• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经发育差异、恋童癖和性犯罪:两项在线调查的结果。

Neurodevelopmental Differences, Pedohebephilia, and Sexual Offending: Findings from Two Online Surveys.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion and Development, University of Bergen, 5020, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Psychology, Social & Legal Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):849-866. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02228-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s10508-021-02228-w
PMID:34993718
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8888371/
Abstract

The neurodevelopmental theory of pedohebephilia states that sexual interests in children arise from early neurodevelopmental perturbations, as, for example, evidenced by increased non-right-handedness, more childhood head injuries, and reduced intelligence and height. As corroborating evidence largely rests on samples of convicted men, we conducted online surveys among German-speaking (Study 1, N = 199) and English-speaking men (Study 2, N = 632), specifically targeting community members with pedohebephilic or teleiophilic interests. Although we detected theoretically meaningful sexual interest patterns in an embedded viewing time task, we could not detect expected neurodevelopmental differences between teleiophilic and pedohebephilic men in either of the two studies. Strikingly, pedohebephilic men who reported convictions for sexual offenses emerged as shorter and less intelligent than pedohebephilic men without convictions in Study 2. While elucidating possible third variable confounds, results have to be interpreted cautiously because of the methodological problems inherent to non-matched case control designs.

摘要

恋童癖和恋少年癖的神经发育理论指出,对儿童的性兴趣源于早期神经发育障碍,例如,惯用手为非右手、更多的儿童期头部受伤、以及智力和身高降低。由于佐证证据主要基于被定罪的男性样本,我们在德语人群中(研究 1,N=199)和英语人群中(研究 2,N=632)进行了在线调查,专门针对有恋童癖或恋少年癖好的社区成员。尽管我们在一项嵌入式观看时间任务中检测到了理论上有意义的性兴趣模式,但在这两项研究中,我们都未能检测到恋少年癖男性与恋童癖男性之间预期的神经发育差异。引人注目的是,在研究 2 中,报告有性犯罪定罪的恋童癖男性比没有定罪的恋童癖男性更矮、智力更低。虽然阐明了可能的第三方变量混杂因素,但由于非匹配病例对照设计固有的方法学问题,结果必须谨慎解释。

相似文献

1
Neurodevelopmental Differences, Pedohebephilia, and Sexual Offending: Findings from Two Online Surveys.神经发育差异、恋童癖和性犯罪:两项在线调查的结果。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):849-866. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02228-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
2
Pedohebephilia and Perceived Non-coercive Childhood Sexual Experiences: Two Non-matched Case-Control Studies.恋童癖和性虐待倾向与儿童期非强迫性性经历的关联:两项非匹配病例对照研究。
Sex Abuse. 2023 Apr;35(3):340-374. doi: 10.1177/10790632221098341. Epub 2022 May 12.
3
The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) May Be a Measure of Pedohebephilia.修订后的恋童癖兴趣筛查量表(SSPI-2)可能是恋童癖和恋少癖的一种测量工具。
J Sex Med. 2019 Oct;16(10):1655-1663. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
4
Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia.青少年色情癖阴茎测量测试的敏感性和特异性。
J Sex Med. 2015 Sep;12(9):1940-50. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12970. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
5
The Viewing Reaction Time as a Diagnostic Tool of Pedohebephilia in the Dunkelfeld.《暗区中窥淫癖的观看反应时间作为诊断工具》
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jan;53(1):25-42. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02662-y. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
6
Evidence of Construct Validity in the Assessment of Hebephilia.青春期恋评估中结构效度的证据。
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Jan;46(1):301-309. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0907-z. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
7
Validity in Phallometric Testing for Sexual Interests in Children: A Meta-Analytic Review.阴茎勃起测试在儿童性兴趣评估中的有效性:一项元分析综述。
Assessment. 2019 Apr;26(3):535-551. doi: 10.1177/1073191117706139. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
8
What if the Child Appears to Enjoy It? Moral Attitudes Toward Adult-Child Sex Among Men With and Without Pedohebephilia.如果孩子看起来很享受呢?有和没有恋童癖和恋童色情节的男性对成人与儿童之间性行为的道德态度。
J Sex Res. 2018 Sep;55(7):927-938. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1271101. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
9
Physical height in pedophilic and hebephilic sexual offenders.恋童癖和青春期前儿童性欲亢进的性犯罪者的身体身高。
Sex Abuse. 2007 Dec;19(4):395-407. doi: 10.1177/107906320701900405. Epub 2007 Oct 19.
10
The Predictive Validity of the Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2).修订版恋童癖兴趣筛查量表(SSPI-2)的预测效度。
Sex Abuse. 2023 Aug;35(5):649-663. doi: 10.1177/10790632221149696. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Stigma processes, psychological distress, and attitudes toward seeking treatment among pedohebephilic people.恋童癖和恋少年癖人群的污名化过程、心理困扰和治疗态度。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0312382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312382. eCollection 2024.
2
Modulation of the attentional response to baby schema by testosterone in pedohebephilic men and its relation to the nurturing system.睾丸激素对恋童癖男性对婴儿图式注意力反应的调制及其与养育系统的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 16;14(1):16385. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65572-6.
3
The Treatment Needs and Experiences of Pedohebephiles: A Systematic Review.恋童癖和恋少年癖患者的治疗需求和体验:系统评价。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Oct;53(9):3329-3346. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02943-0. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
4
The Viewing Reaction Time as a Diagnostic Tool of Pedohebephilia in the Dunkelfeld.《暗区中窥淫癖的观看反应时间作为诊断工具》
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jan;53(1):25-42. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02662-y. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
5
Fantasy Sexual Material Use by People with Attractions to Children.对儿童有吸引力的人使用幻想性行为材料。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023 Sep;25(9):395-404. doi: 10.1007/s11920-023-01435-7. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
6
Pedophile, Child Lover, or Minor-Attracted Person? Attitudes Toward Labels Among People Who are Sexually Attracted to Children.恋童癖者、儿童爱好者还是对未成年人有性吸引的人?对性吸引儿童的人群使用标签的态度。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Nov;51(8):4125-4139. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02331-6. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
7
Pedohebephilia and Perceived Non-coercive Childhood Sexual Experiences: Two Non-matched Case-Control Studies.恋童癖和性虐待倾向与儿童期非强迫性性经历的关联:两项非匹配病例对照研究。
Sex Abuse. 2023 Apr;35(3):340-374. doi: 10.1177/10790632221098341. Epub 2022 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Concordance and Discordance between Paraphilic Interests and Behaviors: A Follow-Up Study.性偏好兴趣与行为之间的一致性和不一致性:一项随访研究。
J Sex Res. 2022 Mar-Apr;59(3):385-390. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.1986801. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
2
How well do indirect measures assess sexual interest in children? A meta-analysis.间接测量评估儿童性兴趣的效果如何?一项荟萃分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Apr;89(4):350-363. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000627. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
3
Brain structure and clinical profile point to neurodevelopmental factors involved in pedophilic disorder.脑结构和临床特征指向恋童癖障碍中涉及的神经发育因素。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Apr;143(4):363-374. doi: 10.1111/acps.13273. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
4
Stigmatization of Paraphilias and Psychological Conditions Linked to Sexual Offending.性偏好障碍和与性犯罪相关的心理状况的污名化。
J Sex Res. 2021 May;58(4):438-447. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1754748. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
5
Are There Any Biomarkers for Pedophilia and Sexual Child Abuse? A Review.恋童癖和性虐待儿童是否存在生物标志物?综述
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 21;10:940. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00940. eCollection 2019.
6
Test-Retest Reliability and Temporal Agreement of Direct and Indirect Sexual Interest Measures.直接和间接性兴趣测量的重测信度及时间一致性
Sex Abuse. 2021 Apr;33(3):339-360. doi: 10.1177/1079063220904354. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
7
The Prevalence of Paraphilic Interests in the Czech Population: Preference, Arousal, the Use of Pornography, Fantasy, and Behavior.捷克人口中偏常性兴趣的流行情况:偏好、唤起、色情制品使用、幻想和行为。
J Sex Res. 2021 Jan;58(1):86-96. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1707468. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
Clinical characteristics associated with paedophilia and child sex offending - Differentiating sexual preference from offence status.与恋童癖和儿童性犯罪相关的临床特征-将性偏好与犯罪状态区分开来。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;51:74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
9
The uncertainty of psychological and psychiatric diagnoses.心理和精神诊断的不确定性。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Apr;30(4):556-560. doi: 10.1037/pas0000524. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
10
Executive Functioning in Pedophilia and Child Sexual Offending.恋童癖与儿童性犯罪中的执行功能
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Jul;23(6):460-470. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717000315. Epub 2017 May 17.