Suppr超能文献

林奇综合征监测的优化:病变检测及不同结肠镜检查方式的比较性能——一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Optimizing surveillance in Lynch syndrome: lesion detection and comparative performance of different colonoscopy modalities-a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Hanen George, Mohammed Hazem E, Nasser Mohamed, Haseeb Mohamed E, Yaser Hatem, Yaser Shehab, Allam Salma

机构信息

School of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.

Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Aug 12;40(1):175. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04970-2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Lynch syndrome patients are at a high risk for developing colorectal cancer; thus, optimal surveillance strategies are required. Although colonoscopic imaging methods differ in diagnostic performance, direct comparisons in this population are not very common. We aimed to evaluate and compare the detection capabilities of white-light endoscopy (WLE), chromoendoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy (NBI: narrow band imaging, LCI: linked color imaging, I-SCAN), and AI-assisted colonoscopy in detecting neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions in individuals diagnosed with Lynch syndrome.

METHODS

Up until March 2025, PubMed, WOS, and Scopus were searched. Relevant studies included observational or interventional designs that contrasted various forms of colonoscopy in adults with Lynch syndrome. The primary outcomes were the lesion detection rate and number of lesions per colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes included total procedure time and withdrawal time. Credibility of the evidence was assessed employing CINeMA.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included. LCI and chromoendoscopy demonstrated a significantly higher neoplastic lesion detection rate compared to WLE (RD 0.11, 95% CI [0.01, 0.21], P = 0.03) and (RD 0.07, 95% CI [0.01, 0.14], P = 0.03), respectively, and LCI significantly detected more lesions per procedure (MD = 0.23, 95% CI 0.01-0.45, P = 0.04). Chromoendoscopy was better at marking the non-neoplastic lesions (RD 0.16, 95% CI [0.05, 0.27], P = 0.005) but had the longest procedure and withdrawal times. AI-assisted, as well as virtual ones, were better than WLE but were not as effective as LCI or chromoendoscopy.

CONCLUSION

In terms of efficiency, LCI and chromoendoscopy improved WLE in detecting neoplastic lesions in Lynch syndrome. Chromoendoscopy remains valuable for non-neoplastic detection, but procedural time is a major drawback. AI-assisted technologies are promising, which require additional investigation.

摘要

目的

林奇综合征患者患结直肠癌的风险很高;因此,需要最佳的监测策略。尽管结肠镜成像方法的诊断性能有所不同,但在这一人群中进行直接比较并不常见。我们旨在评估和比较白光内镜检查(WLE)、色素内镜检查、虚拟色素内镜检查(NBI:窄带成像、LCI:链接彩色成像、I-SCAN)和人工智能辅助结肠镜检查在检测林奇综合征患者肿瘤性和非肿瘤性病变方面的能力。

方法

截至2025年3月,检索了PubMed、WOS和Scopus。相关研究包括观察性或干预性设计,对比了林奇综合征成年患者的各种结肠镜检查形式。主要结局是病变检出率和每次结肠镜检查的病变数量。次要结局包括总操作时间和退镜时间。采用CINeMA评估证据的可信度。

结果

纳入了9项研究。与WLE相比,LCI和色素内镜检查的肿瘤性病变检出率显著更高(相对危险度分别为0.11,95%可信区间[0.01,0.21],P = 0.03)和(相对危险度为0.07,95%可信区间[0.01,0.14],P = 0.03),且LCI每次检查显著检测到更多病变(平均差 = 0.23,95%可信区间0.01 - 0.45,P = 0.04)。色素内镜检查在标记非肿瘤性病变方面表现更好(相对危险度为0.16,95%可信区间[0.05,0.27],P = 0.005),但操作和退镜时间最长。人工智能辅助以及虚拟内镜检查优于WLE,但不如LCI或色素内镜检查有效。

结论

在效率方面,LCI和色素内镜检查在检测林奇综合征患者肿瘤性病变方面优于WLE。色素内镜检查在非肿瘤性病变检测中仍然有价值,但操作时间是一个主要缺点。人工智能辅助技术很有前景,需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3174/12343729/cc78af500f93/384_2025_4970_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验