Adeboye William, Osunronbi Temidayo, Faluyi David, Abankwa Efua, Abraha Semhar, Adamu-Biu Fatima, Ahmad Zain, Akhionbare Izieduwa, Chimba Chimba, Corriero Anna C, Ibeanusi Ikenna, Inyang Deborah, Jones Robert, Madume Rachael, Mberu Valentine, Mitoko Christine A, Nelson-Rowe Ellen, O'Riordan Marguerite, Shoker Serena, Sofela Agbolahan
Melanin Medics Research Network, Luton, LU4 8DY, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL6 8BT, United Kingdom.
Postgrad Med J. 2023 Oct 19;99(1177):1189-1196. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgad067.
We hypothesised that the gender/ethnic disparities and reductions in the UK academic-clinician workforce stem from research experience in medical school. This study investigated the factors influencing research engagement and academic-career interests among UK medical students.
Using a 42-item online questionnaire, a national multicentre cross-sectional survey of UK medical students was conducted over 9 weeks in the 2020/21 academic year. Multiple binary logistic and zero-inflated negative binomial regressions were used to evaluate associations between the predictor variables and research engagement (yes/no), number of research projects conducted, and academic-career interest (yes/no). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In total, 1573 students participated from 36 medical schools. No ethnic/gender differences in research engagement were observed. However, compared to men, women had a 31% decrease in the odds of being interested in an academic-clinician career [odds ratio (OR): 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52, 0.92]. Positive predictors of interest in academia were being a PubMed-indexed author (OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.38, 3.47) and having at least one national/international presentation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.88). Career progression was the primary motivating factor (67.1%) for pursuing research, whereas limited awareness of opportunities (68.0%) and time constraints (67.5%) were the most common barriers.
There were no ethnic differences in research engagement or academic-career intent. Although there were no gender differences in research engagement, female students were less likely to be interested in an academic career. This could be tackled by providing targeted opportunities to increase research productivity and self-efficacy in medical schools. Key messages: What is already known on this topic: There has been a decline in the number of academic clinicians, with a disproportionate gender and ethnic representation in the academic workforce. Engaging medical students in research activities during their medical training could mitigate the declining number of academic clinicians. Differential attainment occurs in medical school and persists after graduation. What this study adds: Although there were no gender/ethnic differences in research engagement amongst UK medical students, our study suggests that female students were less likely to be interested in pursuing an academic career. Time constraints, a lack of awareness of opportunities, and difficulty in finding research supervisors/mentors were the most common barriers to research engagement, whereas PubMed-indexed authorship was the strongest positive predictor of interest in an academic career. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: Medical schools should facilitate the selection of good-quality research mentors that would provide adequate support to ensure that their students' works are published in peer-reviewed journals. Medical schools should employ local research officers to increase students' awareness of research opportunities.
我们假设英国学术临床医生劳动力的性别/种族差异及减少源于医学院的研究经历。本研究调查了影响英国医学生研究参与度和学术职业兴趣的因素。
在2020/21学年的9周时间里,使用一份包含42个条目的在线问卷,对英国医学生进行了全国多中心横断面调查。采用多重二元逻辑回归和零膨胀负二项回归来评估预测变量与研究参与度(是/否)、开展的研究项目数量以及学术职业兴趣(是/否)之间的关联。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
共有来自36所医学院的1573名学生参与。未观察到研究参与度方面的种族/性别差异。然而,与男性相比,女性对学术临床医生职业感兴趣的几率降低了31%[优势比(OR):0.69;95%置信区间(CI):0.52,0.92]。对学术界感兴趣的积极预测因素是成为被PubMed索引的作者(OR:2.19;95% CI:1.38,3.47)以及至少有一次国内/国际报告(OR:1.40;95% CI:1.04,1.88)。职业发展是从事研究的主要激励因素(67.1%),而对机会的认识有限(68.0%)和时间限制(67.5%)是最常见的障碍。
在研究参与度或学术职业意向方面不存在种族差异。虽然在研究参与度上没有性别差异,但女学生对学术职业感兴趣的可能性较小。这可以通过在医学院提供有针对性的机会来提高研究生产力和自我效能来解决。关键信息:关于该主题已知的情况:学术临床医生数量有所下降,学术劳动力中性别和种族代表性不均衡。在医学培训期间让医学生参与研究活动可以缓解学术临床医生数量的下降。在医学院存在成绩差异,毕业后这种差异仍然存在。本研究补充的内容:虽然英国医学生在研究参与度方面没有性别/种族差异,但我们的研究表明女学生对从事学术职业的兴趣较小。时间限制、对机会缺乏认识以及难以找到研究导师是研究参与的最常见障碍,而被PubMed索引的作者身份是对学术职业感兴趣的最强积极预测因素。本研究可能对研究、实践或政策产生的影响:医学院应促进选择高质量的研究导师,这些导师应提供充分支持,以确保其学生的作品在同行评审期刊上发表。医学院应雇用当地研究人员,以提高学生对研究机会的认识。