Suppr超能文献

不同吸入疗法对中国人群中症状较轻的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的影响:一项真实世界研究。

The effects of different inhalation therapies on less symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in a Chinese population: a real-world study.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

Research Unit of Respiratory Disease, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Ann Med. 2023 Dec;55(1):1317-1324. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2192519.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) document suggests that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should be divided into a less symptomatic group. Moreover, single-inhaled drugs are recommended as initial inhalation therapy for them. However, many less symptomatic patients are provided double or triple-inhaled drugs as initial therapy in the real world. This study aimed to describe the inhalation prescriptions and compare the effects of different inhalation therapies on less symptomatic COPD patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an observational study. Stable COPD patients were recruited and divided into a less symptomatic group including Groups A and C based on the GOLD 2019 document. We collected the data of inhalation therapies prescriptions. Then, the patients were classified into long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) + inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), LABA + LAMA, and LABA + LAMA + ICS groups. All the patients were followed up for 1 year to collect exacerbation and mortality data.

RESULTS

We found that only 45.4% of patients in Group A and 43.6% of patients in Group C received reasonable inhalation therapy in reference to the GOLD document. In addition, the LAMA group had a higher forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1%pred, FEV1/forced vital capacity and peak expiratory flow compared with LABA + ICS, LABA + LAMA and LABA + LAMA + ICS groups. However, we did not find any significant differences of exacerbation, hospitalization and mortality during the follow-up among different inhalation therapies groups on less symptomatic COPD patients.

CONCLUSION

Over half of the less symptomatic patients received inhalation therapy that were inconsistent with the GOLD document recommendations in a Chinese population in the real world. In fact, the single inhaled drug of LAMA should be recommended and pulmonary function is not a good indicator for the choice of initial inhalation therapy in less symptomatic COPD patients.KEY MESSAGESOver half of the less symptomatic COPD patients received inhalation therapy that were inconsistent with the GOLD document recommendations in a Chinese population in the real world.The clinicians should offer a single inhaled drug of LAMA to less symptomatic COPD patients and pulmonary function is not a good indicator for the choice of initial inhalation therapy.

摘要

背景

全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD)文件建议将慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者分为症状较轻的一组。此外,建议为他们使用单吸入药物作为初始吸入治疗。然而,在现实世界中,许多症状较轻的患者接受的初始治疗是双或三联吸入药物。本研究旨在描述吸入处方,并比较不同吸入疗法对症状较轻的 COPD 患者的疗效。

患者和方法

这是一项观察性研究。招募稳定的 COPD 患者,并根据 GOLD 2019 文献将其分为症状较轻的组,包括 A 组和 C 组。我们收集了吸入疗法处方的数据。然后,将患者分为长效抗胆碱能药物(LAMA)、长效β2-激动剂(LABA)+吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)、LABA+LAMA 和 LABA+LAMA+ICS 组。所有患者均随访 1 年,以收集加重和死亡数据。

结果

我们发现,仅 A 组 45.4%和 C 组 43.6%的患者接受了符合 GOLD 文件的合理吸入治疗。此外,与 LABA+ICS、LABA+LAMA 和 LABA+LAMA+ICS 组相比,LAMA 组的用力呼气量(FEV1)、FEV1%pred、FEV1/用力肺活量和呼气峰流量更高。然而,我们并未发现不同吸入疗法组的症状较轻的 COPD 患者在随访期间加重、住院和死亡率有显著差异。

结论

在中国人群中,超过一半的症状较轻的患者接受的吸入治疗与 GOLD 文件的建议不一致。实际上,应推荐使用 LAMA 单一吸入药物,而肺功能不是症状较轻的 COPD 患者初始吸入治疗选择的良好指标。

关键信息

在中国人群中,超过一半的症状较轻的 COPD 患者接受的吸入治疗与 GOLD 文件的建议不一致。

临床医生应向症状较轻的 COPD 患者提供 LAMA 单一吸入药物,而肺功能不是初始吸入治疗选择的良好指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a2/10062218/d5907dfbbc7b/IANN_A_2192519_F0001_B.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验