Fleischmann Carolin, Henking Tanja, Neuderth Silke
Institut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften, Technische Hochschule Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Münzstr. 12, 97070, Würzburg, Deutschland.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Oct;66(10):1172-1182. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03751-y. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
Advance directives (ADs) such as living wills or healthcare powers of attorney are important tools to anticipate medical treatment decisions when decision-making capacity is lost in the future. Although a rising number of citizens in Germany are creating such documents, little is known about their knowledge of the purpose, types, and use of ADs. After more than 10 years since legislation on ADs came into force, this study intends to measure the objective knowledge of citizens and detect deficits in knowledge.
We conducted a cross-sectional quantitative survey of citizens aged 18+ in the city and county of Wuerzburg. The questionnaire included, among other things, possession, experience, and knowledge of ADs. Sampling was conducted via advertising and local networking.
Of the 282 participants who took part in the survey (M = 50 years, 2/3 female), 43.4% reported having created a minimum of one document. In the knowledge test, an average of 22/34 points was achieved. While questions about the specific application of ADs based on a case study were often answered correctly, we found deficits about the single document types. The results in the knowledge test and the variables on the subjective level of knowledge correlate positively.
The relatively high rate of ADs in this sample indicates their rapid dissemination during the past few years in Germany. Overall, the level of knowledge ADs appears to be low, revealing misconceptions about the creator's and involved people's rights and obligations. The measured knowledge level contradicts with the frequently expressed desire of citizens to preserve their autonomy by creating ADs for themselves.
生前遗嘱或医疗保健授权书等预立医疗指示是在未来丧失决策能力时预判医疗决策的重要工具。尽管德国越来越多的公民在创建此类文件,但对于他们对预立医疗指示的目的、类型和用途的了解却知之甚少。自预立医疗指示立法生效十多年后,本研究旨在衡量公民的客观知识水平并发现知识缺陷。
我们对维尔茨堡市县18岁及以上的公民进行了一项横断面定量调查。问卷内容除其他外,还包括预立医疗指示的持有情况、经验和知识。抽样通过广告和当地人脉进行。
在参与调查的282名参与者中(平均年龄M = 50岁,三分之二为女性),43.4%的人报告至少创建了一份文件。在知识测试中,平均得分为22/34分。虽然基于案例研究的关于预立医疗指示具体应用的问题经常被正确回答,但我们发现对单一文件类型存在知识缺陷。知识测试结果与主观知识水平变量呈正相关。
该样本中相对较高的预立医疗指示比例表明其在过去几年中在德国迅速传播。总体而言,预立医疗指示的知识水平似乎较低,这揭示了对创建者以及相关人员的权利和义务存在误解看法。所测得的知识水平与公民频繁表达的通过为自己创建预立医疗指示来维护其自主权的愿望相矛盾。