• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恋童癖和性虐待倾向与儿童期非强迫性性经历的关联:两项非匹配病例对照研究。

Pedohebephilia and Perceived Non-coercive Childhood Sexual Experiences: Two Non-matched Case-Control Studies.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion and Development, 9378University of Bergen, Norway.

Institute of Psychology, Social & Legal Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Sex Abuse. 2023 Apr;35(3):340-374. doi: 10.1177/10790632221098341. Epub 2022 May 12.

DOI:10.1177/10790632221098341
PMID:35549946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10041574/
Abstract

Research on the link between childhood sexual abuse experiences (CSAE) and pedohebephilia is limited by its focus on events that the respondents rate as abusive. We asked 199 German-speaking (Study 1) and 632 English-speaking (Study 2) men with and without self-reported pedohebephilia to complete the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) and scales to assess perceived non-coercive childhood sexual experiences with adults (PNCSE-A), and peers (PNCSE-P, only Study 2). A substantial number of participants with PNCSE-A disagreed with all items of the CTQ Sexual Abuse subscale (e.g., 35% and 26% of pedohebephilic men in Studies 1 and 2, 38% of teleiophilic men in Study 2). While pedohebephilic men reported more CSAE than teleiophilic men, the effects for PNCSE-A did not consistently point in the expected direction. In Study 2, conviction status for sexual offenses among pedohebephilic men was linked to higher rates of CSAE, PNCSE-A, PNCSE-P, physical neglect, and physical abuse. Pedohebephilic men in Study 2 also reported more PNCSE-P than teleiophilic men. Our results highlight the importance of assessing different (positive or neutral) perceptions of CSAE. Better controlled designs (e.g., matched case-control studies) are needed to substantiate whether and how perceived non-coercive childhood sexual experiences relate to pedohebephilia and sexual offending.

摘要

对儿童期性虐待经历(CSAE)与恋童癖之间联系的研究受到限制,因为它主要关注被调查者认为具有虐待性的事件。我们要求 199 名讲德语的(研究 1)和 632 名讲英语的(研究 2)有和没有自报告恋童癖的男性完成儿童期创伤问卷(CTQ)和评估感知非强制性儿童期与成人(PNCSE-A)和同伴(PNCSE-P,仅研究 2)发生的性经历的量表。相当一部分具有 PNCSE-A 的参与者不同意 CTQ 性虐待分量表的所有项目(例如,研究 1 和 2 中 35%和 26%的恋童癖男性,研究 2 中 38%的性欲旺盛的男性)。虽然恋童癖男性报告的 CSAE 多于性欲旺盛的男性,但 PNCSE-A 的影响并不总是朝着预期的方向发展。在研究 2 中,恋童癖男性的性犯罪定罪率与 CSAE、PNCSE-A、PNCSE-P、身体忽视和身体虐待的发生率较高有关。研究 2 中的恋童癖男性也报告了比性欲旺盛的男性更多的 PNCSE-P。我们的结果强调了评估 CSAE 的不同(积极或中性)感知的重要性。需要更好控制设计(例如,匹配的病例对照研究)来证实感知非强制性儿童期性经历与恋童癖和性犯罪之间的关系以及如何存在这种关系。

相似文献

1
Pedohebephilia and Perceived Non-coercive Childhood Sexual Experiences: Two Non-matched Case-Control Studies.恋童癖和性虐待倾向与儿童期非强迫性性经历的关联:两项非匹配病例对照研究。
Sex Abuse. 2023 Apr;35(3):340-374. doi: 10.1177/10790632221098341. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Neurodevelopmental Differences, Pedohebephilia, and Sexual Offending: Findings from Two Online Surveys.神经发育差异、恋童癖和性犯罪:两项在线调查的结果。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):849-866. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02228-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
3
The Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2) May Be a Measure of Pedohebephilia.修订后的恋童癖兴趣筛查量表(SSPI-2)可能是恋童癖和恋少癖的一种测量工具。
J Sex Med. 2019 Oct;16(10):1655-1663. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
4
Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia.青少年色情癖阴茎测量测试的敏感性和特异性。
J Sex Med. 2015 Sep;12(9):1940-50. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12970. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
5
The Viewing Reaction Time as a Diagnostic Tool of Pedohebephilia in the Dunkelfeld.《暗区中窥淫癖的观看反应时间作为诊断工具》
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jan;53(1):25-42. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02662-y. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
6
Evidence of Construct Validity in the Assessment of Hebephilia.青春期恋评估中结构效度的证据。
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Jan;46(1):301-309. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0907-z. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
7
Experienced Childhood Maltreatment in a Sample of Pedophiles: Comparisons With Patients of a Psychosomatic Outpatient Clinic and the General Population.在恋童癖者样本中经历过的儿童期虐待:与身心疾病门诊患者和普通人群的比较。
J Sex Med. 2020 May;17(5):985-993. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.01.019. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
8
The German Dunkelfeld project: a pilot study to prevent child sexual abuse and the use of child abusive images.德国“暗网”项目:一项预防儿童性虐待及儿童虐待图像使用的试点研究。
J Sex Med. 2015 Feb;12(2):529-42. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12785. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
9
Is Contact with Children Related to Legitimizing Beliefs Toward Sex with Children Among Men with Pedophilia?与儿童接触是否与恋童癖男性对与儿童发生性关系的合法化信仰有关?
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Feb;47(2):375-387. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1042-1. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
10
Sexual Attraction and Falling in Love in Persons with Pedohebephilia.恋童癖和恋少年癖者的性吸引和坠入爱河。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 May;49(4):1305-1318. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01579-9. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Childhood Adversity and Offense-Supportive Cognitions Among Czech Adults with a Sexual Interest in Violence or Children.童年逆境与性暴力或儿童相关兴趣成年人的犯罪支持认知。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jun;53(6):2159-2172. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02837-1. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
2
What do women with sexual interest in children tell us about the assumed cause of their sexual interest in children, (non-)disclosure, and professional help?-Results of a qualitative content analysis.对儿童有性兴趣的女性能就其对儿童产生性兴趣的假定原因、(未)披露情况及专业帮助向我们透露什么?——定性内容分析结果
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Mar;37(3):215-223. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00677-6. Epub 2023 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Reactions to Minor-Older and Minor-Peer Sex as a Function of Personal and Situational Variables in a Finnish Nationally Representative Student Sample.未成年人与大龄者和同龄人发生性关系的反应与个人和情境变量的关系:一项芬兰全国代表性学生样本研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):961-985. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02224-0. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Neurodevelopmental Differences, Pedohebephilia, and Sexual Offending: Findings from Two Online Surveys.神经发育差异、恋童癖和性犯罪:两项在线调查的结果。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):849-866. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02228-w. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
3
How well do indirect measures assess sexual interest in children? A meta-analysis.间接测量评估儿童性兴趣的效果如何?一项荟萃分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Apr;89(4):350-363. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000627. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
4
First Sexual Intercourse in the Irish Study of Sexual Health and Relationships: Current Functioning in Relation to Age at Time of Experience and Partner Age.爱尔兰性健康和性关系研究中的首次性行为:与体验时的年龄和伴侣年龄相关的当前功能。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Jan;50(1):289-310. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01721-y. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
Objective and subjective experiences of child maltreatment and their relationships with psychopathology.儿童虐待的客观和主观经历及其与精神病理学的关系。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Aug;4(8):811-818. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0880-3. Epub 2020 May 18.
6
Experienced Childhood Maltreatment in a Sample of Pedophiles: Comparisons With Patients of a Psychosomatic Outpatient Clinic and the General Population.在恋童癖者样本中经历过的儿童期虐待:与身心疾病门诊患者和普通人群的比较。
J Sex Med. 2020 May;17(5):985-993. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.01.019. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
7
The Prevalence of Paraphilic Interests in the Czech Population: Preference, Arousal, the Use of Pornography, Fantasy, and Behavior.捷克人口中偏常性兴趣的流行情况:偏好、唤起、色情制品使用、幻想和行为。
J Sex Res. 2021 Jan;58(1):86-96. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2019.1707468. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
Reactions of Boys and Girls to Sexual Abuse and to Sexual Encounters with Peers.男孩和女孩对性虐待和与同龄人发生性关系的反应。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Oct;48(10):1869-1882. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01111-1. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
9
Are There Early Risk Markers for Pedophilia? A Nationwide Case-Control Study of Child Sexual Exploitation Material Offenders.是否存在恋童癖的早期风险标志物?一项全国范围内的儿童性剥削材料犯罪者的病例对照研究。
J Sex Res. 2019 Feb;56(2):203-212. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2018.1492694. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
10
Toward a Neurodevelopmental Understanding of Pedophilia.迈向对恋童癖的神经发育理解
J Sex Med. 2018 Sep;15(9):1205-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.04.631. Epub 2018 May 31.