Suppr超能文献

不同调节活动对业余足球运动员的急性影响。

Acute Effects of Different Conditioning Activities on Amateur Soccer Players.

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.

School of Physical Education, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Sports Med. 2023 Nov;44(12):882-888. doi: 10.1055/a-2126-5972. Epub 2023 Aug 18.

Abstract

Several warm-up activities are used to prepare soccer players for training and games. However, few studies have focused on comparing different activities (strength vs. stretching) in young and amateur athletes, especially for performance improvement in explosive actions. Thus, in order to compare the effect of four conditioning activities on jump and sprint performances, 12 soccer athletes (age: 19±0.8; weight (kg): 72.8±8.0; height (cm): 180±6.7) performed four warm-up activities: strength exercise (cluster system), combined exercise, plyometric exercise, and static stretching (control). The countermovement jump (CMJ) and 30-meter run (30-m Sprint) were performed 10 min after each experimental condition. A ONE-WAY ANOVA test of repeated measures was conducted with a Tukey's post-hoc test to compare the conditions. The strength conditioning activity protocol (33.68±2.87) showed a significant difference for the CMJ from static stretching (30.96±3.16) (p>0.05). There were significant differences regarding the 30-m Sprint test between strength conditioning (4.72±0.19) and combined activities (4.71±0.21) compared to static stretching (4.84±0.21) (p>0.05). In conclusion, the combined conditioning activity and strength protocols can be chosen in warm-up activities instead of static stretching (control condition) for improved immediate sprint and jump abilities in amateur soccer players.

摘要

有几种热身活动可用于让足球运动员为训练和比赛做好准备。然而,很少有研究关注不同活动(力量与拉伸)在年轻和业余运动员中的比较,特别是对于爆发力动作的表现提升。因此,为了比较四种调节活动对跳跃和冲刺表现的影响,12 名足球运动员(年龄:19±0.8;体重(kg):72.8±8.0;身高(cm):180±6.7)进行了四项热身活动:力量训练(集群系统)、综合训练、弹震式训练和静态拉伸(对照)。在每个实验条件后 10 分钟进行了反跳(CMJ)和 30 米跑(30-m Sprint)。采用重复测量的 ONE-WAY ANOVA 检验进行了 Tukey 事后检验以比较条件。力量调节活动方案(33.68±2.87)在 CMJ 方面与静态拉伸(30.96±3.16)(p>0.05)有显著差异。在 30 米冲刺测试方面,力量调节(4.72±0.19)和综合活动(4.71±0.21)与静态拉伸(4.84±0.21)相比有显著差异(p>0.05)。总之,在热身活动中,可以选择综合调节活动和力量训练方案,而不是静态拉伸(对照条件),以提高业余足球运动员的即时冲刺和跳跃能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验