Kenrick Douglas T, Griskevicius Vladas, Sundie Jill M, Li Norman P, Li Yexin Jessica, Neuberg Steven L
Arizona State University.
Soc Cogn. 2009 Oct 1;27(5):764-785. doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.764.
What is a "rational" decision? Economists traditionally viewed rationality as maximizing expected satisfaction. This view has been useful in modeling basic microeconomic concepts, but falls short in accounting for many everyday human decisions. It leaves unanswered why some things reliably make people more satisfied than others, and why people frequently act to make others happy at a cost to themselves. Drawing on an evolutionary perspective, we propose that people make decisions according to a set of principles that may not appear to make sense at the superficial level, but that demonstrate rationality at a deeper evolutionary level. By this, we mean that people use adaptive domain-specific decision-rules that, on average, would have resulted in fitness benefits. Using this framework, we re-examine several economic principles. We suggest that traditional psychological functions governing risk aversion, discounting of future benefits, and budget allocations to multiple goods, for example, vary in predictable ways as a function of the underlying motive of the decision-maker and individual differences linked to evolved life-history strategies. A deep rationality framework not only helps explain why people make the decisions they do, but also inspires multiple directions for future research.
什么是“理性”决策?传统上,经济学家将理性视为期望满意度最大化。这种观点在构建基本微观经济概念模型方面很有用,但在解释许多日常人类决策时却存在不足。它没有回答为什么有些事情能可靠地让人们比其他事情更满意,以及为什么人们经常会以自我牺牲为代价去让他人开心。从进化的角度来看,我们认为人们依据一系列原则来做决策,这些原则在表面层面可能看似不合理,但在更深层次的进化层面却展现出理性。我们的意思是,人们使用适应性的特定领域决策规则,平均而言,这些规则会带来适应性益处。运用这个框架,我们重新审视了几个经济学原理。例如,我们认为,传统上支配风险规避、对未来收益的贴现以及对多种商品的预算分配的心理功能,会根据决策者的潜在动机以及与进化而来的生活史策略相关的个体差异,以可预测的方式发生变化。一个深度理性框架不仅有助于解释人们为何做出他们所做的决策,还为未来研究激发了多个方向。