Lagdon Susan, Klencakova Lucia, Schubotz Dirk, Shannon Ciaran, Tully Mark A, Armour Cherie, Jordan Julie-Ann
School of Psychology, Ulster University, Northern Ireland, UK.
School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2023 Jan 12;16(3):537-545. doi: 10.1007/s40653-022-00508-8. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Coercive control and related research have progressed significantly in the past number of years, with an ever-growing evidence base adding to its construct. However, currently there is a lack of evidence on young people's knowledge and understanding of coercive control. We included a module of questions in the 2020 Northern Ireland Young Life and Life and Times survey ( = 2,069) with the aim of capturing baseline measurable data on understanding of coercive control within intimate relationships among 16-year olds. Only 16% ( = 325) of respondents had heard of the term coercive control and knew what it meant. Findings also revealed that females, compared to males, were less likely to have heard of coercive control. When the victim being subjected to the behaviours was portrayed as female as opposed to male there was stronger recognition of the associated risks, need for support, and the seriousness of the situation. Our study findings call to question young people's knowledge of unhealthy intimate relationship behaviours beyond blatant and deliberate acts of harm such as those described in the coercive control scenarios. Gender disparities in awareness of coercive control across the study sample also give cause for concern given the increased risk of intimate partner violence among women and girls as well as lower reporting and help seeking among male victims. Results solidify the necessity for dedicated preventative and intervention efforts which focus on intimate relationships and reflect the diverse needs and experiences of young people. Supporting young people to act on their own behalf is an important step change to empowerment within their own intimate relationships.
在过去几年中,强制性控制及相关研究取得了显著进展,越来越多的证据充实了这一概念。然而,目前缺乏关于年轻人对强制性控制的认识和理解的证据。我们在2020年北爱尔兰青年生活与生活时代调查(n = 2069)中纳入了一个问题模块,旨在获取关于16岁青少年对亲密关系中强制性控制理解的基线可测量数据。只有16%(n = 325)的受访者听说过“强制性控制”这个术语并知道其含义。研究结果还显示,与男性相比,女性听说过强制性控制的可能性更小。当遭受这些行为的受害者被描述为女性而非男性时,人们对相关风险、支持需求以及情况的严重性有更强的认识。我们的研究结果对年轻人对不健康亲密关系行为的认识提出了质疑,这些行为超出了强制性控制场景中所描述的公然和蓄意伤害行为。考虑到妇女和女孩遭受亲密伴侣暴力的风险增加,以及男性受害者报告和寻求帮助的比例较低,整个研究样本中在强制性控制意识方面的性别差异也令人担忧。结果证实了有必要开展专门的预防和干预工作,这些工作应关注亲密关系,并反映年轻人的多样化需求和经历。支持年轻人为自己采取行动是在他们自己的亲密关系中实现赋权的重要一步转变。