• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骶髂关节融合趋势的全国性分析:利用情况和人口特征的区域差异

Nationwide Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Trends: Regional Variations in Utilization and Population Characteristics.

作者信息

Ton Andy, Mertz Kevin, Abdou Marc, Hang Nicole, Mills Emily S, Hah Raymond J, Alluri Ram K, Wang Jeffrey C

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine at The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):518-525. doi: 10.1177/21925682231196448. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1177/21925682231196448
PMID:37590334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11877661/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates utilization and demographic trends for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusions across the United States (US).

METHODS

Patients who underwent SIJ fusion from 2010-2021 were identified within the PearlDiver national database using International Classification of Disease (ICD-9, ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Indications for trauma, malignancy, or infection were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and procedure characteristics were recorded along with annual utilization rates. Annual percent change (APC) was calculated to identify increasing or decreasing utilization from prior years. Negative binomial regression was performed to project subsequent utilization for 2022-2028. Chi-squared analysis followed by post-hoc comparisons were used to compare differences in diagnostic indications and clinical features associated with SIJ fusion across regions. Bonferroni adjustments were applied to -values for pairwise analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 18 032 patients (69.8% female, mean age = 51.0 13.4 years) underwent SIJ fusion between 2010 and 2021. Annual utilization increased by 33.5% on average. The South comprised the largest proportion of cases (48.9%). Projections for 2022-2028 predict continued growth in procedures, with an overall increase of 1100% from 1350 cases in 2021 to 16 195 by end of 2028. Spondyloarthropathy-induced sacroilitis was the most prevalent diagnostic indication nationwide (51%). Of patients undergoing SIJ fusion, 18% had a prior lumbar fusion, and only 45% received a preoperative diagnostic SIJ injection.

CONCLUSION

As SIJ fusion is increasingly utilized to treat refractory SIJ-based pain, establishing evidence-based guidelines, improving diagnostic strategies, and defining indications are imperative to support growing applications within clinical practice.

摘要

研究设计/设置:回顾性队列分析。

目的

本研究评估美国骶髂关节(SIJ)融合术的使用情况和人口统计学趋势。

方法

利用珍珠潜水员国家数据库,通过国际疾病分类(ICD - 9、ICD - 10)和当前手术操作术语(CPT)编码,识别出2010年至2021年间接受SIJ融合术的患者。排除创伤、恶性肿瘤或感染的指征。记录人口统计学、临床和手术特征以及年使用率。计算年度百分比变化(APC)以确定与前几年相比使用率的增加或减少。进行负二项式回归以预测2022年至2028年的后续使用率。采用卡方分析及事后比较来比较各地区与SIJ融合相关的诊断指征和临床特征的差异。对两两分析的P值应用邦费罗尼校正。

结果

总体而言,2010年至2021年间有18032例患者(69.8%为女性,平均年龄 = 51.0 ± 13.4岁)接受了SIJ融合术。年使用率平均增长了33.5%。南方的病例占比最大(48.9%)。2022年至2028年的预测表明手术量将持续增长,从2021年的1350例总体增加1100%,到2028年底达到16195例。脊柱关节病引起的骶髂关节炎是全国最常见的诊断指征(51%)。接受SIJ融合术的患者中,18%曾接受过腰椎融合术,只有45%在术前接受了诊断性SIJ注射。

结论

由于SIJ融合术越来越多地用于治疗基于SIJ的难治性疼痛,制定循证指南、改进诊断策略并明确指征对于支持其在临床实践中的不断应用至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd4/11877661/d280e6a7e540/10.1177_21925682231196448-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd4/11877661/e0ca8a66091a/10.1177_21925682231196448-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd4/11877661/2de91d3cf35d/10.1177_21925682231196448-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd4/11877661/63b43aaa00ec/10.1177_21925682231196448-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd4/11877661/d280e6a7e540/10.1177_21925682231196448-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd4/11877661/e0ca8a66091a/10.1177_21925682231196448-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd4/11877661/2de91d3cf35d/10.1177_21925682231196448-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd4/11877661/63b43aaa00ec/10.1177_21925682231196448-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5cd4/11877661/d280e6a7e540/10.1177_21925682231196448-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Nationwide Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Trends: Regional Variations in Utilization and Population Characteristics.骶髂关节融合趋势的全国性分析:利用情况和人口特征的区域差异
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):518-525. doi: 10.1177/21925682231196448. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
2
Medicare Reimbursement Rates and Utilization Trends in Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.骶髂关节融合术的医疗保险报销率和使用趋势。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Sep 1;31(17):923-930. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00800. Epub 2023 May 15.
3
A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis of the Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Device.一种新型骶髂关节后路融合装置长期疗效与安全性的多中心回顾性分析
J Pain Res. 2021 Oct 14;14:3251-3258. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S326827. eCollection 2021.
4
Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint.骶髂关节稳定术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(2 Suppl):Editorial. doi: 10.3171/2013.V2.FOCUS13273.
5
Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.三叶状钛植入物用于骶髂关节融合。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Apr;28(4):727-734. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5860-1. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
6
Triangular Titanium Implants for Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: 2-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Multicenter Trial.用于微创骶髂关节融合的三角形钛植入物:一项前瞻性多中心试验的2年随访
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Apr 20;10:13. doi: 10.14444/3013. eCollection 2016.
7
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using the Silo TFX™ Transfixing Bridge Titanium Device: Two Case Reports from the United States.使用Silo TFX™ 经固定桥接钛装置进行骶髂关节融合术:来自美国的两例病例报告
Pain Med Case Rep. 2025 Apr;9(2):97-101.
8
Propensity-matched Analysis of 1062 Patients Following Minimally Invasive Versus Open Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.1062 例微创与开放骶髂关节融合术后患者的倾向性匹配分析。
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Oct 1;34(8):E477-E482. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001244.
9
Robotic versus nonrobotic sacroiliac joint fusion.机器人辅助与非机器人辅助骶髂关节融合术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jul;55(1):E4. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.FOCUS23146.
10
Impact of diagnosis and type of sacroiliac joint fusion on postoperative complications.骶髂关节融合术的诊断及类型对术后并发症的影响
Eur Spine J. 2022 Mar;31(3):710-717. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07031-8. Epub 2021 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Increased Risk of Lumbar Fusion Following Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis.腰椎退行性疾病患者骶髂关节融合术后腰椎融合风险增加:一项全国性队列分析。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jul 14:21925682251358728. doi: 10.1177/21925682251358728.
2
Sacroiliac joint fusion: incidence, timing, and risk factors for contralateral fusion.骶髂关节融合:对侧融合的发生率、时机及危险因素。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Apr 30;22:100614. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100614. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
The global epidemic of low back pain.全球腰痛流行情况。
Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 Jun;5(6):e305. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00133-9.
2
Chronic low back pain and its impact on physical function, mental health, and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study in Singapore.慢性下背痛及其对身体功能、心理健康和健康相关生活质量的影响:新加坡的一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 21;12(1):20040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24703-7.
3
Commercial Claims Data Sources: PearlDiver and Individual Payer Databases.商业索赔数据源:PearlDiver和个体支付者数据库。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Oct 19;104(Suppl 3):15-17. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00607.
4
Cost-Utility Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Multi-Level Lumbar Fusion to the Sacrum.对接受多节段腰椎至骶骨融合术的高危患者进行骶髂关节融合术的成本效用分析。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Aug 8;14:523-535. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S377132. eCollection 2022.
5
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs Conservative Management in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.骶髂关节功能障碍患者的微创骶髂关节融合术与保守治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Jun;16(3):472-480. doi: 10.14444/8241.
6
Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.微创骶髂关节融合术治疗慢性骶髂关节痛:系统评价。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1240-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
Impact of diagnosis and type of sacroiliac joint fusion on postoperative complications.骶髂关节融合术的诊断及类型对术后并发症的影响
Eur Spine J. 2022 Mar;31(3):710-717. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07031-8. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
8
Successful Diagnosis of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.骶髂关节功能障碍的成功诊断
J Pain Res. 2021 Oct 8;14:3135-3143. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S327351. eCollection 2021.
9
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment.骶髂关节功能紊乱:病理生理学、诊断与治疗。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Oct;30(10):2936-2943. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06927-9. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
10
A Nation-Wide Review of Elective Surgery and COVID-Surge Capacity.全国范围内的择期手术和 COVID-19 激增能力回顾。
J Surg Res. 2021 Nov;267:211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.05.028. Epub 2021 Jun 19.