Sipiczki M
Department of Genetics and Applied Microbiology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2023 Dec 2;406:110360. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110360. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
Plant pathogenic and food spoilage microorganisms cause serious losses in crop production and severe damage during food manufacturing, transportation and storage. Synthetic antimicrobial agents are commonly used to control their propagation and harmful activities. However, the recent trend is shifting from chemicals towards safer and more eco-friendly alternatives. The use of antagonistic microorganisms as biological antimicrobial agents is becoming popular throughout the world to replace chemical agents. High numbers of microorganisms have turned out to exert adverse/inhibitory effects on other microorganisms including pathogens and spoiling strains. However, most of them are only active under laboratory conditions and their activity is sensitive to environmental changes. Only a small number of them can be used to manufacture biological protective products on an industrial scale. Therefore, there is a great need to identify additional antagonists. Yeasts have come to the forefront of attention because antimicrobial antagonism is fairly widespread among them. In the recent years, numerous excellent review articles covered various aspects of the phenomenon of antimicrobial antagonism of yeasts. However, none of them dealt with how antagonistic yeasts can be sought and identified, despite the high number and diverse efficiency of screening and identification procedures. As researchers working in different laboratories use different criteria and different experimental set-ups, a yeast strain found antagonistic in one laboratory may prove to be non-antagonistic in another laboratory. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and partially critical overview of the wide diversity of identification criteria and procedures to help researchers choose appropriate screening and identification strategies.
植物病原微生物和食品腐败微生物在作物生产中造成严重损失,并在食品制造、运输和储存过程中造成严重破坏。合成抗菌剂通常用于控制它们的繁殖和有害活动。然而,最近的趋势是从化学物质转向更安全、更环保的替代品。使用拮抗微生物作为生物抗菌剂在全世界正变得越来越流行,以取代化学药剂。大量微生物已被证明对包括病原体和腐败菌株在内的其他微生物产生不利/抑制作用。然而,它们中的大多数仅在实验室条件下具有活性,并且其活性对环境变化敏感。只有少数几种可用于工业规模生产生物防护产品。因此,迫切需要鉴定更多的拮抗剂。酵母已成为关注的焦点,因为抗菌拮抗作用在它们当中相当普遍。近年来,众多优秀的综述文章涵盖了酵母抗菌拮抗现象的各个方面。然而,尽管筛选和鉴定程序数量众多且效率多样,但它们都没有涉及如何寻找和鉴定拮抗酵母。由于不同实验室的研究人员使用不同的标准和不同的实验设置,在一个实验室中发现具有拮抗作用的酵母菌株在另一个实验室中可能被证明没有拮抗作用。本综述旨在对广泛多样的鉴定标准和程序进行全面且部分批判性的概述,以帮助研究人员选择合适的筛选和鉴定策略。