[oRCR]、关节镜辅助与小切口联合手术[CRCR]以及全关节镜手术[ARCR])的成本、并发症和再入院率进行全面分析。
回顾性确定2012年至2017年期间在单一机构由两名接受过专科培训的肩部外科医生进行的所有RCR手术。这些手术包括oRCR、CRCR和ARCR修复技术。一名外科医生进行oRCR和CRCR手术,另一名外科医生进行ARCR手术。成本分析设计为包括术前60天、首次手术住院期间以及术后90天,包括任何再入院或再次手术的费用。
该队列包括95例oRCR、233例CRCR和287例ARCR。标准化成本中位数如下:术前评估486.03美元;首次手术住院费用oRCR为9343.10美元、CRCR为10057.20美元、ARCR为10330.60美元;术后护理875.02美元。术前和术后成本不因所进行的RCR类型而异。然而,首次手术成本之间存在显著差异(P = 0.0008)。CRCR组和ARCR组住院标准化成本最高与手术室和植入物成本有关。开放组90天并发症、再次手术和再入院率分别为1.1%、1.1%和2.1%;联合组为0.8%、0.8%和1.7%;全关节镜组分别为0%、0%和1.7%。三种手术在并发症(P = 0.26)、再次手术(P = 0.26)和再入院率(P = 0.96)方面无显著差异。
讨论/结论:在本研究中,包括60天检查和90天术后护理的RCR标准化成本中位数,oRCR为10704.15美元、CRCR为11418.25美元(平均增加成本714.10美元)、ARCR为11691.65美元(增加成本987.50美元)。各组并发症、再次手术和再入院率分别为0.5%、0.5%和1.8%,不同技术之间无显著差异。当外科医生考虑对RCR进行捆绑支付时,这种回顾性成本分析和并发症情况可能是一个有用的参考。随着基于价值的计划不断推进,植入物成本可能是一个可采取行动的成本降低领域。