• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷比较典型的泰国人和匈牙利人人格特征。

Comparison of typical Thai and Hungarian personality profiles using the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire.

机构信息

Centre of Specialist Postgraduate Programmes in Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church, Budapest, 1037, Hungary.

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawarorot Rd., T. Sriphoom, A. Meung Chiang Mai, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 19;13(1):13508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40654-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-40654-z
PMID:37598240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10439948/
Abstract

The aim of our study was to compare typical Thai and Hungarian personality profiles of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ). 672 Thai and 647 Hungarian were included in our study. The distribution of age, gender and education level were matched. The ZKA-PQ was administered that measures Aggression, Extraversion, Activity, Sensation Seeking and Neuroticism. We tested reliability, the structural invariance and analyzed aggregated mean profiles for cultures as well as typical profiles by cluster analyses. Reliability of factors were acceptable in both cultures, but some facets (especially AC3 Restlessness) showed low reliability. The global Tucker's coefficient of congruence (TCC) for cross-cultural factorial invariance was 95. We have also run a Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis, but fit indices were not adequate. Cross-cultural neural network invariance was not met either. Hungarians scored significantly higher on Extraversion, Sensation Seeking, Aggression and Activity. Cluster-analyses revealed six typical profiles: Introverted impulsive, Reserved, Resilients, Overcontrolled, Aggressive impulsive and Positive sensation seeker. Majority of first two clusters were Thai respondents, majority for last two clusters were Hungarians. In sum, there were some cross-cultural congruence in factor structure, but strict invariance was not fulfilled. Comparison of mean profiles remain tentative, but cluster analysis revealed cross-cultural differences in typical profiles.

摘要

我们的研究目的是比较泰国和匈牙利的 Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷(ZKA-PQ)的典型人格特征。我们的研究纳入了 672 名泰国人和 647 名匈牙利人。年龄、性别和教育水平的分布相匹配。我们使用 ZKA-PQ 进行了测量,该问卷可测量攻击性、外向性、活动水平、感觉寻求和神经质。我们测试了文化间的可靠性、结构不变性以及聚合平均特征,并通过聚类分析分析了典型特征。两种文化的因素可靠性都可以接受,但有些方面(尤其是 AC3 不安)的可靠性较低。跨文化因素不变性的全局塔克一致性系数(TCC)为 95。我们还进行了多组验证性因素分析,但拟合指数不够理想。跨文化神经网络不变性也没有得到满足。匈牙利人在外向性、感觉寻求、攻击性和活动水平方面的得分显著更高。聚类分析揭示了六种典型特征:内向冲动型、保守型、坚韧型、过度控制型、攻击性冲动型和积极感觉寻求型。前两个聚类的大多数受访者是泰国人,后两个聚类的大多数受访者是匈牙利人。总的来说,在因素结构上存在一些跨文化的一致性,但严格的不变性并没有得到满足。平均特征的比较仍然是暂定的,但聚类分析揭示了典型特征的跨文化差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/7d3a07ebeadc/41598_2023_40654_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/80b0ef9d041a/41598_2023_40654_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/ec4365e84abe/41598_2023_40654_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/b17a169b27c0/41598_2023_40654_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/2bb28529c495/41598_2023_40654_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/19a0221c43e6/41598_2023_40654_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/eab9dd281a7e/41598_2023_40654_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/7d3a07ebeadc/41598_2023_40654_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/80b0ef9d041a/41598_2023_40654_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/ec4365e84abe/41598_2023_40654_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/b17a169b27c0/41598_2023_40654_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/2bb28529c495/41598_2023_40654_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/19a0221c43e6/41598_2023_40654_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/eab9dd281a7e/41598_2023_40654_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0ba/10439948/7d3a07ebeadc/41598_2023_40654_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of typical Thai and Hungarian personality profiles using the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire.使用 Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷比较典型的泰国人和匈牙利人人格特征。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 19;13(1):13508. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40654-z.
2
Multicultural Validation of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire Shortened Form (ZKA-PQ/SF) Across 18 Countries.《祖克曼-库尔曼-阿卢亚人格问卷简版(ZKA-PQ/SF)在18个国家的多元文化验证》
Assessment. 2020 Jun;27(4):728-748. doi: 10.1177/1073191119831770. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
3
Relationship between Personality Traits and the Inner Strengths.人格特质与内在力量的关系。
Psychiatr Danub. 2021 Spring-Summer;33(Suppl 4):844-849.
4
Catalan and Hungarian validation of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ).加泰罗尼亚语和匈牙利语版 Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷(ZKA-PQ)的验证。
Span J Psychol. 2014;17:E24. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2014.25.
5
Person-oriented Approach in Examining Chinese-Hungarian Personality and Affective Disorder Profiles.从以人为本的角度考察中匈人格和情感障碍特征。
Psychiatr Danub. 2021 Spring-Summer;33(Suppl 4):546-551.
6
Development of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ): a factor/facet version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ).《Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷(ZKA-PQ)的编制:Zuckerman-Kuhlman 人格问卷(ZKPQ)的因子/方面版本》。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Sep;92(5):416-31. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.497406.
7
Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ) and Cloninger's Temperament and Character Inventory Revised (TCI-R): a comparative study.祖克曼-库尔曼-阿卢亚人格问卷 (ZKA-PQ) 和克隆宁格气质与性格量表修订版 (TCI-R):一项比较研究。
Scand J Psychol. 2012 Jun;53(3):247-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00943.x. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
8
Short form of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire: Its trait and facet relationships with personality disorder functioning styles in Chinese general and clinical samples.《Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷短式简表中文版:在中国一般人群和临床样本中与人格障碍功能紊乱模式的特质和因子关系》
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Jan;271:438-445. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.028. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
9
Structural analysis of the facets and domains of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ) and the NEO PI-R.对 Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷(ZKA-PQ)和 NEO PI-R 的面和域进行结构分析。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(2):156-63. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.645935.
10
Zuckerman's revised alternative five-factor model: validation of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire in four French-speaking countries.祖克曼修正的五因素人格模型:祖克曼-库尔曼-阿卢亚人格问卷在四个法语国家的验证。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(4):358-65. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.657024. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The psychometric properties of the Thai version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja personality questionnaire.祖克曼-库尔曼-阿卢亚人格问卷泰语版的心理测量特性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):2511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85824-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological predictors of risky driving: the role of age, gender, personality traits (Zuckerman's and Gray's models), and decision-making styles.危险驾驶的心理预测因素:年龄、性别、人格特质(朱克曼和格雷模型)及决策风格的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 18;14:1058927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1058927. eCollection 2023.
2
Temperament & Character account for brain functional connectivity at rest: A diathesis-stress model of functional dysregulation in psychosis.气质与性格决定静息状态下的大脑功能连接:精神分裂症功能失调的素质-应激模型。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;28(6):2238-2253. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02039-6. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
3
Effect of childhood maltreatment on cognitive function and its relationship with personality development and social coping style in major depression disorder patients: A latent class model and network analysis.
童年期虐待对重度抑郁症患者认知功能的影响及其与人格发展和社会应对方式的关系:一项潜在类别模型和网络分析
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 20;14:748857. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.748857. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test.比较网络结构的三个方面:置换检验。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Dec;28(6):1273-1285. doi: 10.1037/met0000476. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
5
Dopaminergic Genetic Variation in Young Adolescents: Associations with Sensation-Seeking.青少年早期的多巴胺能基因变异:与寻求刺激的关联。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2021 Oct;49(10):1259-1274. doi: 10.1007/s10802-021-00823-y. Epub 2021 May 8.
6
Revitalizing the typological approach: Some methods for finding types.振兴类型学方法:一些寻找类型的方法。
J Pers Oriented Res. 2017 Nov 1;3(1):49-62. doi: 10.17505/jpor.2017.04. eCollection 2017.
7
Development and validation of a screening instrument for borderline personality disorder (SI-Bord) for use among university students.大学生边缘型人格障碍筛查工具(SI-Bord)的编制与验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 17;20(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02807-6.
8
The complex genetics and biology of human temperament: a review of traditional concepts in relation to new molecular findings.人类气质的复杂遗传学和生物学:传统概念与新分子发现的关系综述。
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 11;9(1):290. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0621-4.
9
Associations between experimental substance use, FAAH-gene variations, impulsivity and sensation seeking.实验性物质使用、FAAH 基因变异、冲动性和感觉寻求之间的关联。
Psicothema. 2019 Aug;31(3):239-245. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.27.
10
Short form of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire: Its trait and facet relationships with personality disorder functioning styles in Chinese general and clinical samples.《Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja 人格问卷短式简表中文版:在中国一般人群和临床样本中与人格障碍功能紊乱模式的特质和因子关系》
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Jan;271:438-445. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.028. Epub 2018 Dec 6.