Adenoma detection rate . adenoma per colonoscopy as quality indicators for colon cancer screening.
作者信息
Ishtiaq Rizwan, Zulfiqar Laraib, Gangwani Manesh Kumar, Aziz Muhammad
机构信息
Academic Hospitalist, St. Francis Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Department of Medicine, Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
出版信息
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Apr 28;8:24. doi: 10.21037/tgh-22-92. eCollection 2023.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Adenoma detection rate . adenoma per colonoscopy as quality indicators for colon cancer screening.腺瘤检出率。每例结肠镜检查发现的腺瘤作为结肠癌筛查的质量指标。
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Apr 28;8:24. doi: 10.21037/tgh-22-92. eCollection 2023.
2
Comparison of adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy as a quality indicator of colonoscopy.腺瘤检出率及每次结肠镜检查腺瘤数量作为结肠镜检查质量指标的比较
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul;51(7):886-90. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2016.1157892. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
3
Defining Benchmarks for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenomas Per Colonoscopy in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy Due to a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test.确定因粪便免疫化学检测呈阳性而接受结肠镜检查的患者的腺瘤检出率和每次结肠镜检查腺瘤数量的基准。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1743-1749. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.449. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
4
A prospective RCT comparing combined chromoendoscopy with water exchange (CWE) vs water exchange (WE) vs air insufflation (AI) in adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy.一项前瞻性 RCT 比较了联合染色内镜与水交换（CWE）、水交换（WE）和空气注入（AI）在筛查结肠镜检查中腺瘤检测中的效果。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 May;7(4):477-487. doi: 10.1177/2050640619832196. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
5
Correlation between adenoma detection rate and novel quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. A proposal for quality measures tool kit.腺瘤检出率与结肠镜筛查新质量指标之间的相关性。质量衡量工具包提案。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;52(10):1148-1157. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1339827. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
6
Retrograde inspection standard forward view for the detection of colorectal adenomas during colonoscopy: A back-to-back randomized clinical trial.结肠镜检查中逆行观察标准前视图检测结直肠腺瘤：一项背靠背随机临床试验。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Apr 28;26(16):1962-1970. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i16.1962.
7
The Secondary Quality Indicator to Improve Prediction of Adenoma Miss Rate Apart from Adenoma Detection Rate.除腺瘤检出率外的次要质量指标可提高腺瘤漏检率预测能力。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 May;111(5):723-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.440. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
8
Improving measurement of the adenoma detection rate and adenoma per colonoscopy quality metric: the Indiana University experience.提高腺瘤检出率及每次结肠镜检查腺瘤质量指标的测量：印第安纳大学的经验
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Mar;79(3):448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
9
Correlation between Surrogate Quality Indicators for Adenoma Detection Rate and Adenoma Miss Rate in Qualified Colonoscopy, CORE Study: KASID Multicenter Study.合格结肠镜检查中腺瘤检出率和腺瘤漏检率替代质量指标的相关性：KASID 多中心研究。
Gut Liver. 2022 Sep 15;16(5):716-725. doi: 10.5009/gnl210287. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
10
A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.一种对腺瘤检测具有重大影响的新方法：联合水交换和帽辅助结肠镜检查。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jun;77(6):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.011. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
引用本文的文献
1
Optimizing surveillance in Lynch syndrome: lesion detection and comparative performance of different colonoscopy modalities-a systematic review and network meta-analysis.林奇综合征监测的优化：病变检测及不同结肠镜检查方式的比较性能——一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Aug 12;40(1):175. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04970-2.
2
Efficacy and Safety of L-Menthol During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.L-薄荷醇在胃肠内镜检查中的疗效与安全性——一项随机临床试验的系统评价与Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 17;14(12):4296. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124296.
3
Case-mix-adjusted mean number of polyps per 100 procedures: a new candidate gold standard colonoscopy key performance indicator.每100例手术的病例组合调整后息肉平均数量：一种新的候选结肠镜检查金标准关键绩效指标。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025 May 2;12(1):e001743. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001743.
4
A UK single-center pilot experience using a novel robotic inchworm colonoscopy system.英国单中心使用新型机器人尺蠖式结肠镜检查系统的试点经验。
DEN Open. 2025 Apr 29;6(1):e70123. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70123. eCollection 2026 Apr.
5
Real-World Assessment of the Efficacy of Computer-Assisted Diagnosis in Colonoscopy: A Single Institution Cohort Study in Singapore.结肠镜检查中计算机辅助诊断疗效的真实世界评估：新加坡一项单机构队列研究
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024 Oct 26;2(4):647-655. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.10.002. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma: a single center experience in Jordan.结直肠癌和晚期腺瘤的流行病学及临床特征：约旦的单中心经验
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 27;25(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03531-1.
7
Texture and color enhancement imaging versus white light imaging for the detection of colorectal adenomas: Systematic review and meta-analysis.纹理和颜色增强成像与白光成像在检测大肠腺瘤中的比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jan 13;13:a24749676. doi: 10.1055/a-2474-9676. eCollection 2025.
8
ARE QUALITY INDICATORS IMPORTANT IN COLONOSCOPIES? ANALYSIS OF 3,076 EXAMS IN A PRIVATE TERTIARY SERVICE IN SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL.结肠镜检查中的质量指标重要吗？对巴西东南部一家私立三级医疗机构的3076例检查的分析。
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2025 Feb 10;37:e1864. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202400070e1864. eCollection 2025.
本文引用的文献
1
Comparison of Artificial Intelligence With Other Interventions to Improve Adenoma Detection Rate for Colonoscopy: A Network Meta-analysis.人工智能与其他提高结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率干预措施的比较：一项网状Meta分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 1;58(2):143-155. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001813.
2
Second exam of right colon improves adenoma detection rate: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.右半结肠二次检查可提高腺瘤检出率：随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Oct 17;10(10):E1391-E1398. doi: 10.1055/a-1896-4499. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Impact of 9-Minute Withdrawal Time on the Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.9分钟退镜时间对腺瘤检出率的影响：一项多中心随机对照试验
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;20(2):e168-e181. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.11.019. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
4
Adenomas per colonoscopy and adenoma per positive participant as quality indicators for screening colonoscopy.结肠镜检查腺瘤和阳性参与者腺瘤作为筛查结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Nov;8(11):E1560-E1565. doi: 10.1055/a-1261-9074. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
5
Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.人工智能在结直肠腺瘤和息肉检测中性能的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):77-85.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.059. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
6
How to increase proximal adenoma detection rate: a meta-analysis comparing water exchange, water immersion and air/CO insufflation methods for colonoscopy.如何提高近端腺瘤检出率：一项比较结肠镜检查中注水交换、水浸及空气/二氧化碳充气方法的Meta分析
Ann Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar-Apr;33(2):178-186. doi: 10.20524/aog.2020.0459. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
7
Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques.定时筛查结肠镜检查：两种结肠镜退镜技术的随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1200-1205. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06873-0. Epub 2019 May 29.
8
Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.结直肠各部位内镜退镜时间与腺瘤/息肉检出率的关系：一项 KASID 多中心研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):523-530. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.016. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
9
Factors Associated With Adenoma Detection in Propofol-sedated Patients.丙泊酚镇静患者腺瘤检出率的相关因素。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Aug;53(7):523-529. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001080.
10
Variable Endoscopist performance in proximal and distal adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study.结肠镜检查中内镜医师在近端和远端腺瘤检测方面的表现差异：一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2018 May 30;18(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0800-4.
Zotero 插件