Suppr超能文献

严重、中度和轻度 COVID-19 病例恢复期样本中 SARS-CoV-2 感染的血清学生物标志物分析。

Analysis of Serological Biomarkers of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Convalescent Samples From Severe, Moderate and Mild COVID-19 Cases.

机构信息

Lab of Viral Zoonotics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

DIOSynVax, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 19;12:748291. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.748291. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Precision monitoring of antibody responses during the COVID-19 pandemic is increasingly important during large scale vaccine rollout and rise in prevalence of (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOC). Equally important is defining Correlates of Protection (CoP) for SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease. Data from epidemiological studies and vaccine trials identified virus neutralising antibodies (Nab) and SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific (notably RBD and S) binding antibodies as candidate CoP. In this study, we used the World Health Organisation (WHO) international standard to benchmark neutralising antibody responses and a large panel of binding antibody assays to compare convalescent sera obtained from: a) COVID-19 patients; b) SARS-CoV-2 seropositive healthcare workers (HCW) and c) seronegative HCW. The ultimate aim of this study is to identify biomarkers of humoral immunity that could be used to differentiate severe from mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. Some of these biomarkers could be used to define CoP in further serological studies using samples from vaccination breakthrough and/or re-infection cases. Whenever suitable, the antibody levels of the samples studied were expressed in International Units (IU) for virus neutralisation assays or in Binding Antibody Units (BAU) for ELISA tests. In this work we used commercial and non-commercial antibody binding assays; a lateral flow test for detection of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG/IgM; a high throughput multiplexed particle flow cytometry assay for SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S), Nucleocapsid (N) and Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) proteins); a multiplex antigen semi-automated immuno-blotting assay measuring IgM, IgA and IgG; a pseudotyped microneutralisation test (pMN) and an electroporation-dependent neutralisation assay (EDNA). Our results indicate that overall, severe COVID-19 patients showed statistically significantly higher levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralising antibodies (average 1029 IU/ml) than those observed in seropositive HCW with mild or asymptomatic infections (379 IU/ml) and that clinical severity scoring, based on WHO guidelines was tightly correlated with neutralisation and RBD/S antibodies. In addition, there was a positive correlation between severity, N-antibody assays and intracellular virus neutralisation.

摘要

在大规模疫苗接种和(SARS-CoV-2)关注变体(VOC)流行率上升期间,对 COVID-19 大流行期间的抗体反应进行精确监测变得越来越重要。同样重要的是确定 SARS-CoV-2 感染和 COVID-19 疾病的保护相关因素(CoP)。来自流行病学研究和疫苗试验的数据确定了病毒中和抗体(Nab)和 SARS-CoV-2 抗原特异性(特别是 RBD 和 S)结合抗体作为候选 CoP。在这项研究中,我们使用世界卫生组织(WHO)国际标准来衡量中和抗体反应,并使用大量结合抗体检测试剂盒来比较从以下来源获得的恢复期血清:a)COVID-19 患者;b)SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性的医护人员(HCW)和 c)血清阴性的 HCW。这项研究的最终目的是确定可以用于区分严重和轻度或无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染的体液免疫标志物。其中一些标志物可用于使用疫苗突破性和/或再感染病例的血清学研究中定义 CoP。只要合适,研究样本的抗体水平就会以国际单位(IU)表示病毒中和测定或酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)试验中的结合抗体单位(BAU)。在这项工作中,我们使用了商业和非商业的抗体结合测定;一种用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 特异性 IgG/IgM 的侧向流动试验;一种用于 SARS-CoV-2 刺突(S)、核衣壳(N)和受体结合域(RBD)蛋白的高通量多重粒子流式细胞术检测;一种用于测量 IgM、IgA 和 IgG 的多重抗原半自动化免疫印迹检测;一种假型中和试验(pMN)和一种电穿孔依赖中和试验(EDNA)。我们的结果表明,总体而言,严重 COVID-19 患者的 SARS-CoV-2 特异性中和抗体水平(平均 1029 IU/ml)明显高于轻度或无症状感染的血清阳性 HCW(379 IU/ml),并且根据世界卫生组织指南进行的临床严重程度评分与中和和 RBD/S 抗体密切相关。此外,严重程度、N 抗体检测和细胞内病毒中和之间存在正相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a695/8640495/769c95efb70a/fimmu-12-748291-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验