• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计划性事件对微创食管切除术早期术后结果的影响。

Impact of unplanned events on early postoperative results of minimally invasive esophagectomy.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Esophageal Cancer Division, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Thorac Cancer. 2018 Jan;9(1):94-98. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12544. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1111/1759-7714.12544
PMID:29083537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5754283/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is increasingly performed worldwide. Unplanned events during thoracoscopy or laparoscopy can jeopardize the procedure, sometimes necessitating conversion to open surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of unplanned events on early postoperative outcomes after MIE.

METHOD

A consecutive group of 303 patients who underwent MIE between January 2011 and December 2015 were reviewed. The patients were allocated to two groups comprising those with (G-UPE, 85 patients) and without unplanned events (G-Regular, 218 patients). Unplanned events, defined as events that clearly changed or prolonged the procedure included intraoperative bleeding, chest and/or peritoneal adhesions, tumor invasion (sT4a + T4b), non-radical resection (R2 resection), and conversion for any reason. Differences in postoperative complications between the groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

The most common unplanned events were pleural and/or peritoneal adhesions (28/89, 31.5%), followed by intraoperative discovery of tumor invasion (sT4a + T4b, 25/89, 28.1%). There were significant differences in the incidence of respiratory (57.6% vs. 8.3%) and nervous system complications (10.6% vs. 2.7%), postoperative infection (32.9% vs. 5.0%), and chylothorax (8.2% vs. 0.9%) between the G-UPE and G-Regular groups, respectively (P < 0.05). The most common reasons for conversion to open procedures were pleural and/or peritoneal adhesions (9/38, 23.8%) and intraoperative bleeding (7/38, 18.4%). The main reasons for R2 resection were tumor invasion of the trachea or bronchus (7/21, 33.2%) and of the aorta (5/21, 23.8%).

CONCLUSION

Unplanned events during MIE increase the incidence of postoperative complications. Improved clinical staging and more careful surgery minimize unplanned events.

摘要

背景

微创食管切除术(MIE)在全球范围内的应用日益增多。胸腔镜或腹腔镜手术中的意外事件可能会危及手术过程,有时需要转为开放性手术。本研究旨在评估 MIE 后早期术后并发症中意外事件的影响。

方法

回顾性分析 2011 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间接受 MIE 的 303 例连续患者。将患者分为两组:有(G-UPE,85 例)和无(G-Regular,218 例)意外事件组。意外事件定义为明显改变或延长手术的事件,包括术中出血、胸腔和/或腹膜粘连、肿瘤侵犯(sT4a + T4b)、非根治性切除(R2 切除)和因任何原因转为开放性手术。分析两组术后并发症的差异。

结果

最常见的意外事件是胸腔和/或腹膜粘连(28/89,31.5%),其次是术中发现肿瘤侵犯(sT4a + T4b,25/89,28.1%)。G-UPE 组和 G-Regular 组在呼吸系统(57.6% vs. 8.3%)和神经系统并发症(10.6% vs. 2.7%)、术后感染(32.9% vs. 5.0%)和乳糜胸(8.2% vs. 0.9%)的发生率方面存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。转为开放性手术的最常见原因是胸腔和/或腹膜粘连(9/38,23.8%)和术中出血(7/38,18.4%)。R2 切除的主要原因是肿瘤侵犯气管或支气管(7/21,33.2%)和主动脉(5/21,23.8%)。

结论

MIE 术中意外事件增加了术后并发症的发生率。提高临床分期和更仔细的手术可减少意外事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fe4/5754283/58f58cf6047d/TCA-9-94-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fe4/5754283/58f58cf6047d/TCA-9-94-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fe4/5754283/58f58cf6047d/TCA-9-94-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of unplanned events on early postoperative results of minimally invasive esophagectomy.计划性事件对微创食管切除术早期术后结果的影响。
Thorac Cancer. 2018 Jan;9(1):94-98. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12544. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
2
Conversion to open surgery during minimally invasive esophagectomy portends worse short-term outcomes: an analysis of the National Cancer Database.微创食管切除术中转开胸手术预示着更差的短期结局:国家癌症数据库分析。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3470-3478. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07124-y. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
3
Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.食管癌颈部吻合术的微创与开放食管切除术比较:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Jun 8;15(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01182-3.
4
Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer.将腹腔镜手术纳入微创食管切除术是否有获益?对食管癌患者围手术期结果的影响。
World J Surg. 2011 Apr;35(4):790-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-0955-4.
5
Outcomes After Converted Minimally Invasive to Open Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer.食管癌患者微创转为开放食管切除术的结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Nov;112(5):1593-1599. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.11.025. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
6
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.
7
Total minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma reduces postoperative pain and pneumonia compared to hybrid esophagectomy.全微创食管腺癌切除术与杂交食管切除术相比,可减少术后疼痛和肺炎。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4957-4965. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6257-2. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
8
The impact of combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery on pulmonary complications after radical esophagectomy in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.胸腔镜与腹腔镜联合手术对可切除食管癌患者根治性食管切除术后肺部并发症的影响
Anticancer Res. 2014 May;34(5):2399-404.
9
Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy.新辅助治疗后开放与微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术的疗效
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):1097-103. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.062. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
10
Can Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Replace Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer? Latest Analysis of 24,233 Esophagectomies From the Japanese National Clinical Database.微创食管癌切除术能否替代开放性食管癌切除术?日本国家临床数据库 24233 例食管癌切除术的最新分析。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jul;272(1):118-124. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003222.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction model using risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive esophagectomy.使用与微创食管切除术后吻合口漏相关危险因素的预测模型。
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Sep-Oct;39(5):1345-1349. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.5.8050.
2
Analysis of factors associated with operative difficulty in thoracoscopic esophageal cancer surgery in the left-decubitus position: a single-center retrospective study.左侧卧位胸腔镜食管癌手术困难相关因素分析:单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02131-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Current Advancement in Multidisciplinary Treatment for Resectable cStage II/III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Japan.日本可切除的Ⅱ/Ⅲ期食管鳞状细胞癌多学科治疗的当前进展
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Oct 20;22(5):275-283. doi: 10.5761/atcs.ra.16-00111. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
2
Outcomes, quality of life, and survival after esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches.根治性食管切除术治疗食管鳞癌的疗效、生活质量和生存率:手术方式的倾向评分匹配比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;149(4):1006-14; discussion 1014- 5.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.12.063. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
3
Evaluation of safety profile of thoracoscopic esophagectomy for T1bN0M0 cancer using data from JCOG0502: a prospective multicenter study.
利用JCOG0502的数据评估T1bN0M0期食管癌胸腔镜食管切除术的安全性:一项前瞻性多中心研究
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3519-26. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4102-4. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
4
Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.对于患有食管癌和胃食管交界癌的患者,与开放或杂交食管切除术相比,微创食管切除术具有显著的生存优势。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):672-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.023. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
5
Feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.新辅助放化疗后微创食管切除术的可行性
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Oct;24(10):688-92. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0118. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
6
A comparative study of survival after minimally invasive and open oesophagectomy.微创与开放食管切除术后生存率的比较研究
Surg Endosc. 2015 Feb;29(2):431-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3694-4. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
7
Outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后微创食管癌切除术的结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):439-45. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.042. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
8
Open versus thoracoscopic esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.食管鳞状细胞癌患者开放性与胸腔镜下食管切除术的比较
World J Surg. 2014 Feb;38(2):402-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2265-5.
9
Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.微创食管切除术的结果:超过 1000 例患者的回顾。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603.
10
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.微创与开放手术治疗食管癌的疗效比较:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. Epub 2012 May 1.