Ducos R, Donoso J, Weickhardt U, Vietti T J
Cancer. 1979 Apr;43(4):1479-82. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197904)43:4<1479::aid-cncr2820430439>3.0.co;2-s.
A sedimentation technique for cytologic study of CSF was compared with the standard cytocentrifugation method. Seventy-five samples from 37 children with leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were processed by both methods. Total yield of cells and cytomorphology with differentials were analyzed. The techniques are comparable and both allow good cytologic study of the CSF even with very low cell counts/mm3. The sedimentation method can be used as an alternative, especially if a cytocentrifuge is not available. When both methods are used, the possibility of negative cell yield is decreased.
将一种用于脑脊液细胞学研究的沉降技术与标准细胞离心法进行了比较。对37例白血病和非霍奇金淋巴瘤患儿的75份样本采用两种方法进行处理。分析了细胞的总产量以及不同细胞类型的细胞形态。这两种技术具有可比性,即使细胞计数非常低(每立方毫米),它们都能对脑脊液进行良好的细胞学研究。沉降法可作为一种替代方法,尤其是在没有细胞离心机的情况下。当同时使用这两种方法时,细胞产量为阴性的可能性会降低。