• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支架扩张指数对左主干支架置入后支架失败的影响。

Impact of Stent Expansion Index on Stent Failure After Left Main Stenting.

机构信息

Department of interventional cardiology, Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

Department of interventional cardiology, Interventional Cardiology Unit, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 15;205:164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.157. Epub 2023 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.157
PMID:37598602
Abstract

Impact of the stent expansion index (EXPI) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions (ULMD) has been not completely understood especially in current-generation drug-eluting stent (cDES) era. We evaluated the impact of EXPI on clinical outcomes after PCI with cDES for ULMD. We identified 342 patients treated with cDES for ULMD and postintervention intravascular ultrasound between January 2010 and December 2019. In this study, the ratio of minimum stent area (MSA) to reference vessel area at the MSA site was adopted to assess the stent expansion. We defined the patients with the first and second tertile as low-intermediate EXPI group and those with the third tertile as high EXPI group and compared the clinical outcomes between both groups. The primary end point was target lesion failure (TLF). TLF was defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR) ,and myocardial infarction. The MSA was located in the ostium of left anterior descending coronary artery in most cases (318 of 342 patients; 93.0%). There were no significant differences between both groups in the baseline clinical, lesion, and procedural characteristics. The high EXPI group had lower TLF rate than the low-intermediate EXPI group (10.2% vs 19.9%, log-rank p = 0.033). In conclusion, this is the first report that the higher ratio of MSA to reference vessel area at the MSA site, which was defined as stent EXPI, was associated with more favorable clinical outcomes after PCI for ULMD.

摘要

支架膨胀指数(EXPI)在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗无保护左主干远端分叉病变(ULMD)中的作用尚不完全清楚,尤其是在当前代药物洗脱支架(cDES)时代。我们评估了在 ULMD 患者中使用 cDES 进行 PCI 后 EXPI 对临床结果的影响。我们纳入了 2010 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受 cDES 治疗 ULMD 并在术后进行血管内超声检查的 342 例患者。在本研究中,采用最小支架面积(MSA)与 MSA 部位参考血管面积的比值来评估支架膨胀程度。我们将 MSA 部位的最小支架面积(MSA)与参考血管面积的比值定义为低-中 EXPI 组和高 EXPI 组,比较两组患者的临床结果。主要终点是靶病变失败(TLF)。TLF 定义为心脏死亡、靶病变血运重建(TLR)和心肌梗死的复合终点。MSA 位于左前降支开口的情况最为常见(342 例患者中有 318 例,93.0%)。两组患者的基线临床、病变和手术特征均无显著差异。高 EXPI 组的 TLF 发生率低于低-中 EXPI 组(10.2% vs 19.9%,log-rank p=0.033)。总之,这是第一项表明支架扩张指数(支架 EXPI)越高,即 MSA 与 MSA 部位参考血管面积的比值越高,与 ULMD 患者 PCI 后更有利的临床结果相关的研究。

相似文献

1
Impact of Stent Expansion Index on Stent Failure After Left Main Stenting.支架扩张指数对左主干支架置入后支架失败的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Oct 15;205:164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.07.157. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
2
Clinical outcomes of double stent strategy for unprotected left main distal bifurcation lesions using current generation drug eluting stent comparing to early generation drug eluting stent; The Milan and New Tokyo (MITO) registry.采用新一代药物洗脱支架与早期药物洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干远端分叉病变的双支架策略的临床结果:米兰和新东京(MITO)注册研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 1;97(2):E198-E208. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28962. Epub 2020 May 8.
3
Target Lesion Revascularization After Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.血管内超声指导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的靶病变血运重建。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 May;16(5):e012922. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.012922. Epub 2023 May 16.
4
The impact of chronic kidney disease severity on clinical outcomes after current generation drug-eluting stent implantation for left main distal bifurcation lesions: the Milan and New-Tokyo registry.当代药物洗脱支架治疗左主干远端分叉病变后慢性肾脏病严重程度对临床结局的影响:米兰和新东京注册研究。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2022 Dec;56(1):236-242. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2022.2084561.
5
Prognostic Impact of Target Lesion Revascularization on Long-Term Cardiac Mortality After Current-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main Distal Bifurcation: the Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) Registry.当代药物洗脱支架植入治疗左主干远端分叉病变后,靶病变血运重建对长期心脏死亡率的预后影响:米兰和新东京(MITO)注册研究。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Apr;49:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.11.007. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
6
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
7
Stent Expansion Indexes to Predict Clinical Outcomes: An IVUS Substudy From ADAPT-DES.支架扩张指数预测临床结局:来自 ADAPT-DES 的血管内超声亚研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 9;14(15):1639-1650. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.05.019.
8
Comparison of simple versus complex stenting in patients with true distal left main bifurcation lesions.真左主干分叉病变患者单纯支架术与复杂支架术的对比。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 1;97(5):776-785. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29219. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
9
Clinical impact of bifurcation angle change between diastole and systole in complex stenting for left main distal bifurcation: The Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) Registry.左主干远端分叉病变复杂支架置入术中舒张期和收缩期分叉角度变化的临床影响:米兰和新东京(MITO)注册研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 1;98(1):E24-E34. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29431. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
10
Clinical Outcomes After Current-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Ostial Left Circumflex Lesions.经新一代药物洗脱支架植入治疗开口左回旋支病变的临床结局。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jul;40:57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Stent Crumpling as a Complication of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, a Case Report and Literature Review.支架皱缩作为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的一种并发症:一例报告及文献综述
Clin Case Rep. 2025 Feb 10;13(2):e70212. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.70212. eCollection 2025 Feb.