• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭规模何时重要?英国的家庭子女数量、社会经济地位与教育

When does family size matter? Sibship size, socioeconomic status and education in England.

作者信息

Sheppard Paula, Monden Christiaan

机构信息

Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Oct 19;2:e51. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.54. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1017/ehs.2020.54
PMID:37588352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10427454/
Abstract

There is still no clear understanding of the relationship between sibship size and child outcomes. Research from across disciplines, and across settings, reports conflicting results suggesting that the relationship is complex and ecologically dependent. Evolutionary models predict that parents will make reproductive decisions based on their ability to invest in each child, but that this is not necessarily equal across children. Here we use data from the Next Steps study linked to National Pupil Database to examine the relationship between sibship size and Key Stage 4 (GCSE) maths and English grades in England for children born in 1989/1990. We were interested to further examine if and how associations might differ at the ends of the socioeconomic spectrum and we also tested if direct measures of parental investment could mitigate any negative impact of larger families. Multilevel ordinary least squares regression models with a random effect for school show that sibship sizes are associated with school grades, as is socioeconomic status. Moreover, the association between sibship size and grades holds true across the socioeconomic spectrum. Birth order was only weakly associated with school results, and only significant in some models. Parental investment is important, however, and might offset the some of the negative impact of larger families, for both maths and English attainment.

摘要

目前对于家庭子女数量与孩子成长结果之间的关系仍没有清晰的认识。来自不同学科和不同环境的研究报告结果相互矛盾,这表明这种关系很复杂且取决于生态因素。进化模型预测,父母会根据他们对每个孩子的投入能力来做出生育决策,但这种投入在每个孩子身上不一定是均等的。在此,我们使用与全国学生数据库相关联的“下一步”研究中的数据,来考察1989/1990年出生的英格兰儿童的家庭子女数量与关键阶段4(普通中等教育证书)数学和英语成绩之间的关系。我们有兴趣进一步研究在社会经济阶层两端这种关联是否存在差异以及如何存在差异,并且我们还测试了父母投入的直接衡量指标是否能够减轻大家庭带来的任何负面影响。具有学校随机效应的多层普通最小二乘回归模型表明,家庭子女数量与学校成绩相关,社会经济地位也是如此。此外,家庭子女数量与成绩之间的关联在整个社会经济阶层中都成立。出生顺序与学校成绩的关联较弱,且仅在某些模型中显著。然而,父母投入很重要,对于数学和英语成绩而言,它可能会抵消大家庭带来的一些负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2216/10427454/39dbc9f9e92e/S2513843X20000547_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2216/10427454/4f1129159e0a/S2513843X20000547_figAb.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2216/10427454/9d3af1a76cad/S2513843X20000547_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2216/10427454/dc4018f7c9f8/S2513843X20000547_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2216/10427454/17fa82bbb27f/S2513843X20000547_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2216/10427454/39dbc9f9e92e/S2513843X20000547_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2216/10427454/4f1129159e0a/S2513843X20000547_figAb.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2216/10427454/9d3af1a76cad/S2513843X20000547_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2216/10427454/dc4018f7c9f8/S2513843X20000547_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2216/10427454/17fa82bbb27f/S2513843X20000547_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2216/10427454/39dbc9f9e92e/S2513843X20000547_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
When does family size matter? Sibship size, socioeconomic status and education in England.家庭规模何时重要?英国的家庭子女数量、社会经济地位与教育
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Oct 19;2:e51. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.54. eCollection 2020.
2
Fewer Siblings, More Wealth? Sibship Size and Wealth Attainment.兄弟姐妹越少,财富越多?家庭规模与财富积累
Eur J Popul. 2019 Jan 17;35(5):959-986. doi: 10.1007/s10680-018-09512-x. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Sibship size and educational attainment in peninsular Malaysia: do policies matter?马来西亚半岛的家庭规模与教育成就:政策重要吗?
Sociol Perspect. 1997;40(2):227-42.
4
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
5
Birth order, sibship size, and status in modern Canada.现代加拿大的出生顺序、家庭规模和地位。
Hum Nat. 1997 Sep;8(3):205-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02912492.
6
Cohort Trends in the Association Between Sibship Size and Educational Attainment in 26 Low-Fertility Countries.队列研究:26 个低生育率国家中兄弟姐妹数量与教育程度的关联趋势
Demography. 2020 Jun;57(3):1035-1062. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00885-5.
7
Associations of adverse childhood experiences with educational attainment and adolescent health and the role of family and socioeconomic factors: A prospective cohort study in the UK.不良童年经历与受教育程度及青少年健康的关系,以及家庭和社会经济因素的作用:英国一项前瞻性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 2;17(3):e1003031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003031. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
The (Conditional) Resource Dilution Model: State- and Community-Level Modifications.(条件性)资源稀释模型:州级和社区层面的修正
Demography. 2016 Jun;53(3):723-48. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0471-0.
9
Birth order, sibship size, and risk for germ-cell testicular cancer.出生顺序、同胞数量与睾丸生殖细胞癌风险
Epidemiology. 2004 May;15(3):323-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000120043.45185.7e.
10
Birth order and sibship size as independent risk factors for asthma, allergy, and eczema.出生顺序和同胞数量作为哮喘、过敏和湿疹的独立风险因素。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2003 Dec;14(6):464-9. doi: 10.1046/j.0905-6157.2003.00108.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of child structure and means of eldercare on equitable distribution of family assets.儿童结构和赡养老人方式对家庭资产公平分配的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 14;19(11):e0312921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312921. eCollection 2024.
2
Sex-specific compensatory model of suicidal ideation: a population-based study (Urban HEART-2).基于人群的自杀意念特异性补偿模型研究(城市心脏研究-2)。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2120. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19586-4.

本文引用的文献

1
How Many Imputations Do You Need? A Two-stage Calculation Using a Quadratic Rule.你需要多少次插补?使用二次规则的两阶段计算。
Sociol Methods Res. 2020 Aug;49(3):699-718. doi: 10.1177/0049124117747303. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
2
Cohort Trends in the Association Between Sibship Size and Educational Attainment in 26 Low-Fertility Countries.队列研究:26 个低生育率国家中兄弟姐妹数量与教育程度的关联趋势
Demography. 2020 Jun;57(3):1035-1062. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00885-5.
3
Sharing the Load: How Do Coresident Children Influence the Allocation of Work and Schooling in Northwestern Tanzania?
分担负担:在坦桑尼亚西北部,共同居住的孩子如何影响工作和教育的分配?
Demography. 2019 Oct;56(5):1931-1956. doi: 10.1007/s13524-019-00818-x.
4
Education, Gender, and Cohort Fertility in the Nordic Countries.北欧国家的教育、性别与同期群生育率
Eur J Popul. 2018 Jun 19;35(3):563-586. doi: 10.1007/s10680-018-9492-2. eCollection 2019 Jul.
5
Family size and educational attainment in England and Wales.英国家庭规模和教育程度。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2019 Jul;73(2):165-178. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2019.1577479. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Sibship Size and Gendered Resource Dilution in Different Societal Contexts.不同社会背景下的同胞数量与性别化资源稀释
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 25;11(8):e0160953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160953. eCollection 2016.
7
The (Conditional) Resource Dilution Model: State- and Community-Level Modifications.(条件性)资源稀释模型:州级和社区层面的修正
Demography. 2016 Jun;53(3):723-48. doi: 10.1007/s13524-016-0471-0.
8
Wealth, fertility and adaptive behaviour in industrial populations.工业人口中的财富、生育能力与适应性行为。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Apr 19;371(1692):20150153. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0153.
9
Family policies in OECD countries: a comparative analysis.经合组织国家的家庭政策:比较分析。
Popul Dev Rev. 2011;37(1):57-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00390.x.
10
Parental investment and the optimization of human family size.父母投资与人类家庭规模的最优化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 12;366(1563):333-43. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0297.