Thomas-Chemin Ophélie, Séverac Childérick, Trévisiol Emmanuelle, Dague Etienne
LAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
RESTORE Research Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, CNRS, EFS, ENVT, Université P. Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Micron. 2023 Nov;174:103523. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2023.103523. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
The models used to calculate Young's moduli from atomic force microscopy (AFM) force curves consider the shape of the indentation. It is then assumed that the geometry of the indentation is identical to the geometry of the indenter, which has been verified for hard materials (E > 1 MPa). Based on this assumption, the force curves calculated by these models, for the same object with a given Young's modulus, are different if the indenter geometry is different. On the contrary, we observe experimentally that the force curves recorded on soft living cells, with pyramidal, spherical, or tipless indenters, are almost similar. This indicates that this basic assumption on the indentation geometry does not work for soft materials (E of the order of 5 kPa or less). This means that, in this case, the shape of the indentation is therefore different from the shape of the indenter. Indentation of living cells by AFM is not what we thought!
用于根据原子力显微镜(AFM)力曲线计算杨氏模量的模型考虑了压痕的形状。然后假定压痕的几何形状与压头的几何形状相同,这已在硬质材料(E>1MPa)中得到验证。基于此假设,如果压头几何形状不同,对于具有给定杨氏模量的同一物体,这些模型计算出的力曲线也会不同。相反,我们通过实验观察到,使用金字塔形、球形或无尖压头在软质活细胞上记录的力曲线几乎相似。这表明关于压痕几何形状的这一基本假设不适用于软质材料(E约为5kPa或更低)。这意味着,在这种情况下,压痕的形状与压头的形状不同。原子力显微镜对活细胞的压痕并非我们所想的那样!