• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于乘法长短期记忆 (mLSTM) 深度学习模型和集成多准则决策 (MCDM) 模型的新型综合建模,用于绘制洪水风险图。

Novel integrated modelling based on multiplicative long short-term memory (mLSTM) deep learning model and ensemble multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) models for mapping flood risk.

机构信息

Department of Natural Resources Engineering, University of Hormozgan, Bandar-Abbas, Hormozgan, Iran.

Department of Natural Resources Engineering, University of Hormozgan, Bandar-Abbas, Hormozgan, Iran.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118838. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118838. Epub 2023 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118838
PMID:37595460
Abstract

Flood risk assessment is a key step in flood management and mitigation, and flood risk maps provide a quantitative measure of flood risk. Therefore, integration of deep learning - an updated version of machine learning techniques - and multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) models can generate high-resolution flood risk maps. In this study, a novel integrated approach has been developed based on multiplicative long short-term memory (mLSTM) deep learning models and an MCDM ensemble model to map flood risk in the Minab-Shamil plain, southern Iran. A flood hazard map generated by the mLSTM model is based on nine critical features selected by GrootCV (distance to the river, vegetation cover, variables extracted from DEM (digital elevation model) and river density) and a flood inventory map (70% and 30% data were randomly selected as training and test datasets, respectively). The values of all criteria used to assess model accuracy performance (except Cohens kappa for train dataset = 86, and for test dataset = 84) achieved values greater than 90, which indicates that the mLSTM model performed very well for the generation of a spatial flood hazard map. According to the spatial flood hazard map produced by mLSTM, the very low, low, moderate, high and very high classes cover 26%, 35.3%, 20.5%, 11.2% and 7% of the total area, respectively. Flood vulnerability maps were produced by the combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS), the evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), and the multi-objective optimization on the basis of simple ratio analysis (MOOSRA), and then validated by Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (SRC). Based on the SRC, the three models CODAS, EDAS, and MOOSRA showed high-ranking correlations with each other, and all three models were then used in the ensemble process. According to the CODAS-EDAS-MOOSRA ensemble model, 21.5%, 34.2%, 23.7%, 13%, and 7.6% of the total area were classified as having a very low to very high flood vulnerability, respectively. Finally, a flood risk map was generated by the combination of flood hazard and vulnerability maps produced by the mLSTM and MCDM ensemble model. According to the flood risk map, 27.4%, 34.3%, 14.8%, 15.7%, and 7.8% of the total area were classified as having a very low, low, moderate, high, and very high flood risk, respectively. Overall, the integration of mLSTM and the MCDM ensemble is a promising tool for generating precise flood risk maps and provides a useful reference for flood risk management.

摘要

洪水风险评估是洪水管理和减轻的关键步骤,洪水风险图提供了洪水风险的定量衡量标准。因此,将深度学习——机器学习技术的更新版本——与多准则决策 (MCDM) 模型集成可以生成高分辨率的洪水风险图。在这项研究中,开发了一种基于乘法长短期记忆 (mLSTM) 深度学习模型和 MCDM 集成模型的新方法,以绘制伊朗南部米纳布-沙米尔平原的洪水风险图。mLSTM 模型生成的洪水灾害图基于从 GrootCV 中选择的九个关键特征(到河流的距离、植被覆盖、从数字高程模型 (DEM) 提取的变量和河流密度)和洪水清单图(分别将 70%和 30%的数据随机选择为训练数据集和测试数据集)。用于评估模型准确性性能的所有标准的值(训练数据集的 Cohens kappa 值除外,为 86,测试数据集为 84)都达到了大于 90 的值,这表明 mLSTM 模型非常适合生成空间洪水灾害图。根据 mLSTM 生成的空间洪水灾害图,极低、低、中、高和极高等级分别覆盖总面积的 26%、35.3%、20.5%、11.2%和 7%。洪水脆弱性图是通过基于组合距离的评估 (CODAS)、基于平均解的距离评估 (EDAS) 和基于简单比率分析的多目标优化 (MOOSRA) 生成的,然后通过 Spearman 秩相关系数 (SRC) 进行验证。根据 SRC,CODAS、EDAS 和 MOOSRA 这三个模型之间存在高度相关的关系,并且这三个模型都被用于集成过程。根据 CODAS-EDAS-MOOSRA 集成模型,总区域的 21.5%、34.2%、23.7%、13%和 7.6%分别被归类为具有极低到极高的洪水脆弱性。最后,通过 mLSTM 和 MCDM 集成模型生成的洪水灾害图和脆弱性图的组合生成洪水风险图。根据洪水风险图,总区域的 27.4%、34.3%、14.8%、15.7%和 7.8%分别被归类为具有极低、低、中、高和极高洪水风险。总的来说,mLSTM 和 MCDM 集成是生成精确洪水风险图的有前途的工具,为洪水风险管理提供了有用的参考。

相似文献

1
Novel integrated modelling based on multiplicative long short-term memory (mLSTM) deep learning model and ensemble multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) models for mapping flood risk.基于乘法长短期记忆 (mLSTM) 深度学习模型和集成多准则决策 (MCDM) 模型的新型综合建模,用于绘制洪水风险图。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118838. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118838. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
2
Coastal Flood risk assessment using ensemble multi-criteria decision-making with machine learning approaches.基于集成多准则决策和机器学习方法的沿海洪灾风险评估。
Environ Res. 2024 Mar 15;245:118042. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.118042. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
3
AHP and TOPSIS based flood risk assessment- a case study of the Navsari City, Gujarat, India.基于层次分析法和逼近理想解排序法的洪水风险评估——以印度古吉拉特邦那萨里市为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Jun 17;194(7):509. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10111-x.
4
Integrating machine learning and geospatial data analysis for comprehensive flood hazard assessment.将机器学习和地理空间数据分析相结合进行全面的洪水灾害评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jul;31(35):48497-48522. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34286-7. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
5
A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modelling of GIS-based TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS techniques in the Sub-Himalayan foothills region of Eastern India.基于 GIS 的 TOPSIS、VIKOR 和 EDAS 技术在印度东部次喜马拉雅山麓地区洪水易感性建模的比较评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):16036-16067. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23168-5. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
6
Modelling flood susceptibility based on deep learning coupling with ensemble learning models.基于深度学习与集成学习模型融合的洪水易发性建模。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 1;325(Pt A):116450. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116450. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
7
Flood risk mapping and analysis using an integrated framework of machine learning models and analytic hierarchy process.使用机器学习模型和层次分析法的集成框架进行洪水风险映射与分析。
Risk Anal. 2023 Jul;43(7):1478-1495. doi: 10.1111/risa.14018. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
8
How far spatial resolution affects the ensemble machine learning based flood susceptibility prediction in data sparse region.空间分辨率对数据稀疏地区基于集成机器学习的洪水易发性预测的影响程度。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Nov 1;297:113344. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113344. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
9
Interpretability of simple RNN and GRU deep learning models used to map land susceptibility to gully erosion.用于绘制土地易受沟壑侵蚀程度的简单循环神经网络(RNN)和门控循环单元(GRU)深度学习模型的可解释性。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 15;904:166960. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166960. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
10
Assessment of vulnerability to flood risk in the Padma River Basin using hydro-morphometric modeling and flood susceptibility mapping.利用水-形态计量建模和洪水易感性制图评估帕德玛河流域的洪水风险脆弱性。
Environ Monit Assess. 2024 Jun 25;196(7):661. doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-12780-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating best nanomaterial for energy harvesting through reinforcement learning DQN coupled with fuzzy PROMETHEE under road-based conditions.基于道路条件下,通过结合模糊偏好顺序结构评估法的深度Q网络强化学习估算最佳能量收集纳米材料
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 14;14(1):24073. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72194-5.