• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者中SGLT2抑制剂与新发急性冠状动脉综合征的关联:一项基于人群的纵向队列研究。

The association between SGLT2 inhibitors and new-onset acute coronary syndrome in the elderly: a population-based longitudinal cohort study.

作者信息

Lin Tsung-Kun, Lee Mei-Chun, Cheng Yu-Han, Ma Timothy, Chen Mei-Chun, Yang Tsung-Yuan, Jong Gwo-Ping

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC.

School of Pharmacy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

出版信息

Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Aug 17;15(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01143-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13098-023-01143-5
PMID:37592322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10433571/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several observational cohorts and meta-analytical studies on humans have shown that users of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have a lower risk for new-onset acute coronary syndrome (ACS) than nonusers. However, some studies, including randomized clinical trials, reported the opposite results. This study aimed to investigate the impacts of a SGLT2i on new-onset ACS in a population.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study involving 56,356 subjects who received SGLT2i therapy and 112,712 patients who did not receive SGLT2i therapy between May 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019. The outcome was the risk of new-onset ACS. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for associations between SGLT2i use and ACS risk.

RESULTS

A total of 670 and 1408 ACS events occurred in SGLT2i users and nonusers, respectively, during a follow-up of 3.7 years. SGLT2i use was associated with a nonsignificantly lower risk of ACS (adjusted HR 0.95, 95%confidence intervals (CI 0.87-1.04, P = 0.3218). We confirmed the robustness of these results through a propensity score 1:1 matching analysis. The results of the subgroup analysis of the subtype of the SGLT2i treatments were consistent with the main findings. An increased risk for the incidence of ACS in male and older (> 70 years) patients were also found.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based cohort study, we found that SGLT2i use is associated with a nonsignificantly decreased risk of ACS. No difference in the SGLT2i subtype was observed in subgroup analyses. However, the results of this study indicated an increased risk for the incidence of ACS in male and older (> 70 years) patients.

摘要

背景

多项针对人类的观察性队列研究和荟萃分析表明,与未使用者相比,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)使用者新发急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的风险更低。然而,包括随机临床试验在内的一些研究却报告了相反的结果。本研究旨在调查SGLT2i对人群中新发ACS的影响。

方法

我们进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,纳入了2016年5月1日至2019年12月31日期间接受SGLT2i治疗的56356名受试者和未接受SGLT2i治疗的112712名患者。观察的结果是新发ACS的风险。采用多变量Cox比例风险模型计算SGLT2i使用与ACS风险之间关联的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间。

结果

在3.7年的随访期间,SGLT2i使用者和非使用者分别发生了670例和1408例ACS事件。使用SGLT2i与ACS风险非显著降低相关(校正HR为0.95,95%置信区间为0.87 - 1.04,P = 0.3218)。我们通过倾向评分1:1匹配分析证实了这些结果的稳健性。SGLT2i治疗亚型的亚组分析结果与主要发现一致。还发现男性和年龄较大(>70岁)患者发生ACS的风险增加。

结论

在这项基于人群的队列研究中,我们发现使用SGLT2i与ACS风险非显著降低相关。亚组分析未观察到SGLT2i亚型之间存在差异。然而,本研究结果表明男性和年龄较大(>70岁)患者发生ACS的风险增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b02c/10433571/fe64a6a5ec10/13098_2023_1143_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b02c/10433571/e26077264d4f/13098_2023_1143_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b02c/10433571/fe64a6a5ec10/13098_2023_1143_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b02c/10433571/e26077264d4f/13098_2023_1143_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b02c/10433571/fe64a6a5ec10/13098_2023_1143_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The association between SGLT2 inhibitors and new-onset acute coronary syndrome in the elderly: a population-based longitudinal cohort study.老年患者中SGLT2抑制剂与新发急性冠状动脉综合征的关联:一项基于人群的纵向队列研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Aug 17;15(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01143-5.
2
Comparison of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor on the Risks of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke and Mortality in Diabetic Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Study in Hong Kong.比较钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂对香港糖尿病患者新发心房颤动、卒中和死亡率风险的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Jun;37(3):561-569. doi: 10.1007/s10557-022-07319-x. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
3
Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor vs Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Use With Risk of Incident Obstructive Airway Disease and Exacerbation Events Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Hong Kong.在中国香港,钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂的使用与 2 型糖尿病患者发生阻塞性气道疾病和加重事件的风险相关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2251177. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.51177.
4
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Stabilize Coronary Plaques in Acute Coronary Syndrome With Diabetes Mellitus.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂稳定糖尿病合并急性冠状动脉综合征患者的冠状动脉斑块。
Am J Cardiol. 2024 Mar 1;214:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.12.056. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
5
Cardiovascular Outcomes and Risks After Initiation of a Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor: Results From the EASEL Population-Based Cohort Study (Evidence for Cardiovascular Outcomes With Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in the Real World).钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂起始治疗后的心血管结局和风险:来自 EASEL 基于人群的队列研究的结果(真实世界中钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂的心血管结局证据)。
Circulation. 2018 Apr 3;137(14):1450-1459. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031227. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Incident heart failure and myocardial infarction in sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 vs. dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor users.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂使用者中的心力衰竭和心肌梗死事件。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Apr;9(2):1388-1399. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13830. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
7
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor use in early-phase acute coronary syndrome with severe heart failure.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在伴有严重心力衰竭的早期急性冠状动脉综合征中的应用。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2023 Jul 29;9(5):444-452. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvad035.
8
Lower risk of gout in sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors in type-2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者中,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂相比二肽基肽酶-4(DPP4)抑制剂,痛风风险更低。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Apr 3;62(4):1501-1510. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac509.
9
Comparing sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on new-onset depression: a propensity score-matched study in Hong Kong.比较钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂对新发抑郁症的影响:香港一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Acta Diabetol. 2023 Jul;60(7):917-927. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02063-6. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
10
Association of adverse respiratory events with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors among patients with type 2 diabetes in South Korea: a nationwide cohort study.在韩国,2 型糖尿病患者中钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶 4 抑制剂相关的不良呼吸事件的关联:一项全国性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2023 Feb 10;21(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02765-2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Reasons for the Low Uptake of New Antidiabetic Drugs with Cardiovascular Effects-A Family Doctor Perspective.具有心血管效应的新型抗糖尿病药物使用率低的原因——家庭医生视角
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 12;13(6):1617. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061617.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Type 2 Diabetes in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Current State and Future Perspectives.急性冠状动脉综合征中2型糖尿病的管理:现状与未来展望
Curr Pharm Des. 2023;29(5):365-367. doi: 10.2174/1381612829666230210161306.
2
Influence of the Door-to-ECG Time on the Prognosis of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.门到心电图时间对急性冠状动脉综合征患者预后的影响。
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 Jan;39(1):127-134. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202301_39(1).20220602B.
3
Efficacy and safety profile of SGLT2 inhibitors in the elderly: How is the benefit/risk balance?
钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂在老年人中的疗效与安全性概况:获益/风险平衡情况如何?
Diabetes Metab. 2023 Mar;49(2):101419. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2023.101419. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
4
Sex Differences in Characteristics, Outcomes, and Treatment Response With Dapagliflozin Across the Range of Ejection Fraction in Patients With Heart Failure: Insights From DAPA-HF and DELIVER.达格列净在射血分数范围心力衰竭患者中的特征、结局和治疗反应的性别差异:来自 DAPA-HF 和 DELIVER 的见解。
Circulation. 2023 Feb 21;147(8):624-634. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062832. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
5
Estimated Long-Term Benefit of Dapagliflozin in Patients With Heart Failure.达格列净治疗心力衰竭患者的长期获益估计。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Nov 8;80(19):1775-1784. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.745. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
6
Differential cardiovascular and renal benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.SGLT2 抑制剂和 GLP1 受体激动剂在 2 型糖尿病患者中的心血管和肾脏获益差异。
Int J Cardiol. 2022 Oct 1;364:104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.027. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
7
Comparison of cardiovascular outcomes between SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetes mellitus.比较 SGLT2 抑制剂在糖尿病患者中的心血管结局。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 May 18;21(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01508-6.
8
Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitor Use With Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With Stabilized Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity Score Matching Study.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂的使用与急性心肌梗死病情稳定的2型糖尿病患者心血管和肾脏结局的关联:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 29;9:882181. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.882181. eCollection 2022.
9
Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2021: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.《临床心脏病学进展 2021:关键临床试验综述》。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jun;39(6):2398-2437. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02136-y. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
10
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors Mechanisms of Action: A Review.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂的作用机制:综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 20;8:777861. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.777861. eCollection 2021.