Raymaker Dora M, Scharer Mirah, Miller Rebecca, Widmer Ashley, Posadas Dhale Larsen, Keller Thomas E
Regional Research Institute, School of Social Work, Portland State University, 1600 SW 4 Avenue, Suite 900, Portland OR 97201.
Center for Interdisciplinary Mentoring Research, Portland State University, 1719 SW 10 Avenue, Portland, OR 97201.
J Women Minor Sci Eng. 2023;29(4):29-54. doi: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2022043449.
Various initiatives for undergraduates from historically underrepresented backgrounds attempt to address disparities in the completion of science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) degrees and the pursuit of careers in scientific research. Intensive research training programs for historically underrepresented undergraduates may include multiple components, such as authentic research experiences, advising and mentoring, supplemental curriculum, and financial assistance. Following comprehensive support during program participation, the post-program transition may present a vulnerable period in students' career trajectories. This study used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to investigate the experiences of students completing an intensive research training program to understand and develop recommendations for the post-program transition process. As a team of program alumni, academic researchers, and program staff, we developed, conducted, and analyzed semi-structured, open-ended interviews of recent program alumni and students approaching program completion (n=11; 55% female, 55% non-White). Applying thematic analysis at semantic and latent levels through a critical paradigm revealed the transition as a bittersweet experience, with feelings of pride and accomplishment mixed with sadness and anxiety. Findings also suggested the transition is described as a narrative influenced by preceding program experiences and adaptations. Financial concerns were prominent, and specific barriers and facilitators of successful transition included: aligned mentoring, negotiation of continued research employment, consideration of culture, planning for next steps, and engagement with the scholar community. Collaboratively, we developed recommendations for program improvements potentially relevant to similarly intensive STEM diversity programs. We also highlight the value of a CBPR approach that includes students equitably as co-researchers in program research and evaluation.
针对历史上代表性不足背景的本科生开展了各种举措,试图解决在完成科学、技术、工程、数学(STEM)学位以及从事科研职业方面存在的差距。针对历史上代表性不足的本科生的强化研究培训项目可能包括多个组成部分,如真实的研究经历、咨询与指导、补充课程以及经济援助。在项目参与期间获得全面支持后,项目结束后的过渡阶段可能成为学生职业轨迹中的一个脆弱时期。本研究采用基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)方法,调查完成强化研究培训项目的学生的经历,以了解并为项目结束后的过渡过程制定建议。作为一个由项目校友、学术研究人员和项目工作人员组成的团队,我们对近期的项目校友和即将完成项目的学生开展、进行并分析了半结构化、开放式访谈(n = 11;55%为女性,55%为非白人)。通过批判性范式在语义和潜在层面应用主题分析,揭示出过渡是一种苦乐参半的经历,自豪与成就感夹杂着悲伤与焦虑。研究结果还表明,过渡被描述为一种受先前项目经历和适应情况影响的叙述。经济担忧较为突出,成功过渡的具体障碍和促进因素包括:匹配的指导、协商继续从事研究工作、考虑文化因素、规划下一步以及与学者群体互动。我们共同为项目改进制定了建议,这些建议可能与类似的强化STEM多样性项目相关。我们还强调了CBPR方法的价值,该方法公平地将学生纳入项目研究和评估的共同研究人员之中。