Matthews S M, Roper M T, Mosher L R, Menn A Z
Schizophr Bull. 1979;5(2):322-33. doi: 10.1093/schbul/5.2.322.
The efficacy of antipsychotic drug maintenance in reducing the risk of relapse among previously hospitalized schizophrenic patients has been well documented. However, data from an ongoing study comparing two cohorts of young first admission schizophrenics--one receiving neuroleptic-oriented treatment on the wards of a community mental health center (CMHC), the other an intensive interpersonal approach in a small homelike facility in the community (Soteria House)--raise questions about the routine use of neuroleptics with this population. Our questioning of this practice is based on data analyzed from these two cohorts by means of the life table, a statistical technique appropriate for longitudinal studies. Data are presented in two ways: (1) The overall effectiveness of the two independent treatment programs (Soteria, N = 32, vs. CMHC, N = 36) is compared in terms of the probabilities of not being readmitted over the 2-year postdischarge interval. (2) Analyses that look at the influence of the original treatment setting and postdischarge antipsychotic drug status on readmission rates are presented. Program comparisons reveal Soteria patients to have a consistently higher survival rate than CMHC patients throughout 2 years postdischarge. At 12 months postdischarge, the cumulative probability of remaining well (no readmissions) significantly favors the Soteria patients (p less than .05, Mantel chi2). The overall results of the Soteria program were achieved despite the fact that all CMHC patients received neuroleptics during their original inpatient stays and about 50 percent were maintained on neuroleptics up to the point of readmission or study termination, whereas only 10 percent of Soteria subjects were treated with or maintained on neuroleptics. The survival rates by postdischarge drug status and program affiliation show the Soteria no-drug group to have the highest proportion of survivors at almost every interval throughout 24 months, the CMHC drug-maintained group to have the lowest survival rate, and the CMHC unmaintained group to be surviving at a rate generally comparable to the Soteria no-drug group.
抗精神病药物维持治疗在降低既往住院的精神分裂症患者复发风险方面的疗效已有充分记录。然而,一项正在进行的研究的数据对这一人群常规使用抗精神病药物提出了质疑。该研究比较了两组首次入院的年轻精神分裂症患者——一组在社区心理健康中心(CMHC)病房接受以抗精神病药物为主的治疗,另一组在社区中一个类似家庭的小型机构(索泰里亚之家)接受强化人际治疗。我们对这种做法的质疑基于通过生命表对这两组患者数据进行分析的结果,生命表是一种适用于纵向研究的统计技术。数据以两种方式呈现:(1)比较两个独立治疗项目(索泰里亚组,N = 32;CMHC组,N = 36)在出院后2年期间未再次入院概率方面的总体有效性。(2)呈现分析原始治疗环境和出院后抗精神病药物状态对再入院率影响的结果。项目比较显示,在出院后的2年中,索泰里亚组患者的生存率始终高于CMHC组患者。出院后12个月时,保持良好状态(未再次入院)的累积概率明显有利于索泰里亚组患者(p <.05,曼特尔卡方检验)。尽管所有CMHC组患者在最初住院期间都接受了抗精神病药物治疗,并且约50%的患者在再次入院或研究结束时仍持续使用抗精神病药物,但索泰里亚组项目仍取得了总体效果,而索泰里亚组只有10%的受试者接受了抗精神病药物治疗或持续使用该药物。根据出院后药物状态和项目归属得出的生存率表明,索泰里亚组未用药组在24个月的几乎每个时间段内幸存者比例最高,CMHC组持续用药组生存率最低,CMHC组未持续用药组的生存率总体上与索泰里亚组未用药组相当。