Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Karada care Business Promotion Office, NEC Livex Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024;37(1):3-12. doi: 10.3233/BMR-220291.
Knee pain is the main symptom of knee osteoarthritis. Walking is effective against knee pain, and some studies have shown that gait modification can also relieve this condition. However, the quality of evidence for the clinically significant effects of gait modification on knee pain has not been examined.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the level of evidence for the clinically significant effects of gait modification on knee pain and determine if the effects are greater than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).
We comprehensively searched electronic databases such as MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Intervention studies with experimental groups who received gait modification and control groups who did not were evaluated. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the level of evidence.
Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. All were included in the systematic review and two in the meta-analysis. Results showed that gait modification have significant effects (p= 0.02), and the quality of evidence was very low. However, several studies have revealed that the effects of gait modification, when used as a foot-focused intervention, were greater than the MCID.
We concluded that there is a lack of high-quality evidence that supports the general efficacy of gait modification. Although based on low-quality evidence, when applied to the foot, it may have clinically significant effects.
膝关节疼痛是膝骨关节炎的主要症状。行走对膝关节疼痛有治疗作用,一些研究表明,步态改变也可以缓解这种情况。然而,步态改变对膝关节疼痛的临床显著效果的证据质量尚未得到检验。
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估步态改变对膝关节疼痛的临床显著效果的证据水平,并确定其效果是否大于最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
我们全面检索了 MEDLINE、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、物理治疗证据数据库和护理与联合健康文献累积索引等电子数据库。评估了实验组接受步态改变和对照组未接受步态改变的干预研究。使用推荐评估、制定和评估系统(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system)评估证据水平。
符合纳入标准的研究有 9 项。所有研究均纳入系统评价,其中 2 项纳入荟萃分析。结果表明,步态改变具有显著效果(p=0.02),证据质量为极低。然而,有几项研究表明,步态改变作为足部焦点干预的效果大于 MCID。
我们得出结论,缺乏支持步态改变一般疗效的高质量证据。尽管基于低质量证据,但当应用于足部时,它可能具有临床显著效果。