Dyken P R, Shirley S, Trefz J, El Gammal T
Acta Cytol. 1980 Mar-Apr;24(2):167-70.
Two methods of processing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cells for morphologic study were compared. The newer cytocentrifugation method, using the Shandon Cytospin apparatus, allowed slightly quicker processing of cells but did not appreciably influence the total time needed to fully study the cells. The preservation of cells, as measured by observation of cellular detail, was better after the use of older, more gentle, sedimentation technique. The sedimentation technique was generally found to yield a higher number of total cells. The loss of small cells by the sedimentation method was not statistically greater than with the cytocentrifugation method, but large cell collection was significantly better. The older sedimentation method is concluded to be preferable to the newer cytocentrifugation method for CSF cytomorphology.
比较了两种处理脑脊液(CSF)细胞用于形态学研究的方法。较新的细胞离心法,使用Shandon Cytospin仪器,能使细胞处理速度稍快,但对全面研究细胞所需的总时间没有明显影响。通过观察细胞细节来衡量,使用较旧、更温和的沉淀技术后细胞保存得更好。一般发现沉淀技术产生的细胞总数更多。沉淀法中小细胞的损失在统计学上并不比细胞离心法大,但大细胞的收集明显更好。结论是,对于脑脊液细胞形态学,较旧的沉淀法比更新的细胞离心法更可取。