• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

追求健身最大化的人在风险决策中采用悲观概率加权。

Fitness-maximizers employ pessimistic probability weighting for decisions under risk.

作者信息

Price Michael Holton, Jones James Holland

机构信息

Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, California, USA.

Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Jun 1;2:e28. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.28. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1017/ehs.2020.28
PMID:37588378
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10427448/
Abstract

The standard theory of rationality posits that agents order preferences according to average utilities associated with different choices. Expected utility theory has repeatedly failed as a predictive theory, as reflected in a growing literature in behavioural economics. Evolutionary theorists have suggested that seemingly irrational behaviours in contemporary contexts may have once served important functions, but existing work linking fitness and choice has not adequately addressed the challenges of constructing an evolutionary theory of decision making. In particular, fitness itself is not a reasonable metric for decision making since its timescale exceeds the lifespan of the decision-maker. Consequently, organisms use proximate systems that work on appropriate timescales and are amenable to feedback and learning. We develop an evolutionary principal-agent model in which individuals utilize a set of proximal choice variables to account for the non-linear dependence of these variables on consumption. While this is insufficient to maximize fitness in the presence of environmental stochasticity, maximum fitness can be achieved by adopting pessimistic probability weightings compatible with the rank-dependent expected utility family of choice models. In particular, pessimistic probability weighting emerges naturally in an evolutionary framework because of extreme intolerance to zeros in multiplicative growth processes.

摘要

标准理性理论假定,主体根据与不同选择相关的平均效用对偏好进行排序。预期效用理论作为一种预测理论屡屡失败,行为经济学中不断增多的文献对此有所反映。进化理论家认为,当代背景下看似不理性的行为可能曾经发挥过重要作用,但将适应性与选择联系起来的现有研究尚未充分应对构建进化决策理论的挑战。特别是,适应性本身并非决策的合理指标,因为其时间尺度超过了决策者的寿命。因此,生物体使用在适当时间尺度上起作用且易于反馈和学习的近端系统。我们构建了一个进化委托 - 代理模型,其中个体利用一组近端选择变量来解释这些变量对消费的非线性依赖。虽然在存在环境随机性的情况下这不足以使适应性最大化,但通过采用与等级依赖预期效用选择模型族兼容的悲观概率加权,可以实现最大适应性。特别是,由于在乘法增长过程中对零极端不容忍,悲观概率加权在进化框架中自然出现。

相似文献

1
Fitness-maximizers employ pessimistic probability weighting for decisions under risk.追求健身最大化的人在风险决策中采用悲观概率加权。
Evol Hum Sci. 2020 Jun 1;2:e28. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2020.28. eCollection 2020.
2
Inclusive fitness maximization: An axiomatic approach.广义适合度最大化:一种公理方法。
J Theor Biol. 2014 Jun 7;350:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
3
Stochastic representation decision theory: How probabilities and values are entangled dual characteristics in cognitive processes.随机表示决策理论:概率和价值如何在认知过程中纠缠为双重特征。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 14;15(12):e0243661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243661. eCollection 2020.
4
Deep Rationality: The Evolutionary Economics of Decision Making.深度理性:决策的演化经济学
Soc Cogn. 2009 Oct 1;27(5):764-785. doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.764.
5
Is expected utility theory normative for medical decision making?期望效用理论对医疗决策具有规范性吗?
Med Decis Making. 1996 Jan-Mar;16(1):1-6. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9601600101.
6
Many faces of rationality: Implications of the great rationality debate for clinical decision-making.理性的多面性:理性大辩论对临床决策的影响。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Oct;23(5):915-922. doi: 10.1111/jep.12788. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
7
Comparing utility functions between risky and riskless choice in rhesus monkeys.比较恒河猴风险选择和无风险选择下的效用函数。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Apr;25(2):385-399. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01560-x. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
8
The behavioural ecology of irrational behaviours.非理性行为的行为生态学
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2017 Aug 17;39(3):23. doi: 10.1007/s40656-017-0150-5.
9
Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.青少年决策中的风险与理性:对理论、实践和公共政策的启示。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Sep;7(1):1-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00026.x. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
10
A framework for estimating health state utility values within a discrete choice experiment: modeling risky choices.离散选择实验中估计健康状态效用值的框架:对风险选择进行建模
Med Decis Making. 2015 Apr;35(3):341-50. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14554715. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategic housing decisions and the evolution of urban settlements: optimality modelling and empirical application in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.战略性住房决策与城市住区的演变:蒙古国乌兰巴托的最优性建模与实证应用
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Oct 30;11(10):241415. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241415. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
An inferential spatiotemporal approach for knowledge synthesis to identify trends in public health research.一种用于知识合成以识别公共卫生研究趋势的推理时空方法。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 26;10(8):e28537. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28537. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
3
Understanding adaptability in the family environment in facing COVID-19: A review.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding Risky Behavior: The Influence of Cognitive, Emotional and Hormonal Factors on Decision-Making under Risk.理解危险行为:认知、情感和激素因素对风险决策的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 1;8:102. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00102. eCollection 2017.
2
Evaluating gambles using dynamics.使用动力学评估赌博。
Chaos. 2016 Feb;26(2):023103. doi: 10.1063/1.4940236.
3
The evolutionary roots of human decision making.人类决策的进化根源。
了解家庭环境在应对新冠肺炎疫情时的适应性:一项综述
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 27;9(11):e20618. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20618. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Acculturation and market integration are associated with greater trust among Tanzanian Maasai pastoralists.文化适应和市场整合与坦桑尼亚马赛牧民之间更高的信任度相关。
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Feb 10;3:e15. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.10. eCollection 2021.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:321-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015310.
4
The marginal valuation of fertility.生育的边际估值。
Evol Hum Behav. 2014 Jan 1;35(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.10.002.
5
Cortisol shifts financial risk preferences.皮质醇改变财务风险偏好。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 4;111(9):3608-13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317908111. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
6
To kill a kangaroo: understanding the decision to pursue high-risk/high-gain resources.欲杀袋鼠:理解追求高风险/高收益资源的决策。
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jul 24;280(1767):20131210. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1210. Print 2013 Sep 22.
7
An experimental study of the auction-value of an uncertain outcome.关于不确定结果拍卖价值的实验研究
Am J Psychol. 1948 Apr;61(2):183-93.
8
Decision-making in the presence of risk.风险存在时的决策。
Science. 1987 May 1;236(4801):537-43. doi: 10.1126/science.236.4801.537.
9
The paranoid optimist: an integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases.偏执的乐观主义者:认知偏差的综合进化模型
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2006;10(1):47-66. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_3.
10
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.关于判断与选择的一种视角:描绘有限理性
Am Psychol. 2003 Sep;58(9):697-720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697.