Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Department of Life Sciences, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Department of Population Health and Immunity, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Immunol Cell Biol. 2023 Oct;101(9):857-866. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12682. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
Current serological tests cannot differentiate between total immunoglobulin A (IgA) and dimeric IgA (dIgA) associated with mucosal immunity. Here, we describe two new assays, dIgA-ELISA and dIgA-multiplex bead assay (MBA), that utilize the preferential binding of dIgA to a chimeric form of secretory component, allowing the differentiation between dIgA and monomeric IgA. dIgA responses elicited through severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were measured in (i) a longitudinal panel, consisting of 74 samples (n = 20 individuals) from hospitalized cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); (ii) a longitudinal panel, consisting of 96 samples (n = 10 individuals) from individuals with mild COVID-19; (iii) a cross-sectional panel with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection with mild COVID-19 (n = 199) and (iv) pre-COVID-19 samples (n = 200). The dIgA-ELISA and dIgA-MBA demonstrated a specificity for dIgA of 99% and 98.5%, respectively. Analysis of dIgA responses in the longitudinal panels revealed that 70% (ELISA) and 50% (MBA) of patients elicited a dIgA response by day 20 after PCR diagnosis with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Individuals with mild COVID-19 displayed increased levels of dIgA within the first 3 weeks after diagnosis but responses appeared to be short lived, compared with sustained IgA levels. However, in samples from hospitalized patients with COVID-19 we observed high and sustained levels of dIgA, up to 245 days after PCR diagnosis. Our results suggest that severe COVID-19 infections are associated with sustained levels of plasma dIgA compared with mild cases.
目前的血清学检测无法区分与黏膜免疫相关的总免疫球蛋白 A(IgA)和二聚体 IgA(dIgA)。在这里,我们描述了两种新的检测方法,即 dIgA-ELISA 和 dIgA-多重珠粒分析(MBA),它们利用 dIgA 对嵌合形式的分泌成分的优先结合,从而区分 dIgA 和单体 IgA。通过严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染引发的 dIgA 反应在以下方面进行了测量:(i)一个由 74 个样本组成的纵向面板(n=20 个人),来自住院的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者;(ii)一个由 96 个样本组成的纵向面板(n=10 个人),来自患有轻度 COVID-19 的个体;(iii)一个具有经 PCR 确认的 SARS-CoV-2 感染和轻度 COVID-19 的横截面面板(n=199);以及(iv)COVID-19 前样本(n=200)。dIgA-ELISA 和 dIgA-MBA 分别对 dIgA 的特异性为 99%和 98.5%。对纵向面板中 dIgA 反应的分析表明,在 PCR 诊断后第 20 天,70%(ELISA)和 50%(MBA)的患者产生了 dIgA 反应,这是 SARS-CoV-2 感染。患有轻度 COVID-19 的个体在诊断后前 3 周内显示出 dIgA 水平升高,但与持续的 IgA 水平相比,这些反应似乎是短暂的。然而,在 COVID-19 住院患者的样本中,我们观察到 dIgA 的高水平和持续存在,高达 PCR 诊断后 245 天。我们的结果表明,与轻度病例相比,严重的 COVID-19 感染与血浆 dIgA 的持续高水平有关。