Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA; Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cortex. 2023 Oct;167:335-350. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.012. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
The ability to select between potential actions is central to the complex process of tool use. After left hemisphere stroke, individuals with limb apraxia make more hand action errors when gesturing the use of tools with conflicting hand actions for grasping-to-move and use (e.g., screwdriver) relative to tools that are grasped-to-move and used with the same hand action (e.g., hammer). Prior research indicates that this grasp-use interference effect is driven by abnormalities in the competitive action selection process. The goal of this project was to determine whether common mechanisms and neural substrates support the competitive selection of task-appropriate responses in both tool and non-tool domains. If so, the grasp-use interference effect in a tool use gesturing task should be correlated with response interference effects in the classic Eriksen flanker and Simon tasks, and at least partly overlapping neural regions should subserve the 3 tasks. Sixty-four left hemisphere stroke survivors (33 with apraxia) participated in the tool- and non-tool interference tasks and underwent T1 anatomical MRI. There were robust grasp-use interference effects (grasp-use conflict test) and response interference effects (Eriksen flanker and Simon tasks), but these effects were not correlated. Lesion-symptom mapping analyses showed that lesions to the left inferior parietal lobule, ventral premotor cortex, and insula were associated with grasp-use interference. Lesions to the left inferior parietal lobule, postcentral gyrus, insula, caudate, and putamen were associated with response interference in the Eriksen flanker task. Lesions to the left caudate and putamen were also associated with response interference in the Simon task. Our results suggest that the selection of hand posture for tool use is mediated by distinct cognitive mechanisms and partly distinct neuroanatomic substrates from those mapping a stimulus to an appropriate motor response in non-tool domains.
选择潜在动作的能力是工具使用这一复杂过程的核心。在左半球中风后,患有肢体失用症的个体在比划工具的使用方式时,会做出更多手部动作错误,这些工具的抓握动作与移动(例如螺丝刀)相冲突,而不是与相同的手部动作(例如锤子)相冲突。先前的研究表明,这种抓握-使用干扰效应是由竞争动作选择过程中的异常引起的。本项目的目标是确定在工具和非工具领域中,是否有共同的机制和神经基质来支持任务适当反应的竞争选择。如果是这样,那么在工具使用比划任务中的抓握-使用干扰效应应该与经典的 E 型干扰任务和 Simon 任务中的反应干扰效应相关,并且至少部分重叠的神经区域应该服务于这 3 个任务。64 名左半球中风幸存者(33 名患有失用症)参与了工具和非工具干扰任务,并接受了 T1 解剖 MRI 检查。有明显的抓握-使用干扰效应(抓握-使用冲突测试)和反应干扰效应(E 型干扰任务和 Simon 任务),但这些效应没有相关性。病变-症状映射分析表明,左侧顶下小叶、腹侧运动前皮质和岛叶的病变与抓握-使用干扰有关。左侧顶下小叶、中央后回、岛叶、尾状核和壳核的病变与 E 型干扰任务中的反应干扰有关。左侧尾状核和壳核的病变也与 Simon 任务中的反应干扰有关。我们的结果表明,工具使用中手姿的选择是由不同的认知机制介导的,部分与非工具领域中映射刺激到适当运动反应的神经解剖学基础不同。