• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

普查差分隐私对小区域疾病制图监测健康不公平性的影响。

Impacts of census differential privacy for small-area disease mapping to monitor health inequities.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2023 Aug 18;9(33):eade8888. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade8888.

DOI:10.1126/sciadv.ade8888
PMID:37595037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10438951/
Abstract

The U.S. Census Bureau will implement a modernized privacy-preserving disclosure avoidance system (DAS), which includes application of differential privacy, on publicly released 2020 census data. There are concerns that the DAS may bias small-area and demographically stratified population counts, which play a critical role in public health research, serving as denominators in estimation of disease/mortality rates. Using three DAS demonstration products, we quantify errors attributable to reliance on DAS-protected denominators in standard small-area disease mapping models for characterizing health inequities. We conduct simulation studies and real data analyses of inequities in premature mortality at the census tract level in Massachusetts and Georgia. Results show that overall patterns of inequity by racialized group and economic deprivation level are not compromised by the DAS. While early versions of DAS induce errors in mortality rate estimation that are larger for Black than non-Hispanic white populations in Massachusetts, this issue is ameliorated in newer DAS versions.

摘要

美国人口普查局将在公开发布的 2020 年人口普查数据中实施一种现代化的隐私保护披露避免系统(DAS),其中包括差分隐私的应用。人们担心,DAS 可能会使小区域和人口分层的人口计数产生偏差,这些计数在公共卫生研究中起着至关重要的作用,是估计疾病/死亡率的分母。使用三种 DAS 演示产品,我们量化了由于依赖 DAS 保护的分母而导致的标准小区域疾病映射模型中用于描述健康不公平性的错误。我们对马萨诸塞州和佐治亚州的普查区一级过早死亡率的不公平性进行了模拟研究和真实数据分析。结果表明,按种族和经济贫困程度划分的不公平总体模式不会因 DAS 而受到影响。虽然早期版本的 DAS 会导致马萨诸塞州黑人群体的死亡率估计误差大于非西班牙裔白人,但在较新版本的 DAS 中,这个问题得到了缓解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/c0c2c39c4d39/sciadv.ade8888-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/6a4618d6ea25/sciadv.ade8888-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/ccaf36112811/sciadv.ade8888-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/9d637e38dacf/sciadv.ade8888-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/c2ccb0d51788/sciadv.ade8888-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/1f5547132bd0/sciadv.ade8888-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/c0c2c39c4d39/sciadv.ade8888-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/6a4618d6ea25/sciadv.ade8888-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/ccaf36112811/sciadv.ade8888-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/9d637e38dacf/sciadv.ade8888-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/c2ccb0d51788/sciadv.ade8888-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/1f5547132bd0/sciadv.ade8888-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6800/10438951/c0c2c39c4d39/sciadv.ade8888-f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Impacts of census differential privacy for small-area disease mapping to monitor health inequities.普查差分隐私对小区域疾病制图监测健康不公平性的影响。
Sci Adv. 2023 Aug 18;9(33):eade8888. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade8888.
2
Impact of Differential Privacy and Census Tract Data Source (Decennial Census Versus American Community Survey) for Monitoring Health Inequities.监测健康不平等状况的差分隐私和人口普查区数据源(十年一次的人口普查与美国社区调查)的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Feb;111(2):265-268. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305989. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
3
How differential privacy will affect our understanding of health disparities in the United States.差分隐私将如何影响我们对美国健康差异的理解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 16;117(24):13405-13412. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003714117. Epub 2020 May 28.
4
Evaluating bias and noise induced by the U.S. Census Bureau's privacy protection methods.评估美国人口普查局隐私保护方法引起的偏差和噪声。
Sci Adv. 2024 May 3;10(18):eadl2524. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adl2524. Epub 2024 May 1.
5
The 2020 US Census Differential Privacy Method Introduces Disproportionate Discrepancies for Rural and Non-White Populations.2020年美国人口普查的差分隐私方法给农村和非白人人口带来了不成比例的差异。
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022 Aug;41(4):1417-1430. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09698-3. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
The use of differential privacy for census data and its impact on redistricting: The case of the 2020 U.S. Census.差分隐私在人口普查数据中的应用及其对重新划分选区的影响:以2020年美国人口普查为例。
Sci Adv. 2021 Oct 8;7(41):eabk3283. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk3283. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
7
The effect of differential privacy on Medicaid participation among racial and ethnic minority groups.差异隐私对少数民族群体参与医疗补助的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec;57 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):207-213. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14000. Epub 2022 May 20.
8
Comparing denominator sources for real-time disease incidence modeling: American Community Survey and WorldPop.比较用于实时疾病发病率建模的分母数据源:美国社区调查和世界人口项目。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Apr 8;14:100786. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100786. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Reconstruction of age distributions from differentially private census data.从差分隐私人口普查数据中重建年龄分布
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022;41(6):2311-2329. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09734-2. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
10
Local Residential Segregation Matters: Stronger Association of Census Tract Compared to Conventional City-Level Measures with Fatal and Non-Fatal Assaults (Total and Firearm Related), Using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) for Racial, Economic, and Racialized Economic Segregation, Massachusetts (US), 1995-2010.本地居住隔离很重要:与传统城市层面的指标相比,使用极端集中度指数(ICE)衡量种族、经济和种族化经济隔离时,普查区与致命和非致命袭击(包括总数及与枪支相关的袭击)之间的关联更强,美国马萨诸塞州,1995 - 2010年
J Urban Health. 2017 Apr;94(2):244-258. doi: 10.1007/s11524-016-0116-z.

引用本文的文献

1
An empirical assessment of differential privacy in real-world observational data: a case-control study of asthma exacerbation in UK Biobank linked with electronic health records.现实世界观察数据中差分隐私的实证评估:英国生物银行与电子健康记录关联的哮喘加重病例对照研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 Aug 1;32(8):1328-1339. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf090.

本文引用的文献

1
The 2020 US Census Differential Privacy Method Introduces Disproportionate Discrepancies for Rural and Non-White Populations.2020年美国人口普查的差分隐私方法给农村和非白人人口带来了不成比例的差异。
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022 Aug;41(4):1417-1430. doi: 10.1007/s11113-022-09698-3. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
2
Statistical implications of endogeneity induced by residential segregation in small-area modelling of health inequities.居住隔离在健康不平等小区域建模中引发的内生性的统计影响。
Am Stat. 2022;76(2):142-151. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2021.2003245. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
3
The effect of differential privacy on Medicaid participation among racial and ethnic minority groups.
差异隐私对少数民族群体参与医疗补助的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec;57 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):207-213. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14000. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
The use of differential privacy for census data and its impact on redistricting: The case of the 2020 U.S. Census.差分隐私在人口普查数据中的应用及其对重新划分选区的影响:以2020年美国人口普查为例。
Sci Adv. 2021 Oct 8;7(41):eabk3283. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk3283. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
5
Comparing denominator sources for real-time disease incidence modeling: American Community Survey and WorldPop.比较用于实时疾病发病率建模的分母数据源:美国社区调查和世界人口项目。
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Apr 8;14:100786. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100786. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Impact of Differential Privacy and Census Tract Data Source (Decennial Census Versus American Community Survey) for Monitoring Health Inequities.监测健康不平等状况的差分隐私和人口普查区数据源(十年一次的人口普查与美国社区调查)的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Feb;111(2):265-268. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305989. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
7
How differential privacy will affect our understanding of health disparities in the United States.差分隐私将如何影响我们对美国健康差异的理解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 16;117(24):13405-13412. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2003714117. Epub 2020 May 28.
8
Small-area methods for investigation of environment and health.小区域环境与健康调查方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Apr 1;49(2):686-699. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa006.
9
Decomposition of the US black/white inequality in premature mortality, 2010-2015: an observational study.2010-2015 年美国黑/白过早死亡率差异的分解:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e029373. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029373.
10
Local Residential Segregation Matters: Stronger Association of Census Tract Compared to Conventional City-Level Measures with Fatal and Non-Fatal Assaults (Total and Firearm Related), Using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) for Racial, Economic, and Racialized Economic Segregation, Massachusetts (US), 1995-2010.本地居住隔离很重要:与传统城市层面的指标相比,使用极端集中度指数(ICE)衡量种族、经济和种族化经济隔离时,普查区与致命和非致命袭击(包括总数及与枪支相关的袭击)之间的关联更强,美国马萨诸塞州,1995 - 2010年
J Urban Health. 2017 Apr;94(2):244-258. doi: 10.1007/s11524-016-0116-z.