• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左侧卧位胸腔镜食管癌手术困难相关因素分析:单中心回顾性研究。

Analysis of factors associated with operative difficulty in thoracoscopic esophageal cancer surgery in the left-decubitus position: a single-center retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takara- machi, Kanazawa, 920-8641, Ishikawa, Japan.

Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinadamachi, Kahoku, 920-0293, Ishikawa, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02131-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-023-02131-2
PMID:37596560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10439606/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The degree of difficulty in the overall procedure and forceps handling encountered by surgeons is greatly influenced by the positional relationship of intrathoracic organs in minimally invasive esophagectomy. This study aimed to identify the anatomical factors associated with the difficulty of minimally invasive esophagectomy assessed by intraoperative injuries and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the left-decubitus position was performed in 258 patients. We defined α (mm) as the anteroposterior distance between the front of the vertebral body and aorta, β (mm) as the distance between the center of the vertebral body and center of the aorta, and γ (degree) as the angle formed at surgeon's right-hand port site by insertion of lines from the front of aorta and from the front of vertebrae in the computed tomography slice at the operator's right-hand forceps hole level. We retrospectively analyzed the correlations among clinico-anatomical factors, surgeon- or assistant-caused intraoperative organ injuries, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Intraoperative injuries significantly correlated with shorter α (0.2 vs. 3.9), longer β (33.0 vs. 30.5), smaller γ (3.0 vs. 4.3), R1 resection (18.5% vs. 8.3%), and the presence of intrathoracic adhesion (46% vs. 26%) compared with the non-injured group. Division of the median values into two groups showed that shorter α and smaller γ were significantly associated with organ injury. Longer β was significantly associated with postoperative tachycardia onset, respiratory complications, and mediastinal recurrence. Furthermore, the occurrence of intraoperative injuries was significantly associated with the onset of postoperative pulmonary complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathoracic anatomical features greatly affected the procedural difficulty of minimally invasive esophagectomy, suggesting that preoperative computed tomography simulation and appropriate port settings may improve surgical outcomes.

摘要

背景

微创食管切除术(MIE)中,胸腔内器官的位置关系极大地影响了外科医生在整个手术过程中遇到的难度和使用器械的难度。本研究旨在确定与微创食管切除术中术中损伤和术后结果相关的解剖因素。

方法

对 258 例左卧位 MIE 患者进行研究。我们将α(mm)定义为椎体前缘与主动脉前缘之间的前后距离,β(mm)定义为椎体中心与主动脉中心之间的距离,γ(度)定义为在术者右手操作孔层面的 CT 切片上,从主动脉前缘和椎体前缘插入线在术者右手器械孔处形成的角度。我们回顾性分析了临床解剖因素、术者或助手引起的术中器官损伤以及术后并发症之间的相关性。

结果

术中损伤与较短的α(0.2 比 3.9)、较长的β(33.0 比 30.5)、较小的γ(3.0 比 4.3)、R1 切除(18.5%比 8.3%)和胸腔内粘连(46%比 26%)显著相关。将中位数分为两组,结果显示较短的α和较小的γ与器官损伤显著相关。较长的β与术后心动过速发作、呼吸并发症和纵隔复发显著相关。此外,术中损伤的发生与术后肺部并发症的发生显著相关。

结论

胸腔内解剖特征极大地影响了微创食管切除术的手术难度,提示术前 CT 模拟和适当的端口设置可能改善手术结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f25/10439606/94e3efa36a88/12893_2023_2131_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f25/10439606/aa037c5933a0/12893_2023_2131_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f25/10439606/94e3efa36a88/12893_2023_2131_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f25/10439606/aa037c5933a0/12893_2023_2131_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f25/10439606/94e3efa36a88/12893_2023_2131_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of factors associated with operative difficulty in thoracoscopic esophageal cancer surgery in the left-decubitus position: a single-center retrospective study.左侧卧位胸腔镜食管癌手术困难相关因素分析:单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02131-2.
2
Predictive factors of difficulty of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the left decubitus position.左侧卧位胸腔镜食管切除术困难的预测因素。
Esophagus. 2019 Jul;16(3):316-323. doi: 10.1007/s10388-019-00663-2. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
3
Utility of thoracic cage width in assessing surgical difficulty of minimally invasive esophagectomy in left lateral decubitus position.评估左侧卧位微创食管切除术手术难度的胸腔宽度的实用性。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3479-3486. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07125-x. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
4
Thoracoscopic and hand assisted laparoscopic esophagectomy with radical lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the left lateral decubitus position: a single center retrospective analysis of 654 patients.左侧卧位下胸腹腔镜联合根治性淋巴结清扫术治疗食管鳞癌 654 例回顾性分析。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 10;17(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3743-1.
5
Effect of the postural transition in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.微创食管切除术中转体位的效果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):3947-3956. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08714-5. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
6
Intraoperative fluid therapy and postoperative complications during minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a single-center retrospective study.食管癌微创食管切除术中的术中液体治疗与术后并发症:一项单中心回顾性研究。
J Anesth. 2020 Jun;34(3):404-412. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02766-y. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
7
[Clinical application and analysis of single-port laparoscopic and thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer].单孔腹腔镜与胸腔镜McKeown食管癌切除术的临床应用与分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 3;101(29):2316-2321. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201215-03359.
8
[The efficacy and safety analysis of cervical and abdominal double single-port minimally invasive esophagectomy].[颈腹双单孔微创食管切除术的疗效与安全性分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 20;103(23):1767-1773. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230110-00057.
9
Major Intraoperative Complications During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.微创食管切除术的主要术中并发症。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8244-8250. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14340-3. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
10
Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.影响微创食管切除术胸段手术难度的因素。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4279-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4743-3. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing the difficulty of video-assisted thoracoscopic anterior mediastinal tumor resection via the subxiphoid approach.影响经剑突下入路电视胸腔镜辅助前纵隔肿瘤切除术难度的因素。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jun 30;17(6):3568-3576. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2291. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
2
Effect of inspiratory muscle training in esophageal cancer patients receiving esophagectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.吸气肌训练对食管癌患者术后的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 16;19(7):e0307069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307069. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Short-Term Outcome of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Conventional Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.机器人辅助微创与传统胸腔镜食管癌根治术治疗胸段食管癌近期疗效的倾向性匹配分析。
World J Surg. 2022 Aug;46(8):1926-1933. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06567-0. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
2
Usefulness of prone-position computed tomography as preoperative simulation prior to thoracoscopic esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer.术前俯卧位 CT 对胸段食管癌胸腔镜手术的模拟价值。
Esophagus. 2021 Oct;18(4):764-772. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00852-y. Epub 2021 May 17.
3
Esophageal Position Affects Short-Term Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.
食管位置对微创食管切除术短期结局的影响:一项回顾性多中心研究。
World J Surg. 2020 Mar;44(3):831-837. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05273-8.
4
Predictive factors of difficulty of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the left decubitus position.左侧卧位胸腔镜食管切除术困难的预测因素。
Esophagus. 2019 Jul;16(3):316-323. doi: 10.1007/s10388-019-00663-2. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
Can Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Replace Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer? Latest Analysis of 24,233 Esophagectomies From the Japanese National Clinical Database.微创食管癌切除术能否替代开放性食管癌切除术?日本国家临床数据库 24233 例食管癌切除术的最新分析。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jul;272(1):118-124. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003222.
6
Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与开胸经胸食管癌切除术治疗可切除食管癌的随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):621-630. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003031.
7
Preoperative Smoking Cessation is Integral to the Prevention of Postoperative Morbidities in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.术前戒烟对于预防微创食管切除术后的并发症至关重要。
World J Surg. 2018 Sep;42(9):2902-2909. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4572-3.
8
Quality of life after robot-assisted transmediastinal radical surgery for esophageal cancer.机器人辅助经胸食管癌根治术后的生活质量。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2249-2254. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5918-x. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
9
Risk factors for pulmonary morbidities after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.微创食管癌根治术后肺部并发症的危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2852-2858. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5993-z. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
10
Impact of unplanned events on early postoperative results of minimally invasive esophagectomy.计划性事件对微创食管切除术早期术后结果的影响。
Thorac Cancer. 2018 Jan;9(1):94-98. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12544. Epub 2017 Oct 30.