Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Changsha Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Changsha Eighth Hospital), Changsha, Hunan, 410000, People's Republic of China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410011, People's Republic of China.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Aug 15;18:1741-1751. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S417566. eCollection 2023.
We analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes in non-frequent exacerbation patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled patients with stable COPD from 12 hospitals. Non-frequent exacerbation was defined as less than two times of exacerbations in the past year. The non-frequent exacerbation patients were classified into less and more symptomatic groups based on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC). Finally, the non-frequent exacerbation patients with less and more symptomatic were classified into the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)+inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), LABA+LAMA, and LABA+LAMA+ICS groups. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as a CAT score decrease of ≥ 2 during six months of follow-up. We recorded the number of exacerbations and mortality during one year of follow-up.
A total of 834 (67.5%) non-frequent exacerbation patients with COPD were included in this study. The non-frequent exacerbation patients had a higher education level and body mass index (BMI), and lower CAT and mMRC scores (<0.05). In addition, the non-frequent exacerbation patients had lower mortality and risk of future exacerbation, and were more likely to attain MCID (<0.05). Furthermore, the non-frequent exacerbation patients with more symptomatic COPD treated with LABA+LAMA or LABA+LAMA+ICS were more likely to attain MCID and had a lower risk of future exacerbation (<0.05). However, there were no significant differences among the different inhalation therapies in non-frequent exacerbation patients with less symptomatic COPD.
The non-frequent exacerbation patients with COPD had a higher education level and BMI, a lower symptom burden, and better outcomes. In addition, LABA+LAMA should be recommended to non-frequent exacerbation patients with more symptomatic COPD, while mono-LAMA should be recommended to non-frequent exacerbation patients with less symptomatic COPD as the initial inhalation therapy.
我们分析了慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)非频繁加重患者的临床特征和结局。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们从 12 家医院招募了稳定期 COPD 患者。非频繁加重定义为过去一年中加重次数少于两次。根据 COPD 评估测试(CAT)和改良的医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难量表,将非频繁加重患者分为症状较轻和症状较重两组。最后,将症状较轻和症状较重的非频繁加重 COPD 患者分为长效抗胆碱能药物(LAMA)、长效β2-受体激动剂(LABA)+吸入性皮质激素(ICS)、LABA+LAMA、LABA+LAMA+ICS 组。最小临床重要差异(MCID)定义为随访 6 个月时 CAT 评分下降≥2。我们记录了 1 年随访期间的加重次数和死亡率。
共纳入 834 例(67.5%)非频繁加重 COPD 患者。与频繁加重患者相比,非频繁加重患者的受教育程度和体重指数更高,CAT 和 mMRC 评分更低(<0.05)。此外,非频繁加重患者的死亡率和未来加重风险较低,更有可能达到 MCID(<0.05)。此外,与 LABA+LAMA 或 LABA+LAMA+ICS 治疗相比,症状较重的非频繁加重 COPD 患者更有可能达到 MCID,且未来加重风险较低(<0.05)。然而,在症状较轻的非频繁加重 COPD 患者中,不同吸入治疗方案之间没有显著差异。
COPD 非频繁加重患者受教育程度和体重指数较高,症状负担较低,结局较好。此外,对于症状较重的非频繁加重 COPD 患者,建议使用 LABA+LAMA,而对于症状较轻的非频繁加重 COPD 患者,建议使用 LAMA 作为初始吸入治疗。