• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接种科兴和阿斯利康第二剂疫苗后的抗SARS-CoV-2受体结合域抗体。

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain antibodies after the second dose of Sinovac and AstraZeneca vaccination.

作者信息

Gondokesumo Marisca Evalina, Purnamayanti Anita, Hanum Puri Safitri, Santosa Winnie Nirmala, Wardhana Ardyan Prima, Avanti Christina

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia.

出版信息

Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2023 Jul;12(3):224-231. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2023.12.3.224. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

DOI:10.7774/cevr.2023.12.3.224
PMID:37599805
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10435773/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Sinovac and AstraZeneca vaccines are the primary coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines in Indonesia. Antibody levels in vaccine-injected individuals will decline substantially over time, but data supporting the duration of such responses are limited. Therefore, this study aims to quantitatively evaluate antibody responses resulting from the completion of Sinovac and AstraZeneca administration in Indonesian adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants were divided into two groups based on their vaccine type. Both groups were then assessed on the anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) receptor binding domain (anti-SRBD) concentrations. The anti-SRBD level was measured using Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S assay and analyzed every month until 3 months after the second vaccination.

RESULTS

The results presented significant differences (p=0.000) in immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers among the vaccines' measurement duration, where all samples observed a decrease in IgG titers over time. The mean titer levels of anti-SRBD IgG in the group given Sinovac were high in the first month after vaccination and decreased by 55.7% in 3 months. AstraZeneca showed lesser immune response with a slower decline rate. Adverse effects following immunization (AEFI) showed that systemic reactions are the most reported in both vaccines, with a higher percentage in the second dose of AstraZeneca type vaccines.

CONCLUSION

Sinovac induced more significant titers of anti-SRBD IgG 1 month after the second dose but generated fewer AEFIs. In contrast, AstraZeneca generated more AEFIs, in mild to moderate severity, but provided lower levels of anti-SRBD IgG.

摘要

目的

科兴疫苗和阿斯利康疫苗是印度尼西亚主要的2019冠状病毒病疫苗。接种疫苗个体的抗体水平会随着时间大幅下降,但支持这种反应持续时间的数据有限。因此,本研究旨在定量评估印度尼西亚成年人完成科兴疫苗和阿斯利康疫苗接种后的抗体反应。

材料与方法

参与者根据疫苗类型分为两组。然后对两组的抗严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)受体结合域(抗-SRBD)浓度进行评估。使用罗氏电化学发光法抗SARS-CoV-2 S检测法测量抗-SRBD水平,并每月进行分析,直至第二次接种后3个月。

结果

结果显示,在疫苗的测量期间,免疫球蛋白G(IgG)滴度存在显著差异(p=0.000),所有样本的IgG滴度均随时间下降。接种科兴疫苗组的抗-SRBD IgG平均滴度水平在接种后第一个月较高,3个月内下降了55.7%。阿斯利康疫苗的免疫反应较弱,下降速度较慢。免疫接种后不良反应(AEFI)显示,两种疫苗中最常报告的是全身反应,阿斯利康疫苗第二剂的报告比例更高。

结论

科兴疫苗在第二剂接种后1个月诱导产生的抗-SRBD IgG滴度更显著,但产生的免疫接种后不良反应较少。相比之下,阿斯利康疫苗产生的免疫接种后不良反应更多,程度为轻度至中度,但抗-SRBD IgG水平较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a6d/10435773/49cde81b9ce9/cevr-12-224-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a6d/10435773/b0a8d0b2af97/cevr-12-224-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a6d/10435773/5abd0aea73b4/cevr-12-224-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a6d/10435773/49cde81b9ce9/cevr-12-224-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a6d/10435773/b0a8d0b2af97/cevr-12-224-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a6d/10435773/5abd0aea73b4/cevr-12-224-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a6d/10435773/49cde81b9ce9/cevr-12-224-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain antibodies after the second dose of Sinovac and AstraZeneca vaccination.接种科兴和阿斯利康第二剂疫苗后的抗SARS-CoV-2受体结合域抗体。
Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2023 Jul;12(3):224-231. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2023.12.3.224. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
[Humoral Immune Response in Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine: When Should a Booster Dose be Administered?].[灭活新型冠状病毒疫苗的体液免疫反应:何时应接种加强针?]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Jul;56(3):566-573. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229715.
3
Real-world serological responses to extended-interval and heterologous COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in frail, older people (UNCoVER): an interim report from a prospective observational cohort study.真实世界中衰弱老年人接受延长间隔和异源 COVID-19 mRNA 疫苗接种后的血清学反应(UNCoVER):一项前瞻性观察队列研究的中期报告。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Mar;3(3):e166-e175. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00012-5. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
Comparison of the effectiveness and duration of anti-RBD SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response between different types of vaccines: Implications for vaccine strategies.不同类型疫苗的抗 SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG 抗体反应的有效性和持续时间比较:对疫苗策略的影响。
Vaccine. 2022 May 3;40(20):2841-2847. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.03.069. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
5
Titer disparity of anti-Spike receptor binding domain SARS-CoV-2 antibody between vaccinated and naturally infected individuals.接种疫苗个体与自然感染个体之间抗严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)刺突受体结合域抗体的滴度差异。
Narra J. 2022 Apr;2(1):e71. doi: 10.52225/narra.v2i1.71. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
6
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies Post-COVID-19 or Post-Vaccination in Libyan Population: Comparison of Four Vaccines.利比亚人群中新冠康复后或接种疫苗后抗SARS-CoV-2 IgG抗体:四种疫苗的比较
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 24;10(12):2002. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10122002.
7
The role of COVID-19 survivor status and gender towards neutralizing antibody titers 1, 2, 3 months after Sinovac vaccine administration on clinical-year medical students in Indonesia.新型冠状病毒肺炎幸存者状态和性别对印度尼西亚临床医学生接种科兴疫苗后 1、2、3 个月中和抗体滴度的影响。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;113:336-338. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.009. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (inactivated, Vero cell): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗(灭活,Vero 细胞)有效性和安全性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 III 期临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 13;22(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05180-1.
9
Safety and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 ARCoV mRNA vaccine in Chinese adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial.新型冠状病毒 ARCoV mRNA 疫苗在中国成年人中的安全性和免疫原性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、1 期临床试验。
Lancet Microbe. 2022 Mar;3(3):e193-e202. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00280-9. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
10
[The Second Shot of CoronaVac Vaccine May Cause Reduction of Antibody Levels in People who Previously had COVID-19].科兴新冠疫苗第二针可能导致曾感染新冠病毒者抗体水平下降
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Jan;56(1):139-142. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229913.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunogenicity and Safety of SARS-CoV-2 Protein Subunit Recombinant Vaccine (IndoVac) as a Heterologous Booster Dose against COVID-19 in Indonesian Adolescents.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)蛋白亚单位重组疫苗(IndoVac)作为印度尼西亚青少年COVID-19异源加强剂量的免疫原性和安全性
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;12(8):938. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12080938.
2
The presumed protective effect of IVIG against SARS-CoV-2 in inflammatory myopathy patients remains questionable.静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)对炎性肌病患者预防新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)的假定保护作用仍存在疑问。
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Feb;44(2):397-398. doi: 10.1007/s00296-023-05472-6. Epub 2023 Sep 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Anti-Spike (RDB) IgG Titer among Workers Employed at the University of Pisa Vaccinated with Different Types of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines.对比接种不同类型SARS-CoV-2疫苗的比萨大学工作人员的抗刺突(RBD)IgG滴度
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Aug 3;10(8):1244. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081244.
2
Heterologous prime-boost with the mRNA-1273 vaccine among CoronaVac-vaccinated healthcare workers in Indonesia.印度尼西亚接种科兴疫苗的医护人员中采用mRNA-1273疫苗进行异源初免-加强免疫。
Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2022 May;11(2):209-216. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2022.11.2.209. Epub 2022 May 31.
3
Association of Impaired Fasting Glucose and Diabetes with SARS-CoV-2 Spike Antibody Titers after the BNT162b2 Vaccine among Health Care Workers in a Tertiary Hospital in Japan.
日本一家三级医院医护人员接种BNT162b2疫苗后空腹血糖受损和糖尿病与新冠病毒刺突抗体滴度的关联
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 May 13;10(5):776. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10050776.
4
Immunogenicity and Safety of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines in a Cohort of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病患者队列中SARS-CoV-2 mRNA疫苗的免疫原性和安全性
Diabetes. 2022 Aug 1;71(8):1800-1806. doi: 10.2337/db22-0053.
5
Comparison of safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 against the SARS-CoV-2 circulating variants of concern (Alpha, Delta, Beta) in Thai healthcare workers.在泰国医护人员中比较科兴疫苗(CoronaVac)和牛津-阿斯利康疫苗(ChAdOx1)针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)关注的循环变异株(阿尔法、德尔塔、贝塔)的安全性和免疫原性。
Vaccine X. 2022 Mar 5;10:100153. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100153. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Safety and immunogenicity of heterologous and homologous inactivated and adenoviral-vectored COVID-19 vaccine regimens in healthy adults: a prospective cohort study.健康成年人中使用异源和同源灭活及腺病毒载体 COVID-19 疫苗方案的安全性和免疫原性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):2029111. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2029111. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
7
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike receptor binding domain IgG antibody responses after CoronaVac, BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 COVID-19 vaccines, and a single booster dose: a prospective, longitudinal population-based study.科兴新冠疫苗、辉瑞疫苗、腺病毒载体新冠疫苗加强免疫后针对新冠病毒刺突受体结合域 IgG 抗体应答的比较:一项前瞻性、纵向基于人群的研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2022 Apr;3(4):e274-e283. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00305-0. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
8
Factors Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Titer After Sinovac Vaccination Among Health Care Workers.科兴疫苗接种后医护人员体内 SARS-CoV-2 抗体滴度相关因素。
Acta Med Indones. 2021 Oct;53(4):374-384.
9
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein RBD Antibody Levels After Receiving a Second Dose of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (AZD1222) Vaccine in Healthcare Workers: Lack of Association With Age, Sex, Obesity, and Adverse Reactions.接受第二剂 ChAdOx1 nCov-19(AZD1222)疫苗后医护人员体内的抗 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白 RBD 抗体水平:与年龄、性别、肥胖和不良反应无关。
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 25;12:779212. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.779212. eCollection 2021.
10
Analysis of long-term antibody response in COVID-19 patients by symptoms grade, gender, age, BMI, and medication.分析症状严重程度、性别、年龄、BMI 和用药对 COVID-19 患者长期抗体应答的影响。
J Med Virol. 2022 Apr;94(4):1412-1418. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27452. Epub 2021 Nov 18.