• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大规模健康数据再利用中的动态同意、沟通与结果反馈:公众偏好调查

Dynamic consent, communication and return of results in large-scale health data reuse: Survey of public preferences.

作者信息

Muller Sam Ha, van Thiel Ghislaine Jmw, Mostert Menno, van Delden Johannes Jm

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2023 Aug 16;9:20552076231190997. doi: 10.1177/20552076231190997. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076231190997
PMID:37599899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10434987/
Abstract

Dynamic consent forms a comprehensive, tailored approach for interacting with research participants. We conducted a survey study to inquire how research participants evaluate the elements of consent, information provision, communication and return of results within dynamic consent in a hypothetical health data reuse scenario. We distributed a digital questionnaire among a purposive sample of patient panel members. Data were analysed using descriptive and nonparametric inferential statistics. Respondents favoured the potential to manage changing consent preferences over time. There was much agreement between people favouring closer and more specific control over data reuse approval and those in favour of broader approval, facilitated by an opt-out system or an independent data reuse committee. People want to receive more information about reuse, outcomes and return of results. Respondents supported an interactive model of research participation, welcoming regular, diverse and interactive forms of communication, like a digital communication platform. Approval for reuse and providing meaningful information, including meaningful return of results, are intricately related to facilitating better communication. Respondents favoured return of actionable research results. These findings emphasize the potential of dynamic consent for enabling participants to maintain control over their data are being used for purposes by . Allowing different options to shape a dynamic consent interface in health data reuse in a personalized manner is pivotal to accommodate plurality in a flexible though robust manner. Interaction via dynamic consent enables participants to tailor the elements of participation they deem relevant to their own preferences, engaging diverse perspectives, interests and preferences.

摘要

动态同意构成了一种与研究参与者互动的全面、量身定制的方法。我们进行了一项调查研究,以探究在假设的健康数据再利用场景中,研究参与者如何评估动态同意中的同意要素、信息提供、沟通及结果反馈。我们在一个有目的选取的患者小组成员样本中分发了一份数字问卷。使用描述性和非参数推断统计方法对数据进行了分析。受访者赞成随着时间推移管理不断变化的同意偏好的可能性。在赞成对数据再利用批准进行更严格、更具体控制的人和赞成通过退出系统或独立数据再利用委员会促成的更广泛批准的人之间,存在很多共识。人们希望获得更多关于再利用、结果及结果反馈的信息。受访者支持研究参与的互动模式,欢迎定期、多样且互动的沟通形式,比如数字通信平台。对再利用的批准以及提供有意义的信息,包括有意义的结果反馈,与促进更好的沟通密切相关。受访者赞成反馈可采取行动的研究结果。这些发现强调了动态同意在使参与者能够对其数据用于何种目的保持控制方面的潜力。允许以个性化方式塑造健康数据再利用中动态同意界面的不同选项,对于以灵活而稳健的方式适应多样性至关重要。通过动态同意进行互动,使参与者能够根据自己的偏好调整他们认为与参与相关的要素,从而吸引不同的观点、兴趣和偏好。

相似文献

1
Dynamic consent, communication and return of results in large-scale health data reuse: Survey of public preferences.大规模健康数据再利用中的动态同意、沟通与结果反馈:公众偏好调查
Digit Health. 2023 Aug 16;9:20552076231190997. doi: 10.1177/20552076231190997. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.
3
Ten years of dynamic consent in the CHRIS study: informed consent as a dynamic process.CHRIS 研究中的十年动态同意:知情同意作为一个动态过程。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec;30(12):1391-1397. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01160-4. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
4
Patients' and Publics' Preferences for Data-Intensive Health Research Governance: Survey Study.患者和公众对数据密集型健康研究治理的偏好:调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 7;9(3):e36797. doi: 10.2196/36797.
5
A blank check or a global public good? A qualitative study of how ethics review committee members in Colombia weigh the risks and benefits of broad consent for data and sample sharing during a pandemic.一张空白支票还是一项全球公共利益?关于哥伦比亚伦理审查委员会成员如何权衡大流行期间数据和样本共享广泛同意的风险与益处的定性研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun 6;2(6):e0000364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000364. eCollection 2022.
6
Foundations for Meaningful Consent in Canada's Digital Health Ecosystem: Retrospective Study.加拿大数字健康生态系统中有意义同意的基础:回顾性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Mar 31;10(3):e30986. doi: 10.2196/30986.
7
Citizens, Research Ethics Committee Members and Researchers' Attitude Toward Information and Consent for the Secondary Use of Health Data: Implications for Research Within Learning Health Systems.公民、研究伦理委员会成员和研究人员对健康数据二次使用的信息和同意的态度:对学习型卫生系统内研究的影响。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2021 Jul;16(3):165-178. doi: 10.1177/1556264621992214. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
8
Opt-In and Opt-Out Consent Procedures for the Reuse of Routinely Recorded Health Data in Scientific Research and Their Consequences for Consent Rate and Consent Bias: Systematic Review.知情选择同意和退出同意程序在科研中对常规记录健康数据的再利用及其对同意率和同意偏倚的影响:系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 28;25:e42131. doi: 10.2196/42131.
9
Developing model biobanking consent language: what matters to prospective participants?制定适合生物样本库的知情同意书语言:哪些是潜在参与者关注的?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 15;20(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01001-2.
10
Patients' Willingness to Provide Their Clinical Data for Research Purposes and Acceptance of Different Consent Models: Findings From a Representative Survey of Patients With Cancer.患者愿意为研究目的提供临床数据并接受不同的同意模式:一项基于癌症患者的代表性调查的研究结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 25;24(8):e37665. doi: 10.2196/37665.

引用本文的文献

1
Worldwide willingness to share health data high but privacy, consent and transparency paramount, a meta-analysis.一项荟萃分析表明,全球范围内共享健康数据的意愿很高,但隐私、同意和透明度至关重要。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 23;8(1):540. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01868-9.
2
Building trust in clinical research: a systems approach to ethical engagement and sustainable outcomes.建立临床研究中的信任:一种实现道德参与和可持续成果的系统方法。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 16;16:1570899. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1570899. eCollection 2025.
3
Insights From the Development of a Dynamic Consent Platform for the Australians Together Health Initiative (ATHENA) Program: Interview and Survey Study.澳大利亚团结健康倡议(ATHENA)项目动态知情同意平台开发的启示:访谈和调查研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 6;8:e57165. doi: 10.2196/57165.