• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

图像表现的风格是由群体间的接触塑造的。

Style of pictorial representation is shaped by intergroup contact.

作者信息

Granito Carmen, Tehrani Jamie, Kendal Jeremy, Scott-Phillips Thom

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham DH13LE, UK.

Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, Budapest 1051, Hungary.

出版信息

Evol Hum Sci. 2019 Jul 23;1:e8. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.8. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1017/ehs.2019.8
PMID:37588408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10427304/
Abstract

Pictorial representation is a key human behaviour. Cultures around the world have made images to convey information about living kinds, objects and ideas for at least 75,000 years, in forms as diverse as cave paintings, religious icons and emojis. However, styles of pictorial representation vary greatly between cultures and historical periods. In particular, they can differ in figurativeness, i.e. varying from detailed depictions of subjects to stylised abstract forms. Here we show that pictorial styles can be shaped by intergroup contact. We use data from experimental microsocieties to show that drawings produced by groups in contact tended to become more figurative and transparent to outsiders, whereas in isolated groups drawings tended to become abstract and opaque. These results indicate that intergroup contact is likely to be an important factor in the cultural evolution of pictorial representation, because the need to communicate with outsiders ensures that some figurativeness is retained over time. We discuss the implications of this finding for understanding the history and anthropology of art, and the parallels with sociolinguistics and language evolution.

摘要

图像表现是一种关键的人类行为。至少在75000年的时间里,世界各地的文化都通过图像来传达有关生物、物体和思想的信息,其形式多种多样,包括洞穴壁画、宗教图标和表情符号。然而,图像表现的风格在不同文化和历史时期之间差异很大。特别是,它们在具象性方面可能有所不同,即从对主题的详细描绘到风格化的抽象形式。在这里,我们表明图像风格可以受到群体间接触的影响。我们使用来自实验性微观社会的数据表明,有接触的群体所绘制的图画往往对外人来说变得更具具象性和易懂性,而在孤立的群体中,图画往往变得抽象且难懂。这些结果表明,群体间接触很可能是图像表现文化演变中的一个重要因素,因为与外人交流的需要确保了随着时间的推移一些具象性得以保留。我们讨论了这一发现对于理解艺术史和人类学的意义,以及与社会语言学和语言演变的相似之处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b361/10427304/5b64f6b73e48/S2513843X19000082_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b361/10427304/ff8b9755a3e6/S2513843X19000082_figAb.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b361/10427304/3acbefa84a26/S2513843X19000082_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b361/10427304/cd21bb6c7ccb/S2513843X19000082_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b361/10427304/3f819a6613cb/S2513843X19000082_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b361/10427304/5b64f6b73e48/S2513843X19000082_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b361/10427304/ff8b9755a3e6/S2513843X19000082_figAb.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b361/10427304/3acbefa84a26/S2513843X19000082_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b361/10427304/cd21bb6c7ccb/S2513843X19000082_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b361/10427304/3f819a6613cb/S2513843X19000082_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b361/10427304/5b64f6b73e48/S2513843X19000082_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Style of pictorial representation is shaped by intergroup contact.图像表现的风格是由群体间的接触塑造的。
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 Jul 23;1:e8. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.8. eCollection 2019.
2
Does Group Contact Shape Styles of Pictorial Representation? A Case Study of Australian Rock Art.群组接触是否影响绘画风格?以澳大利亚岩画为例。
Hum Nat. 2022 Sep;33(3):237-260. doi: 10.1007/s12110-022-09430-2. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
3
Eye contricks.眼部戏法。 (不过“Eye contricks”表述不太准确规范,可能原文有误,正常应该是“Eye tricks”之类的)
Iperception. 2011;2(5):486-501. doi: 10.1068/i0442aap. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
4
Earliest hunting scene in prehistoric art.史前艺术中最早的狩猎场景。
Nature. 2019 Dec;576(7787):442-445. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1806-y. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
5
Visual resemblance and interaction history jointly constrain pictorial meaning.视觉相似性和交互历史共同约束图像意义。
Nat Commun. 2023 Apr 17;14(1):2199. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37737-w.
6
EmojiGrid: A 2D pictorial scale for cross-cultural emotion assessment of negatively and positively valenced food.EmojiGrid:一种用于评估负面和正面情绪食物的跨文化情感的二维图像量表。
Food Res Int. 2019 Jan;115:541-551. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.049. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
7
The Spatiotemporal Neural Dynamics of Object Recognition for Natural Images and Line Drawings.自然图像和线条图的对象识别的时空神经动力学。
J Neurosci. 2023 Jan 18;43(3):484-500. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1546-22.2022. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
8
Aristotle's dream: Evolutionary and neural aspects of aesthetic communication in the arts.亚里士多德的梦想:艺术审美交流的进化和神经基础。
Psych J. 2021 Apr;10(2):224-243. doi: 10.1002/pchj.416. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
9
In tribute to Luigi Castagnetta-drawings. A narrative approach for children with cancer.献给路易吉·卡斯塔涅塔的画作。一种针对癌症患儿的叙事方法。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Nov;1089:xvi-xxiii. doi: 10.1196/annals.1386.020.
10
[The influence of music on pictorial expression of young women--a comparative study of different music styles].[音乐对年轻女性绘画表达的影响——不同音乐风格的比较研究]
Bull Soc Sci Med Grand Duche Luxemb. 2010;Spec No 1(1):167-79.

引用本文的文献

1
Entropy trade-offs in artistic design: A case study of Tamil .艺术设计中的熵权衡:以泰米尔语为例的案例研究
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Mar 1;3:e23. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.14. eCollection 2021.
2
Does Group Contact Shape Styles of Pictorial Representation? A Case Study of Australian Rock Art.群组接触是否影响绘画风格?以澳大利亚岩画为例。
Hum Nat. 2022 Sep;33(3):237-260. doi: 10.1007/s12110-022-09430-2. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
3
Limited Scope for Group Coordination in Stylistic Variations of Art.艺术文体变体中群体协调的范围有限。

本文引用的文献

1
The evolution of early symbolic behavior in .早期符号行为的进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 3;117(9):4578-4584. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910880117. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
2
Neuroimaging supports the representational nature of the earliest human engravings.神经影像学研究为早期人类雕刻的具象性质提供了支持。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jul 3;6(7):190086. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190086. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
An abstract drawing from the 73,000-year-old levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa.南非布隆伯斯洞 7.3 万年前地层的抽象绘画。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 28;12:742577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742577. eCollection 2021.
4
Language structure is influenced by the number of speakers but seemingly not by the proportion of non-native speakers.语言结构受使用者数量的影响,但似乎不受非母语使用者比例的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Feb 27;6(2):181274. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181274. eCollection 2019 Feb.
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7725):115-118. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0514-3. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
Simpler grammar, larger vocabulary: How population size affects language.语法更简单,词汇量更大:人口规模如何影响语言。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jan 31;285(1871). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2586.
5
Culture: copying, compression, and conventionality.文化:复制、压缩与传统性。
Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;39(1):171-83. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12144. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
6
Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas.四万常见英语单词词素的具体性等级评定。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):904-11. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5.
7
The cultural evolution of human communication systems in different sized populations: usability trumps learnability.不同规模人群中人类交流系统的文化进化:可用性优于可学习性。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 15;8(8):e71781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071781. eCollection 2013.
8
Audience design through social interaction during group discussion.通过小组讨论中的社会互动进行受众设计。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057211. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
9
Cultural evolution and perpetuation of arbitrary communicative conventions in experimental microsocieties.实验微社会中任意交际惯例的文化进化和延续。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043807. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
10
Foundations of representation: where might graphical symbol systems come from?表示法基础:图形符号系统可能来自何处?
Cogn Sci. 2007 Nov 12;31(6):961-87. doi: 10.1080/03640210701703659.