• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与消费者合作,共同设计一个以人为中心的定性患者体验数据编码框架。

Partnering with consumers to co-design a person-centred coding framework for qualitative patient experience data.

机构信息

School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Allied Health Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia.

Safety and Implementation Service, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia; Champion Health Agency, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Nov;116:107938. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107938. Epub 2023 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2023.107938
PMID:37598583
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) provide health organisations insight into how 'person-centric' care is. Qualitative data in PREMs surveys provide essential context about experience but are challenging to analyse at an organisational level.

OBJECTIVE

To co-design a person-centred coding framework to assist in the analysis of qualitative PREMs data.

PATIENT INVOLVEMENT

Consumer representatives were involved in problem identification, co-design, coding of raw data (testing), evaluation and manuscript authorship.

METHODOLOGY

Co-design principles guided production of a deductive coding framework with Picker Principles of Person-Centred Care as a conceptual framework. The framework was co-designed over 4 stages, with cross-professional stakeholders (including two consumer representatives): 1) assessment of current state and understanding priorities; 2) adapting Picker Principles of Person-Centred Care as a coding framework; 3) testing and evaluation of a coding template over two quality improvement (QI) cycles against measures of inter-coder reliability and perceived usefulness; 4) endorsement and planning for implementation.

RESULTS

The Picker Principles were a suitable coding framework for inpatient PREMs data, and a coding template in an electronic spreadsheet met end-user needs. Results of the first QI cycle indicated a need for 'less academic' domain names and definitions, which were reviewed and updated to a first-person perspective in partnership with a consumer representative. Inter-coder reliability measures and qualitative feedback improved after cycle two testing and evaluation.

DISCUSSION

This single site study produced a feasible solution to apply person-centred principles to analyse PREMs data and requires testing in different settings. Cross-disciplinary partnerships enabled the development of a reliable and acceptable deductive coding framework that was usable for people without prior experience in qualitative data analysis.

PRACTICAL VALUE

Our solution offers an example for health services to harness the value of qualitative PREMs data and partner with consumers to take person-centric action to improve the safety, equity, and experience of healthcare.

摘要

背景

患者报告的体验衡量指标(PREMs)为医疗机构提供了有关“以患者为中心”的护理的深入了解。PREMs 调查中的定性数据提供了有关体验的重要背景信息,但在组织层面上进行分析具有挑战性。

目的

共同设计一个以患者为中心的编码框架,以协助分析定性 PREMs 数据。

患者参与

消费者代表参与了问题识别、共同设计、原始数据(测试)编码、评估和手稿撰写。

方法

共同设计原则指导了一个演绎编码框架的制作,该框架以关怀照护的皮克原则(Picker Principles of Person-Centred Care)为概念框架。该框架经过四个阶段共同设计,涉及跨专业利益相关者(包括两名消费者代表):1)评估当前状况和理解优先事项;2)将关怀照护的皮克原则改编为编码框架;3)在两个质量改进(QI)周期中,使用编码模板对两个质量改进(QI)周期进行测试和评估,以衡量编码者之间的可靠性和感知有用性;4)认可和实施计划。

结果

关怀照护的皮克原则是住院 PREMs 数据的合适编码框架,电子表格中的编码模板满足了最终用户的需求。第一个 QI 周期的结果表明需要“不那么学术”的领域名称和定义,这些名称和定义在与消费者代表合作的基础上进行了审查和更新,以第一人称视角呈现。经过第二周期的测试和评估,编码者之间的可靠性衡量标准和定性反馈得到了改善。

讨论

这项单站点研究提出了一种可行的解决方案,可将以人为本的原则应用于分析 PREMs 数据,并需要在不同环境中进行测试。跨学科合作使我们能够开发出一种可靠且可接受的演绎编码框架,即使对于没有定性数据分析经验的人来说也具有可操作性。

实用价值

我们的解决方案为卫生服务机构提供了一个范例,使其能够利用定性 PREMs 数据的价值,并与消费者合作,采取以人为本的行动,提高医疗保健的安全性、公平性和体验。

相似文献

1
Partnering with consumers to co-design a person-centred coding framework for qualitative patient experience data.与消费者合作,共同设计一个以人为中心的定性患者体验数据编码框架。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Nov;116:107938. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107938. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
2
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
Women and opioid use disorder treatment: A scoping review of experiences, use of patient-reported experience measures, and integration of person-centred care principles.女性与阿片类药物使用障碍治疗:对经验、患者报告体验测量的使用以及以人为本的关怀原则整合的范围综述。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Aug;130:104520. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104520. Epub 2024 Jul 13.
5
Co-designing person-centred quality indicator implementation for primary care in Alberta: a consensus study.共同设计艾伯塔省初级保健中以患者为中心的质量指标实施方案:一项共识研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 8;8(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00397-z.
6
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
7
Assessing the experience of person-centred coordinated care of people with chronic conditions in the Netherlands: Validation of the Dutch P3CEQ.评估荷兰慢性病患者以人为主导的协同护理体验:荷兰 P3CEQ 的验证。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):1069-1080. doi: 10.1111/hex.13454. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
8
Artificial intelligence after the bedside: co-design of AI-based clinical informatics workflows to routinely analyse patient-reported experience measures in hospitals.床边之后的人工智能:基于人工智能的临床信息工作流程的共同设计,用于常规分析医院中患者报告的体验指标。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Dec 9;31(1):e101124. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101124.
9
Measuring patient experiences of person-centred care: Translation, cultural adaption and qualitative evaluation of item candidates for use in England and Sweden.测量患者对以患者为中心的护理的体验:在英格兰和瑞典使用的项目候选者的翻译、文化适应和定性评估。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2022 Mar;36(1):235-244. doi: 10.1111/scs.12982. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
Australian private healthcare staff perspectives on patient reported experience measures (PREMs): a qualitative interview study.澳大利亚私立医疗机构员工对患者报告体验测量(PReMs)的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Nov 6;8(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00809-6.