Hamadelseed Osama, Chan Mike K S, Wong Michelle B F, Skutella Thomas
Department of Neuroanatomy, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
EW European Wellness Academy GmbH, Edenkoben, Germany.
Front Neurosci. 2023 Aug 3;17:1225228. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1225228. eCollection 2023.
We critically review research findings on the unique changes in brain structure and cognitive function characteristic of Down syndrome (DS) and summarize the similarities and differences with other neurodevelopmental disorders such as Williams syndrome, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, and fragile X syndrome.
We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic literature review of 84 studies identified by searching PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science from 1977 to October 2022. This review focuses on the following issues: (1) specific neuroanatomic and histopathological features of DS as revealed by autopsy and modern neuroimaging modalities, (2) language and memory deficits in DS, (3) the relationships between these neuroanatomical and neuropsychological features, and (4) neuroanatomic and neuropsychological differences between DS and related neurodevelopmental syndromes.
Numerous post-mortem and morphometric neuroimaging investigations of individuals with DS have reported complex changes in regional brain volumes, most notably in the hippocampal formation, temporal lobe, frontal lobe, parietal lobe, and cerebellum. Moreover, neuropsychological assessments have revealed deficits in language development, emotional regulation, and memory that reflect these structural changes and are more severe than expected from general cognitive dysfunction. Individuals with DS also show relative preservation of multiple cognitive, linguistic, and social domains compared to normally developed controls and individuals with other neurodevelopmental disorders. However, all these neurodevelopment disorders exhibit substantial heterogeneity among individuals.
People with Down syndrome demonstrate unique neurodevelopmental abnormalities but cannot be regarded as a homogenous group. A comprehensive evaluation of individual intellectual skills is essential for all individuals with neurodevelopment disorders to develop personalized care programs.
我们批判性地回顾了关于唐氏综合征(DS)独特的脑结构和认知功能变化的研究结果,并总结了与威廉姆斯综合征、22q11.2缺失综合征和脆性X综合征等其他神经发育障碍的异同。
我们对通过检索1977年至2022年10月期间的PubMed、谷歌学术和科学网所确定的84项研究进行了荟萃分析和系统文献综述。本综述聚焦于以下问题:(1)尸检和现代神经影像学方法所揭示的DS的特定神经解剖和组织病理学特征;(2)DS中的语言和记忆缺陷;(3)这些神经解剖和神经心理学特征之间的关系;(4)DS与相关神经发育综合征之间的神经解剖和神经心理学差异。
对DS个体进行的大量死后和形态计量神经影像学研究报告了区域脑容量的复杂变化,最显著的是海马结构、颞叶、额叶、顶叶和小脑。此外,神经心理学评估揭示了语言发展、情绪调节和记忆方面的缺陷,这些缺陷反映了这些结构变化,且比一般认知功能障碍预期的更为严重。与正常发育的对照组和其他神经发育障碍个体相比,DS个体在多个认知、语言和社会领域也表现出相对保留。然而,所有这些神经发育障碍在个体之间都表现出很大的异质性。
唐氏综合征患者表现出独特的神经发育异常,但不能被视为一个同质群体。对所有神经发育障碍个体进行全面的智力技能评估对于制定个性化护理计划至关重要。